<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Send in the Jarheads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2009/12/01/send-in-the-jarheads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/01/send-in-the-jarheads/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:10:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: phrogdriver</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/01/send-in-the-jarheads/#comment-189893</link>
		<dc:creator>phrogdriver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 21:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5099#comment-189893</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t tell by the endcaps, at least anymore. 
 
Don&#039;t know what their loadout is, but based on the fact that the Taliban aren&#039;t know to be rocking any radar-guided weapons, but are well-known as having a number of IR-guided MANPADS, it&#039;s probably all flares. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can’t tell by the endcaps, at least anymore. </p>
<p>Don’t know what their loadout is, but based on the fact that the Taliban aren’t know to be rocking any radar-guided weapons, but are well-known as having a number of IR-guided MANPADS, it’s probably all flares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/01/send-in-the-jarheads/#comment-189701</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5099#comment-189701</guid>
		<description>Because the Taliban will just wait for us to leave. We are giving them our timetable. 
 
Obama went full retard. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because the Taliban will just wait for us to leave. We are giving them our timetable. </p>
<p>Obama went full retard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EpShot</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/01/send-in-the-jarheads/#comment-189636</link>
		<dc:creator>EpShot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 02:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5099#comment-189636</guid>
		<description>yes, over 2 years of no Taliban interference in Afghanistan would be soooo bad for the country. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, over 2 years of no Taliban interference in Afghanistan would be soooo bad for the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/01/send-in-the-jarheads/#comment-189653</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5099#comment-189653</guid>
		<description>Let the Afgans fight their own battles. I thought the few SF&#039;s people that were with the Afgans helping to direct our air assets did the most good. Afganistan will NEVER BE SECURE !!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let the Afgans fight their own battles. I thought the few SF’s people that were with the Afgans helping to direct our air assets did the most good. Afganistan will NEVER BE SECURE !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EpShot</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/01/send-in-the-jarheads/#comment-189635</link>
		<dc:creator>EpShot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5099#comment-189635</guid>
		<description>please explain how a year an d a half of stability in Afghanistan while we pursue them would be bad. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please explain how a year an d a half of stability in Afghanistan while we pursue them would be bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phrogger</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/01/send-in-the-jarheads/#comment-189630</link>
		<dc:creator>phrogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 20:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5099#comment-189630</guid>
		<description>LMAO...chaff and flare dispenser. Yes, there is another &quot;atm&quot; on the other side. they are activated by the pilot or the crewchief in the back by means of &quot;panic buttons&quot;. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LMAO…chaff and flare dispenser. Yes, there is another “atm” on the other side. they are activated by the pilot or the crewchief in the back by means of “panic buttons”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strummer </title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/01/send-in-the-jarheads/#comment-189627</link>
		<dc:creator>Strummer </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 20:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5099#comment-189627</guid>
		<description>Obama can&#039;t, Bush opened a new can of worms with Iraq. Maybe this will screw the country up so bad, will get a president with a head on his shoulders (note I didn&#039;t say her because of the two likely female presidential canidates). Who knows how to take care of his troops, his people, his land, and his country. Until then we&#039;ll be controlled by a government that looks more and more like a joke, every day. The current administration&#039;s goal is to advocate it&#039;s own political ideologies, so was the last&#039;s  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama can’t, Bush opened a new can of worms with Iraq. Maybe this will screw the country up so bad, will get a president with a head on his shoulders (note I didn’t say her because of the two likely female presidential canidates). Who knows how to take care of his troops, his people, his land, and his country. Until then we’ll be controlled by a government that looks more and more like a joke, every day. The current administration’s goal is to advocate it’s own political ideologies, so was the last’s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MIKE</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/01/send-in-the-jarheads/#comment-189626</link>
		<dc:creator>MIKE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 20:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5099#comment-189626</guid>
		<description>This is pure politics, and I can assure that during Bush&#039;s term, it was not all politics. The Generals asked, and received. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is pure politics, and I can assure that during Bush’s term, it was not all politics. The Generals asked, and received.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elgatoso</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/01/send-in-the-jarheads/#comment-189625</link>
		<dc:creator>elgatoso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 20:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5099#comment-189625</guid>
		<description>We don&#039;t care about politics,we care about new tech. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don’t care about politics,we care about new tech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IYAOYASE9</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/01/send-in-the-jarheads/#comment-189622</link>
		<dc:creator>IYAOYASE9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5099#comment-189622</guid>
		<description>&quot;If I&#039;m not mistaken McCrystal made this request, Obama did not &quot;come up with a Bush-esque surge...&quot;.&quot; 
---- 
Actually more Bush Lite than Bush-esque. 
 
McCrystal asked for more combat forces, 80,000 at the high end with 40,000 the minimum, no time limits, more NATO/European combat and support forces and much more to insure success. 
 
What he got was less US combat forces, few foreign combat forces, a few more foreign support units and an emphasis on a modified cut and run strategy - regardless of success or failure. 
 
Nothing more than a hodge podge of war stew ingredients to temper the criticism of both the left and right, save prospects for upcoming elections and preserve the goals of using all available obtainable funds for his social agenda. 
 
More post turtle tactics. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“If I’m not mistaken McCrystal made this request, Obama did not “come up with a Bush-esque surge…”.“<br />
—-<br />
Actually more Bush Lite than Bush-esque. </p>
<p>McCrystal asked for more combat forces, 80,000 at the high end with 40,000 the minimum, no time limits, more NATO/European combat and support forces and much more to insure success. </p>
<p>What he got was less US combat forces, few foreign combat forces, a few more foreign support units and an emphasis on a modified cut and run strategy — regardless of success or failure. </p>
<p>Nothing more than a hodge podge of war stew ingredients to temper the criticism of both the left and right, save prospects for upcoming elections and preserve the goals of using all available obtainable funds for his social agenda. </p>
<p>More post turtle tactics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

