<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2010/03/12/army-fast-tracks-gps-mortar-round/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/12/army-fast-tracks-gps-mortar-round/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:29:34 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: J.D.</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/12/army-fast-tracks-gps-mortar-round/#comment-196462</link> <dc:creator>J.D.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:26:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=6120#comment-196462</guid> <description>As long as China and other countries agree to keep sending us the ammo even if our dispute is with them then it should be ok to import our defense systems... This is in keeping with our &quot;box of rocks&quot; policy decisions. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as China and other countries agree to keep sending us the ammo even if our dispute is with them then it should be ok to import our defense systems… This is in keeping with our “box of rocks” policy decisions.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Soldier Medic</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/12/army-fast-tracks-gps-mortar-round/#comment-196445</link> <dc:creator>Soldier Medic </dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:55:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=6120#comment-196445</guid> <description>good answer Musson </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good answer Musson</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Soldier Medic</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/12/army-fast-tracks-gps-mortar-round/#comment-196444</link> <dc:creator>Soldier Medic</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:53:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=6120#comment-196444</guid> <description>beside yall dont need that high teck stuff. leave the reading to the ARMY and the ARMY AIR CORPS, oh I AM SORRY I MEANT AIR FORCE. LOLOLOLOL. JUST PLAYING OF COURSE </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>beside yall dont need that high teck stuff. leave the reading to the ARMY and the ARMY AIR CORPS, oh I AM SORRY I MEANT AIR FORCE. LOLOLOLOL. JUST PLAYING OF COURSE</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Channon</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/12/army-fast-tracks-gps-mortar-round/#comment-196432</link> <dc:creator>Channon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:37:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=6120#comment-196432</guid> <description>Jim you&#039;re right. I was there too with C co 1-32 and at the mortar pits hieght of power there was two 81mm there. The was never a 120mm. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim you’re right. I was there too with C co 1–32 and at the mortar pits hieght of power there was two 81mm there. The was never a 120mm.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jim</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/12/army-fast-tracks-gps-mortar-round/#comment-196378</link> <dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:56:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=6120#comment-196378</guid> <description>That is not a 120mm mortar please check it out. My was 11C for 20 years and that a 81mm Mortar M252. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is not a 120mm mortar please check it out. My was 11C for 20 years and that a 81mm Mortar M252.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bduff509</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/12/army-fast-tracks-gps-mortar-round/#comment-196375</link> <dc:creator>bduff509</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:48:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=6120#comment-196375</guid> <description>Would I be correct in assuming that means a noise or flash suppressor? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would I be correct in assuming that means a noise or flash suppressor?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gunnery Instructor</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/12/army-fast-tracks-gps-mortar-round/#comment-196301</link> <dc:creator>Gunnery Instructor</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:43:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=6120#comment-196301</guid> <description>I beg to differ about mortar being more accurate that ARTY.  It&#039;s a crap shoot right now.  Mortarmen chunk the rounds down range and have no idea where they will impact.  It&#039;s great that the rate of fire is high, but ONE SHOT -ONE KILL is the way to go.  A GPS guided mortar round will help mortarmen achieve accurate first round fire for effect. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I beg to differ about mortar being more accurate that ARTY.  It’s a crap shoot right now.  Mortarmen chunk the rounds down range and have no idea where they will impact.  It’s great that the rate of fire is high, but ONE SHOT –ONE KILL is the way to go.  A GPS guided mortar round will help mortarmen achieve accurate first round fire for effect.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gunnery Instr</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/12/army-fast-tracks-gps-mortar-round/#comment-196300</link> <dc:creator>Gunnery Instr</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:38:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=6120#comment-196300</guid> <description>The cost would likely (eventually) be much less than the Excalibur round.  Excalibur has quite a bit more capabilities than this would need.  This is more like a PGK fuze technology used in a mortar body.  PGK is just a fuze that can turn a regular artillery round into a gps guided munition.  It has a much better CEP than conventional rounds but not quite as much as Excalibur, and is not nearly as expensive. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cost would likely (eventually) be much less than the Excalibur round.  Excalibur has quite a bit more capabilities than this would need.  This is more like a PGK fuze technology used in a mortar body.  PGK is just a fuze that can turn a regular artillery round into a gps guided munition.  It has a much better CEP than conventional rounds but not quite as much as Excalibur, and is not nearly as expensive.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bob Voelsing</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/12/army-fast-tracks-gps-mortar-round/#comment-196279</link> <dc:creator>Bob Voelsing</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:12:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=6120#comment-196279</guid> <description>SHOT OVER,,,,Wow you now have a 120mm mortar that can be &quot;guided&quot; by satelite?? In my day, we had old 4.2in.&amp; 81mm dumb rounds in our AO. The Grunts called for Echo of the 1/6th,198th Bde.,,&#039;cause we were faster than Arty.,,usually more accurate &amp; would keep firing &#039;til the tube darn near melted (wrapped with towels &amp;poured water over them),,Why?? &#039;cause the grunts lives depended on us. My gunner, Lonnie, would carry 10 old style 81mm rds. 2 in ea.leg pocket,1 in ea.pants pocket &amp; 1 in ea.hand,pins pulled. he would fire so fast,that he had them all gone &#039;fore the first hit,even at close range. The Grunts on the radio were cheering for us to keep it coming &amp; we did &#039;til we almost ran out of ammo late that night &amp; any night they called. I know &#039;cause I was the Fire Mission &quot;Computer&quot; all done with maps,rulers, scales, A book &amp; Manual Sights &amp;Lights,,now you have Guided 5&quot; mortars???Wow,Shot Out</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SHOT OVER„„Wow you now have a 120mm mortar that can be “guided” by satelite?? In my day, we had old 4.2in.&amp;<br /> 81mm dumb rounds in our AO. The Grunts called for Echo<br /> of the 1/6th,198th Bde.„’cause we were faster than Arty.„usually more accurate &amp; would keep firing ’til the tube darn near melted (wrapped with towels &amp;poured water over them)„Why?? ’cause the grunts lives depended on us. My gunner, Lonnie, would carry 10 old style 81mm rds. 2 in ea.leg pocket,1 in ea.pants pocket<br /> &amp; 1 in ea.hand,pins pulled. he would fire so fast,that he had them all gone ‘fore the first hit,even at close range. The Grunts on the radio were cheering for us to keep it coming &amp; we did ’til we almost ran out of ammo late that night &amp; any night they called. I know ’cause I was the Fire Mission “Computer” all done with maps,rulers, scales, A book &amp; Manual Sights &amp;Lights„now you have Guided 5″ mortars???Wow,Shot Out</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gary V</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/12/army-fast-tracks-gps-mortar-round/#comment-196200</link> <dc:creator>Gary V</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:26:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=6120#comment-196200</guid> <description>bduff509, I believe that&#039;s a BAD. Blast Attenuation Device. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bduff509, I believe that’s a BAD. Blast Attenuation Device.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.003 seconds using apc
Object Caching 743/747 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 05:53:45 -->
