<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: To Camouflage Your Weapon or Not, That is the Question</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2009/12/03/to-camouflage-your-weapon-or-not-that-is-the-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/03/to-camouflage-your-weapon-or-not-that-is-the-question/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:06:43 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: bang-bang chicken</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/03/to-camouflage-your-weapon-or-not-that-is-the-question/#comment-216271</link> <dc:creator>bang-bang chicken</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 23:50:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5118#comment-216271</guid> <description>This is an easy fix. Simply add camo-tape. You can&#039;t create gang signs using a set pattern and it will help soldiers to personalize their weapons. It is also removable. As far as painting, It comes down to you CO. If i remember the reg. right. You can paint your weapons as long as it doesn&#039;t interfere with any of the main components. But Taping them would be a better option and it would be cost efficient. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an easy fix. Simply add camo-tape. You can’t create gang signs using a set pattern and it will help soldiers to personalize their weapons. It is also removable. As far as painting, It comes down to you CO. If i remember the reg. right. You can paint your weapons as long as it doesn’t interfere with any of the main components. But Taping them would be a better option and it would be cost efficient.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/03/to-camouflage-your-weapon-or-not-that-is-the-question/#comment-213179</link> <dc:creator>John</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 08:48:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5118#comment-213179</guid> <description> I do agree tactically a black rifle is a bad idea. But for those that don&#039;t know black was taken out of militay uniforms because it shows up BRIGHT white through night vision, that is the only reason!  Anything black will appear white through night vision which takes a good amout of it&#039;s night camo advantage away. It&#039;s like running around in snow camo at night. So a black rifle would be white as well and make you easier to identify as a combatant from a longer distance. That&#039;s why Special Ops paint thier weapons, so it&#039;s harder to see them during the day AND night. Some day the main line unit commanders will figure this out and MAYBE then their Joes will be allowed to paint their weapons? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do agree tactically a black rifle is a bad idea. But for those that don’t know black was taken out of militay uniforms because it shows up BRIGHT white through night vision, that is the only reason!  Anything black will appear white through night vision which takes a good amout of it’s night camo advantage away. It’s like running around in snow camo at night. So a black rifle would be white as well and make you easier to identify as a combatant from a longer distance. That’s why Special Ops paint thier weapons, so it’s harder to see them during the day AND night. Some day the main line unit commanders will figure this out and MAYBE then their Joes will be allowed to paint their weapons?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/03/to-camouflage-your-weapon-or-not-that-is-the-question/#comment-213178</link> <dc:creator>John</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 08:47:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5118#comment-213178</guid> <description>Uhh... it&#039;s the main line unit commanders that don&#039;t want to paint their pretty black rifles. I served in an SF group and we painted our guns ourselves with rattle can paint for years(krylon). Never had any problems with the paint burning up on the barrel and we fire a ass load of ammo through those rifles. Plus if I&#039;m not mistaken krylon now advertises their paint for gun camo? Best thing is you scuff it up you break out a can anf touch it up! All this stuff about camo tape like hunters use, tried it and it don&#039;t last. You spend a few days in the suck and that crap falls apart. Duct tape will stay on but you wil have one hell of a mess to clean off you weapon when you barrel melts that crap all over you rifle. As far as balck rifles getting too hot to hold with you bare hands in desert heat never hear such a thing?! I spent the better part of 5 years in the middle east and did some long freak&#039;n extended patrols in 135 degree heat and never new any one to have that problem, and the Rangers we did some ops with weren&#039;t allowed to paint their weapons? Never knew anyone who burned thier hands on a black weapon? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uhh… it’s the main line unit commanders that don’t want to paint their pretty black rifles. I served in an SF group and we painted our guns ourselves with rattle can paint for years(krylon). Never had any problems with the paint burning up on the barrel and we fire a ass load of ammo through those rifles. Plus if I’m not mistaken krylon now advertises their paint for gun camo? Best thing is you scuff it up you break out a can anf touch it up!</p><p> All this stuff about camo tape like hunters use, tried it and it don’t last. You spend a few days in the suck and that crap falls apart. Duct tape will stay on but you wil have one hell of a mess to clean off you weapon when you barrel melts that crap all over you rifle.</p><p> As far as balck rifles getting too hot to hold with you bare hands in desert heat never hear such a thing?! I spent the better part of 5 years in the middle east and did some long freak’n extended patrols in 135 degree heat and never new any one to have that problem, and the Rangers we did some ops with weren’t allowed to paint their weapons? Never knew anyone who burned thier hands on a black weapon?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ian</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/03/to-camouflage-your-weapon-or-not-that-is-the-question/#comment-193053</link> <dc:creator>ian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:02:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5118#comment-193053</guid> <description>I personally dont give 2 craps as to what color my rifle is as long as it works. I doubt that the terrorist on the other end of the barrel is gonna say &quot;Hey man that is a great tan/green that you used on your rifle. Where can i get that color of paint for my AK.&quot; If you really what to camo your rifle then just go buy a roll of camo tape. Its easy to take off and you can put it back on if you want it back on. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally dont give 2 craps as to what color my rifle is as long as it works. I doubt that the terrorist on the other end of the barrel is gonna say “Hey man that is a great tan/green that you used on your rifle. Where can i get that color of paint for my AK.” If you really what to camo your rifle then just go buy a roll of camo tape. Its easy to take off and you can put it back on if you want it back on.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: William C.</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/03/to-camouflage-your-weapon-or-not-that-is-the-question/#comment-190486</link> <dc:creator>William C.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:03:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5118#comment-190486</guid> <description>I for one question the actual utility of camouflaging our soldiers weapons, but if they want to do so we should offer them that option. One of the advantages of newer weapons like the Remington ACR, XM8, G36, SCAR L, and so forth is that if you just change the color of the plastic used, you have pretty much changed the color of the whole rifle. This is harder to do with older weapons like the M4 and M16 however, which have more exposed metal surfaces and such. Perhaps just procuring some different color rail covers and stocks would do something to break up the outline however. In my opinion the US Army should stop waiting for the next big small arms development as they have been for years now, and adopt a new 5.56mm or 6.8mm assault rifle. Then get it from the factory with the plastic a general purpose gray color. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one question the actual utility of camouflaging our soldiers weapons, but if they want to do so we should offer them that option.</p><p>One of the advantages of newer weapons like the Remington ACR, XM8, G36, SCAR L, and so forth is that if you just change the color of the plastic used, you have pretty much changed the color of the whole rifle. This is harder to do with older weapons like the M4 and M16 however, which have more exposed metal surfaces and such. Perhaps just procuring some different color rail covers and stocks would do something to break up the outline however.</p><p>In my opinion the US Army should stop waiting for the next big small arms development as they have been for years now, and adopt a new 5.56mm or 6.8mm assault rifle. Then get it from the factory with the plastic a general purpose gray color.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Erres</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/03/to-camouflage-your-weapon-or-not-that-is-the-question/#comment-190002</link> <dc:creator>Erres</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 11:15:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5118#comment-190002</guid> <description>The biggest givaway of a weapon (painted or not) is the straight barrel. even Tanks try to conceal that with netting to make it look like a tree trunk/branch. Why not hide the barrel? You could use an irregular shaped tube (any nonburning material) that fits over the barrel and fasten to the bajonet socket or a loophole. Paint it like a piece of wood. Use (green) elastic bands to keep grass, foilage or cloth attached as well . The high placed aiming devices of the M16/M4 weapon family are not effected - an other example: the kitty corner shot &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=123766&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php...&lt;/a&gt; ps. The size of the tube might impress/scare people as well (see: the Sherman Tanks from the movie &quot;Kellies Heroes&quot;!) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest givaway of a weapon (painted or not) is the straight barrel. even Tanks try to conceal that with netting to make it look like a tree trunk/branch. Why not hide the barrel?<br /> You could use an irregular shaped tube (any nonburning material) that fits over the barrel and fasten to the bajonet socket or a loophole. Paint it like a piece of wood. Use (green) elastic bands to keep grass, foilage or cloth attached as well .<br /> The high placed aiming devices of the M16/M4 weapon family are not effected<br /> – an other example: the kitty corner shot <a href="http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=123766" target="_blank">http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php…</a></p><p>ps. The size of the tube might impress/scare people as well (see: the Sherman Tanks from the movie “Kellies Heroes”!)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kody Grimes</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/03/to-camouflage-your-weapon-or-not-that-is-the-question/#comment-189973</link> <dc:creator>Kody Grimes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 19:56:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5118#comment-189973</guid> <description>It&#039;s simple, just have a set of different patterns for desert, woodland, etc. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s simple, just have a set of different patterns for desert, woodland, etc.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bill</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/03/to-camouflage-your-weapon-or-not-that-is-the-question/#comment-189972</link> <dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 19:42:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5118#comment-189972</guid> <description>The real problem is the statement &quot;black doesn&#039;t exist in nature&quot;. While that is technically true (outside of a black hole, anyway), it&#039;s also irrelevant. The human eye sees the 200 shades or so from true black to very dark brown or blue as the same color: black. We can&#039;t tell the difference. Our depth perception tells our brains that the darker something is, the further away it is. This is why the woodland pattern &#039;breaks up&#039; us up so well. Parts of our uniform seem further away than other parts, so it doesn&#039;t register as looking human. Camouflaging the weapon is important, sure, but ultimately pointless until the glow-in-the-light Universally Concealment Proof pattern is replaced. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real problem is the statement “black doesn’t exist in nature”. While that is technically true (outside of a black hole, anyway), it’s also irrelevant. The human eye sees the 200 shades or so from true black to very dark brown or blue as the same color: black. We can’t tell the difference. Our depth perception tells our brains that the darker something is, the further away it is. This is why the woodland pattern ‘breaks up’ us up so well. Parts of our uniform seem further away than other parts, so it doesn’t register as looking human. Camouflaging the weapon is important, sure, but ultimately pointless until the glow-in-the-light Universally Concealment Proof pattern is replaced.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WarScientist</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/03/to-camouflage-your-weapon-or-not-that-is-the-question/#comment-189945</link> <dc:creator>WarScientist</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 11:01:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5118#comment-189945</guid> <description>Also, if your are worried about gang signs on your guns, i think the problem is more of a recruitment issue instead of what happens when you give a soldier a can of spray paint However, even then, as long as the gang-sign in question is in OD green or tan, it will still help break up the outline of your gun (and at close range might buy you a split second where the enemy looks at your gun and tries to figure what gang u are from, whereupon you shoot him in the face and say &quot;USA motherf*cker, that&#039;s where I&#039;m from!&quot;) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, if your are worried about gang signs on your guns, i think the problem is more of a recruitment issue instead of what happens when you give a soldier a can of spray paint</p><p>However, even then, as long as the gang-sign in question is in OD green or tan, it will still help break up the outline of your gun (and at close range might buy you a split second where the enemy looks at your gun and tries to figure what gang u are from, whereupon you shoot him in the face and say “USA motherf*cker, that’s where I’m from!”)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adam</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/03/to-camouflage-your-weapon-or-not-that-is-the-question/#comment-189921</link> <dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 11:29:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5118#comment-189921</guid> <description>Give soldiers some tan and brown krylon paint and watch them fail to dissapoint. Soldiers are sick and tired of being babysitted and treated like children by the chain of command.Also, Duraheat can be used on the barrel to withstand high temperatures.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give soldiers some tan and brown krylon paint and watch them fail to dissapoint. Soldiers are sick and tired of being babysitted and treated like children by the chain of command.</p><p>Also, Duraheat can be used on the barrel to withstand high temperatures.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.005 seconds using apc
Object Caching 743/747 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 04:26:07 -->
