DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Ground Vehicles » Bye Bye HUMVEE

Bye Bye HUMVEE

It’s with great sadness that I report to you that Pentagon Comptroller Robert Hale just said at his briefing that 2010 would be the last year that the Pentagon would buy the venerable High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle.

Budget documents released today show that the the Pentagon is devoting about $1 million to replace war losses of Humvees, but will buy none over and above the current numbers. The Pentagon budgeted for about 8,000 Humvees in FY 2010 to the tune of $1.3 billion.

We’ll likely get more info on how serious the Army is about the JLTV, the Humvee’s replacement, at the Army breakout in a few minutes. But it’s just gigantic that the newest budget zeros out funds for the Humvee. Since about 1985, the Humvee has served very well in a variety of roles both as its originally intended support vehicle role and as a no joke combat vehicle in Iraq and Afghanistan. About 100,000 have been produced in various configurations for the US military.

I’ve logged many hours in Humvees of various configurations and I had to good fortune to travel to Mishawaka, Ind., and South Bend, to see the production facility and drive the AM General test track in an uparmored Humvee. I’m psyched about the possibilities of the JLTV and feel that it’s high time we moved away from the Humvee, but I’ll look back with great affection at that cramped, dusty, bumpy, creaky, stinky, hot, bull-dog-tough truck.

UPDATE: Army budget officials Lt. Gen. Edgar Stanton said at the breakout that “we reached the end of the line with the Humvee a sooner than we expected.” Fewer losses in Iraq and Afghanistan and the introduction of the M-ATV makes for “fewer uses for the Humvee.” 

– Christian

Share |

February 1st, 2010 | Ground Vehicles, Money Money Money | 556725 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2010/02/01/bye-bye-humvee/Bye+Bye+HUMVEE2010-02-01+20%3A26%3A47christian You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « QDR Signals JSF and Counterinsurgency Planes Live | Oodles of Grenade Guns for Joes in 2011 » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. ohwilleke says:
    February 1, 2010 at 8:51 pm

    It is interesting how modest the advances in automotive technology have been from 1985 to 2009. For example, two of the top ten models (obviously with numerous incremental modifications), the Honda Accord and Chevy Corvette, appears in Car and Driver’s Top Ten for both 1985 and 2009. Even the concept cars look very similar from then to now.

    Reply
    • Guest says:
      February 11, 2010 at 6:15 pm

      What advances do you want? A Humvee should not be looked at as a tactical attack vehicle. A Humvee provides Basic Transportation (BT), no more and no less. A large number of Humvees are retasked to do different roles such as Air Defense (a.k.a. the Avenger), but it essentiall serves as a BT system to move from spot to spot.

      I’m in the military and I don’t need a lot of options and “extras” that create problems. I need a simple, basic vehicle that can take a lot of damage while still working. Options and “extras” just create maintenance issues.

      Advances in auto tech for street vehicles does not directly impact military vehcile tech. If you want to show me improved protective armor for a military vehicle that came from a “street car” I would be very interested.

      Reply
  2. magnum6 says:
    February 1, 2010 at 8:52 pm

    Perhaps you meant $1.3 Billion for 8,000 Humvee’s?

    Reply
    • DavidB says:
      February 1, 2010 at 9:18 pm

      Gotta be. $1.3M divided by 8,000 means a HMMWV costs only $162? $1.3B meaning $162k/each would make sense (though overpriced).

      Reply
      • Marine1 says:
        February 1, 2010 at 10:54 pm

        Ok.… for $162.00 I will buy two. For 5 dollars more can you throw in the body armor? How much for a MK19?

        Reply
    • Christian says:
      February 1, 2010 at 9:21 pm

      yeah yeah…thank God for the internets…i can make fixes ASAP…

      Thanks

      Reply
  3. ken says:
    February 1, 2010 at 9:14 pm

    About time they got rid of the P.O.S#*%…time to buy MILITARY vehicals, not street cars.

    Reply
    • bill says:
      February 2, 2010 at 1:44 am

      how do you consider it a street car? the humvee was originaly a tach. veh. the auto makers took it and removed the great features that made it an outstanding veh. the lame ass production model is no where near what the real humvee is.

      Reply
      • Don Meaker says:
        February 2, 2010 at 5:25 am

        The GM HUMMER is a Suburban with a codpiece…

        Thanks Tam at “View from the Porch”.

        Reply
  4. Josh says:
    February 1, 2010 at 9:18 pm

    Just because an automaker fashioned a line of vehicles AFTER the humvee doesn’t make it a street car. Despite some of its issues it is still one of the better light tactical vehicles in service.

    Reply
  5. solomon says:
    February 1, 2010 at 10:40 pm

    I don’t quite understand this. From what I’ve read the Marine Corps is considering using the HUMVEE instead of the JLTV…the Commandant has called it over weight etc…Is this just the Army talking or does it cover everyone?

    Reply
    • clowe says:
      February 2, 2010 at 1:58 pm

      It was Pentagon comptroller, so I assume it means everyone. Corps will stick with what they have now and get more M-ATVs until JLTV.

      Reply
  6. Joe says:
    February 1, 2010 at 11:57 pm

    Ok, their going to spend $1.3 Billion dollars on a vehicle thats being phased out of the system…Hmmm…
    Why not just purchase What ever the amount of M-ATV’s they can afford with the $1.3 Billion (Which probably would be 1/3 of the 8000 HUMVEES), but at least you would have a Vehicle that would be “Purpose” Built for combat and ready to be deployed instead of 8000 Hummers that will eventually make their way to the Army/ Navy Store in a few years.
    Why replace just for the sake of replacing 1 for 1 Humvees?
    The JLTV might be here some day, and then what ya gonna do with them 8000 Hummers you bought, parked and forgot about?

    Reply
  7. FormerDirtDart says:
    February 2, 2010 at 12:18 am

    Christian,
    Doesn’t $1 million seem a tad low for war loss replacement costs?

    Reply
  8. stephen russell says:
    February 2, 2010 at 1:13 am

    How much for a Ued Hummer (any service use).,
    Nice
    Can I get one locally via our NG base or nearby Recruitting Center?
    Love the van types & the roof mounted gun units models.

    Reply
  9. Guinevere says:
    February 2, 2010 at 1:51 am

    :) Ah, how to take down something from it’s throne LOL

    Reply
  10. jsallison says:
    February 1, 2010 at 9:07 pm

    Cramped? You’ve obviously never ridden in the back seat of a 151 loaded for a 6 hr patrol of the IGB, in February. A 6 hour tour…

    Reply
    • haloguy628 says:
      February 2, 2010 at 3:31 pm

      I bet he’s now frantically searching the web trying to find out what’s this “151” you’ve been talking about.

      Reply
  11. jim says:
    February 1, 2010 at 9:32 pm

    Auto tech has stagnated. But so have passenger planes and trains. So have a lot of things. So have houses and apartments.

    Radical changes (especially when it comes to moving thousands of pounds of stuff) require fundamental breakthroughs — like bigger, better, cheaper fuel sources, breakthroughs in physics or materials science, stuff like that. After each breakthrough normal engineers are pretty good at exploring the state space and finding the best uses.

    Reply
  12. pilsner says:
    February 1, 2010 at 10:52 pm

    No you can NOT by a used military humvee. In order to be sold to the public a military item must be “demilitarized”, a process that essentially destroys the vehicle. The old ones will be pawned off on our NG, Reserve, and NATO friends first and then when they are so broken down that they can not be refitted/pawned off again they will broken down for scrap. The other problem is that military vehicles are not DOT legal to drive on the street; lack of safety features, too dim lighting systems and whatnot.

    Here is a website with more details: http://​www​.olive​-drab​.com/​o​d​_​m​v​g​_​h​m​m​w​v​_​h​o​w​t​o​b​u​y​.​p​hp3

    You CAN, however, get used military versions of civilian vehicles — i.e. old K5 blazers, big 3 made sedans, forklifts and etc. or you can go through a european dealer and get used NATO versions of civilian vehicles — i.e. land rovers from the brits, unimogs from the germans and others. But those are basically street legal vehicles that are stripped of creature comforts and painted green. In the Mid-1990’s a very few of them were sold to an equipment manufacturer by the USMC. Some of them are still floating around but they are in the 17-25k price range.

    hope that helps!

    Reply
    • Terry says:
      February 17, 2010 at 9:10 pm

      You over generalize. Lots of mil items are sold to the public, just stop in you’re local surplus store. And according to the web site you provided, there are HUMMV’s out there.

      Reply
  13. chris says:
    February 2, 2010 at 3:55 am

    Is the whole armed services switching over or just the army?

    Reply
  14. Iceman says:
    February 2, 2010 at 7:55 pm

    I heard the next vehicle to replace the Hummer will be made by china called the
    在垃圾的出售一 walmart. Just you wait and see

    Reply
  15. seabeenut says:
    February 4, 2010 at 10:56 am

    Maybe they are going to quit buying the Humvee since General Motors sold the brand to China!

    Reply
    • Reddog says:
      February 17, 2010 at 5:56 am

      Maybe it’s because the Government took over GM and doesn’t want to be responsible for any Humvee asociated problems!!!

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • Ft. Irwin, Where You At?
      I was the driver for BoB Gaygos, B Co 6/31st Commander....
      Ricky houltzhouser
    • Ft. Irwin, Where You At?
      Luis, I was Captain Gaydos, driver Sgt. Houltzhouser in...
      Ricky Houltzhouser
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      If you really want to win the war permanently, it will...
      steven
    • Cover Your Computer Mics and WebCams
      Another question, how would I physically obstruct the...
      Curious
    • Cover Your Computer Mics and WebCams
      whats a good way to physically cover my laptop webcam?...
      Curious
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      But, the Eurotrash airplane ISN'T better… The Boeing...
      WillyPete
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Gee, I wonder why? Oh! Maybe it's because the...
      WillyPete
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      It would also help, a LOT to 'limit' excess...
      WillyPete
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      And flush ALL those dollars already spent down the...
      WillyPete
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      My personal experience being on the ground in less...
      shark60
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage