<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pyracy on Parade — Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2009/11/30/pyracy-on-parade-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/30/pyracy-on-parade-part-2/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:10:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/30/pyracy-on-parade-part-2/#comment-189648</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5094#comment-189648</guid>
		<description>What a lot of ignornance displayed! 
 
Why are the Somalis Pirates? Because they&#039;re dirt poor and living in a failed state. Why wouldnt they risk this, there&#039;s little chance of actual punishment. Mostly these guys were fishermen. Fishing was totaly trashed by &#039;More developed&#039; nations over fishing their waters and polution.  
Now I see its making a comeback as foreign boats start to avoid the place. Many of the first attacks were just to drive off foreign flagged fishing vessels inside the national limits. ie Foreigners exploiting the lack of a effective Somali State. But hey it PAYS and now everyone wants to get a peice of that action. 
 
Landing, invasion, bombing runs? Good Luck. its a BIG place and killing civilians and famillies of &#039;maybe pirates&#039; looks bad on air and forces the currently pretty agnostic pirates straight into the islamic millitants arms. Way to give Bin Laden a Navy!  
 
Maybe if the west tried to stabalise the nation state, give people jobs and you know, the rule of law...it might help a bit. If there&#039;s nothing to loose the cost of making it too dangerous to pirate is toooo high.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a lot of ignornance displayed! </p>
<p>Why are the Somalis Pirates? Because they’re dirt poor and living in a failed state. Why wouldnt they risk this, there’s little chance of actual punishment. Mostly these guys were fishermen. Fishing was totaly trashed by ‘More developed’ nations over fishing their waters and polution.<br />
Now I see its making a comeback as foreign boats start to avoid the place. Many of the first attacks were just to drive off foreign flagged fishing vessels inside the national limits. ie Foreigners exploiting the lack of a effective Somali State. But hey it PAYS and now everyone wants to get a peice of that action. </p>
<p>Landing, invasion, bombing runs? Good Luck. its a BIG place and killing civilians and famillies of ‘maybe pirates’ looks bad on air and forces the currently pretty agnostic pirates straight into the islamic millitants arms. Way to give Bin Laden a Navy!  </p>
<p>Maybe if the west tried to stabalise the nation state, give people jobs and you know, the rule of law…it might help a bit. If there’s nothing to loose the cost of making it too dangerous to pirate is toooo high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Avery</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/30/pyracy-on-parade-part-2/#comment-189588</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Avery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5094#comment-189588</guid>
		<description>Ok reading my comment I found that it might be confusing when I say make multiple of these i&#039;m talking about the bases. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok reading my comment I found that it might be confusing when I say make multiple of these i’m talking about the bases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Avery</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/30/pyracy-on-parade-part-2/#comment-189587</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Avery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5094#comment-189587</guid>
		<description>you realize that youtubers use the &quot;you spelled it wrong your dumb because you can&#039;t spell&quot; excuse. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you realize that youtubers use the “you spelled it wrong your dumb because you can’t spell” excuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Avery</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/30/pyracy-on-parade-part-2/#comment-189586</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Avery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5094#comment-189586</guid>
		<description>that long really you quiet a bit of an optimist </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that long really you quiet a bit of an optimist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Avery</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/30/pyracy-on-parade-part-2/#comment-189583</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Avery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5094#comment-189583</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if this would work find a large or multiple islands off the coast setup a base use thermal and satelite to find the motherships attack those then use the old vietnam PT boats (of course updated with new weaponary and equipment) to patrol. To clarify i&#039;m talking about the ones with the twin 50s twin 20mms and the other two side mgs. Maybe make multiple of these and make them blatently obvious to the pirates but have well hidden defenses to once again kill more pirates. Is that feasible? I figure that that will work for killing the pirates which some agree is the way to go about ending this. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t know if this would work find a large or multiple islands off the coast setup a base use thermal and satelite to find the motherships attack those then use the old vietnam PT boats (of course updated with new weaponary and equipment) to patrol. To clarify i’m talking about the ones with the twin 50s twin 20mms and the other two side mgs. Maybe make multiple of these and make them blatently obvious to the pirates but have well hidden defenses to once again kill more pirates. Is that feasible? I figure that that will work for killing the pirates which some agree is the way to go about ending this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MIKE</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/30/pyracy-on-parade-part-2/#comment-189563</link>
		<dc:creator>MIKE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 05:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5094#comment-189563</guid>
		<description>lol, O your good. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol, O your good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nbjunk</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/30/pyracy-on-parade-part-2/#comment-189557</link>
		<dc:creator>nbjunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 03:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5094#comment-189557</guid>
		<description>President Jefferson and subsequently President Madison both dealt with Islamic pirates. Along the way they sent Bainbridge and Decatur after the Barbary pirates. I find it interesting that one of the few attacks on the pirates by the US today involved SEAL snipers shooting from the decks of the USS Bainbridge - the significance of which was apparently missed by the media. However, thats one of and insignificant handful of actions against the pirates. 
 
Wonder what Jefferson and Madison would think of they way we&#039;re dealing with the pirates. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Jefferson and subsequently President Madison both dealt with Islamic pirates. Along the way they sent Bainbridge and Decatur after the Barbary pirates. I find it interesting that one of the few attacks on the pirates by the US today involved SEAL snipers shooting from the decks of the USS Bainbridge — the significance of which was apparently missed by the media. However, thats one of and insignificant handful of actions against the pirates. </p>
<p>Wonder what Jefferson and Madison would think of they way we’re dealing with the pirates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byron Skinner</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/30/pyracy-on-parade-part-2/#comment-189521</link>
		<dc:creator>Byron Skinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5094#comment-189521</guid>
		<description>Good Morning Folks,

Well it&#039;s been over a year now and the Pyrates (I&#039;ve been spelling the word that way for years) are still winning. I say again once on the water all the Navies in the world can&#039;t stop the Pyrates. They must be stopped on the beach. 

If the Pyrates can&#039;t find a way to get money for taking ships the will have to turn to other vocations, perhaps they would do better as politicians. 

Cut out the middle men and it&#039;s, oh wait you can do that, there are some firms that are to big to fail who a years ago the Bush administration bail out with $5 trillion in this Pyracy venture. It appears with sub-prime mortgages dead the speculators have had to look to alternative investments.
 
Let see the ransoms are in the $2-5 million range, the teenage Pyrates get about $20,000.00 each, maybe a Pyrate a crew will be 10, that&#039;s a $200,000.00 in labor costs. Then there is capitalization, and incindental overhead (old AK-47&#039;s, RPG-5&#039;s, or do it on the cheap and give the Pyrates some very old Chicom Type 56 rifles and B-60/61 rocket launchers since most will likely be thrown over board anyways, Sat. Phones, some old 5-50 Khz. short wave communications equipment for the mother ship, fuel, drugs etc.) is, say maybe is another $100,000,00 lets be generous that $300,000.00 in cost. There is a nice bit of net profit in Pyracy with zero risk.

The place to stop the Pyrates is on Wall Street not out in the the Indian Ocean.

ALLONS,
Byron Skinner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Morning Folks,</p>
<p>Well it’s been over a year now and the Pyrates (I’ve been spelling the word that way for years) are still winning. I say again once on the water all the Navies in the world can’t stop the Pyrates. They must be stopped on the beach. </p>
<p>If the Pyrates can’t find a way to get money for taking ships the will have to turn to other vocations, perhaps they would do better as politicians. </p>
<p>Cut out the middle men and it’s, oh wait you can do that, there are some firms that are to big to fail who a years ago the Bush administration bail out with $5 trillion in this Pyracy venture. It appears with sub-prime mortgages dead the speculators have had to look to alternative investments.</p>
<p>Let see the ransoms are in the $2–5 million range, the teenage Pyrates get about $20,000.00 each, maybe a Pyrate a crew will be 10, that’s a $200,000.00 in labor costs. Then there is capitalization, and incindental overhead (old AK-47’s, RPG-5’s, or do it on the cheap and give the Pyrates some very old Chicom Type 56 rifles and B-60/61 rocket launchers since most will likely be thrown over board anyways, Sat. Phones, some old 5–50 Khz. short wave communications equipment for the mother ship, fuel, drugs etc.) is, say maybe is another $100,000,00 lets be generous that $300,000.00 in cost. There is a nice bit of net profit in Pyracy with zero risk.</p>
<p>The place to stop the Pyrates is on Wall Street not out in the the Indian Ocean.</p>
<p>ALLONS,<br />
Byron Skinner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zandor</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/30/pyracy-on-parade-part-2/#comment-189517</link>
		<dc:creator>Zandor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5094#comment-189517</guid>
		<description>Are you sure that your first name isn&#039;t  Benzedrine? 
 
If not, my suggestion would be to drastically cut back on those triple espressos with which you use to wash down those amphetamine tablets. 
 
Keep up the good work, and above all stay alert. 
 
Ciao. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure that your first name isn’t  Benzedrine? </p>
<p>If not, my suggestion would be to drastically cut back on those triple espressos with which you use to wash down those amphetamine tablets. </p>
<p>Keep up the good work, and above all stay alert. </p>
<p>Ciao.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/30/pyracy-on-parade-part-2/#comment-189524</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5094#comment-189524</guid>
		<description>It has a 57mm cannon as its main weapon. A PT boat was probably better armed... 
 
Though now that I think about it, something like Vietnam&#039;s brown water navy would work here. Work with somewhat bigger boats for enhanced blue water capability, swarm the water with small boats. 
 
I guess the Perrys are going to have to do the job.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has a 57mm cannon as its main weapon. A PT boat was probably better armed… </p>
<p>Though now that I think about it, something like Vietnam’s brown water navy would work here. Work with somewhat bigger boats for enhanced blue water capability, swarm the water with small boats. </p>
<p>I guess the Perrys are going to have to do the job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

