<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: With Special Forces a New Tactic in Afghanistan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2009/12/15/with-special-forces-a-new-tactic-in-afghanistan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/15/with-special-forces-a-new-tactic-in-afghanistan/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:10:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aston</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/15/with-special-forces-a-new-tactic-in-afghanistan/#comment-206857</link>
		<dc:creator>Aston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5216#comment-206857</guid>
		<description>Link not working anymore :(. First link says page not found, Youtube link says video is private. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Link not working anymore :(. First link says page not found, Youtube link says video is private.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anton</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/15/with-special-forces-a-new-tactic-in-afghanistan/#comment-191229</link>
		<dc:creator>anton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5216#comment-191229</guid>
		<description>Of course they will not show the caravans they blew sky high ,but good work done fast ,dangerios.in /out the way well enter and leave .. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course they will not show the caravans they blew sky high ‚but good work done fast ‚dangerios.in /out the way well enter and leave ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anton</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/15/with-special-forces-a-new-tactic-in-afghanistan/#comment-191228</link>
		<dc:creator>anton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5216#comment-191228</guid>
		<description>Its a matter of ousting coruption and getting the taliban out doa.. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a matter of ousting coruption and getting the taliban out doa..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oneofthem</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/15/with-special-forces-a-new-tactic-in-afghanistan/#comment-191215</link>
		<dc:creator>oneofthem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 15:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5216#comment-191215</guid>
		<description>you are a retard, have you ever served over there at all, before you talk about stuff you know nothing about, research it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you are a retard, have you ever served over there at all, before you talk about stuff you know nothing about, research it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mat</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/15/with-special-forces-a-new-tactic-in-afghanistan/#comment-191070</link>
		<dc:creator>mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5216#comment-191070</guid>
		<description>100k $ traffic check ,innovative ways to throw cash and much needed air assets away for random vehicle search.And why 4-5 helicopters ,and even if you do it like this you could more likely than not handle it with 2x AH/MH-6 and a fraction of man power. And if you are just searchin to pick a fight go ask the brits as they have running firefights in Helmand province on daily basis ,but unlike the us forces wery limited air assets.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100k $ traffic check ‚innovative ways to throw cash and much needed air assets away for random vehicle search.And why 4–5 helicopters ‚and even if you do it like this you could more likely than not handle it with 2x AH/MH-6 and a fraction of man power. And if you are just searchin to pick a fight go ask the brits as they have running firefights in Helmand province on daily basis ‚but unlike the us forces wery limited air assets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/15/with-special-forces-a-new-tactic-in-afghanistan/#comment-190877</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 04:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5216#comment-190877</guid>
		<description>In the end it&#039;s a matter of out-carrotting the Taliban or out-sticking the Taliban.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the end it’s a matter of out-carrotting the Taliban or out-sticking the Taliban.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WJS</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/15/with-special-forces-a-new-tactic-in-afghanistan/#comment-190871</link>
		<dc:creator>WJS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5216#comment-190871</guid>
		<description>On soldiersystems.com there is a video of a task force in Afghanistan wearing UCP-Delta on patrol.  I think it looks a hell of a lot better than the current camo and blends very well with the terrain.  Check it out.  Is UCP-D a variation of German camo? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On soldiersystems.com there is a video of a task force in Afghanistan wearing UCP-Delta on patrol.  I think it looks a hell of a lot better than the current camo and blends very well with the terrain.  Check it out.  Is UCP-D a variation of German camo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohwilleke</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/15/with-special-forces-a-new-tactic-in-afghanistan/#comment-190860</link>
		<dc:creator>ohwilleke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5216#comment-190860</guid>
		<description>This will make Taliban forces nervous, certainly.  But, it will also make everybody else nervous, because nothing in the description (helicopter checkpoint?) indicates that it is well targeted.  Would you trust someone who dropped out of the sky and pointed several guns at you or one of your neighbors? 
 
Afghanistan is all about convincing the Afghan people to side with the current civilian government, rather than the Taliban.  This approach sounds like the stick without the carrot, and illustrates graphically for all involved that the U.S. Forces don&#039;t know who is with them and who is against them. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will make Taliban forces nervous, certainly.  But, it will also make everybody else nervous, because nothing in the description (helicopter checkpoint?) indicates that it is well targeted.  Would you trust someone who dropped out of the sky and pointed several guns at you or one of your neighbors? </p>
<p>Afghanistan is all about convincing the Afghan people to side with the current civilian government, rather than the Taliban.  This approach sounds like the stick without the carrot, and illustrates graphically for all involved that the U.S. Forces don’t know who is with them and who is against them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mat</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/15/with-special-forces-a-new-tactic-in-afghanistan/#comment-190849</link>
		<dc:creator>mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5216#comment-190849</guid>
		<description>That realy seems an expensive traffic stop(but it was probably just publicity stunt for Fox),and a random operating method which is probably not overly effective and poor use of air power.Maybe they should start by checking convoy escorts as taliban are paid(800-2000 $ per truck) for to protect US supply convoys for most of their way from pakistan to Kabul so for much of the trip they actually escort the trucks. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That realy seems an expensive traffic stop(but it was probably just publicity stunt for Fox),and a random operating method which is probably not overly effective and poor use of air power.Maybe they should start by checking convoy escorts as taliban are paid(800‑2000 $ per truck) for to protect US supply convoys for most of their way from pakistan to Kabul so for much of the trip they actually escort the trucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/12/15/with-special-forces-a-new-tactic-in-afghanistan/#comment-190844</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=5216#comment-190844</guid>
		<description>Correct. Afghans often wear Woodland BDUs. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct. Afghans often wear Woodland BDUs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

