<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: DOD Says No Dice on Renaming Dept. of Navy the “Dept. of Navy and Marine Corps”</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2010/06/07/dod-says-no-dice-on-renaming-dept-of-navy-the-dept-of-navy-and-marine-corps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/06/07/dod-says-no-dice-on-renaming-dept-of-navy-the-dept-of-navy-and-marine-corps/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:06:43 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: SEAL76</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/06/07/dod-says-no-dice-on-renaming-dept-of-navy-the-dept-of-navy-and-marine-corps/#comment-203024</link> <dc:creator>SEAL76</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 00:21:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=7521#comment-203024</guid> <description>What the hell are you talking about? &quot;SERVICES&quot; . These Naval and Marine personnel are warriors. They don&#039;t belong to a service industry. No Change is needed except to change the president as soon as legally possible. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the hell are you talking about? “SERVICES” . These Naval and Marine personnel are warriors. They don’t belong to a service industry. No Change is needed except to change the president as soon as legally possible.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SEAL76</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/06/07/dod-says-no-dice-on-renaming-dept-of-navy-the-dept-of-navy-and-marine-corps/#comment-203022</link> <dc:creator>SEAL76</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 00:18:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=7521#comment-203022</guid> <description>The United States Marine Corps will never become part of the Army. As for Obama and logic those two words should never be used in the same sentence other than this one. Obama does not know how to apply logic to solve a problem or to do anything else. He is an absolute babe in the woods except when it comes to Chicago Politics. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States Marine Corps will never become part of the Army. As for Obama and logic those two words should never be used in the same sentence other than this one. Obama does not know how to apply logic to solve a problem or to do anything else. He is an absolute babe in the woods except when it comes to Chicago Politics.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Phil</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/06/07/dod-says-no-dice-on-renaming-dept-of-navy-the-dept-of-navy-and-marine-corps/#comment-202960</link> <dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 17:43:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=7521#comment-202960</guid> <description>rumour around the Beltway is that Obama has directed SecDef to order the Marine Corps to change the Marines&#039; Hymn from &quot;from the halls of Montezuma to the shores of Tripoli&quot; because it offends Mexicans and Arabs </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rumour around the Beltway is that Obama has directed SecDef to order the Marine Corps to change the Marines’ Hymn from “from the halls of Montezuma to the shores of Tripoli” because it offends Mexicans and Arabs</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: AT4</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/06/07/dod-says-no-dice-on-renaming-dept-of-navy-the-dept-of-navy-and-marine-corps/#comment-202948</link> <dc:creator>AT4</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:40:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=7521#comment-202948</guid> <description>Yeah that tends to happen when your flanks aren&#039;t covered by late arrivals. Pesky insurgents just bypass and reoccupy. Joint ops suck. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah that tends to happen when your flanks aren’t covered by late arrivals. Pesky insurgents just bypass and reoccupy. Joint ops suck.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SFC S</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/06/07/dod-says-no-dice-on-renaming-dept-of-navy-the-dept-of-navy-and-marine-corps/#comment-202928</link> <dc:creator>SFC S</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 13:11:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=7521#comment-202928</guid> <description>This former Marine (current Soldier) thinks this was a poor idea from the get-go; regardless of the originator. I also can&#039;t see the Corps being rolled into the Army: the culture shock would tear the Army apart and lead to even more balkanization within the Army than we have now. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This former Marine (current Soldier) thinks this was a poor idea from the get-go; regardless of the originator. I also can’t see the Corps being rolled into the Army: the culture shock would tear the Army apart and lead to even more balkanization within the Army than we have now.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kevin</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/06/07/dod-says-no-dice-on-renaming-dept-of-navy-the-dept-of-navy-and-marine-corps/#comment-202908</link> <dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 07:32:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=7521#comment-202908</guid> <description>Why the hell don&#039;t they just give the Marines their own department? I&#039;ve never understood that. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the hell don’t they just give the Marines their own department? I’ve never understood that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Foxops</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/06/07/dod-says-no-dice-on-renaming-dept-of-navy-the-dept-of-navy-and-marine-corps/#comment-202882</link> <dc:creator>Foxops</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 01:58:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=7521#comment-202882</guid> <description>Agreed, no urine necessary.  I haven&#039;t read the book, but I was there.  I remember having to reclear areas that the Army &quot;cleared&quot;. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, no urine necessary.  I haven’t read the book, but I was there.  I remember having to reclear areas that the Army “cleared”.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jsallison</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/06/07/dod-says-no-dice-on-renaming-dept-of-navy-the-dept-of-navy-and-marine-corps/#comment-202880</link> <dc:creator>jsallison</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 01:45:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=7521#comment-202880</guid> <description>The War Department and the Department of the Navy got WWII done.  Just sayin...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The War Department and the Department of the Navy got WWII done.  Just sayin…</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Clement</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/06/07/dod-says-no-dice-on-renaming-dept-of-navy-the-dept-of-navy-and-marine-corps/#comment-202848</link> <dc:creator>Clement</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 21:05:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=7521#comment-202848</guid> <description>First you say the &quot;Democrat Communists&quot; want to &quot;divide and conquer&quot;, and then you propose that we should get rid of the Army and the Air Force.  Forgive me if I think that your comments result from blind hypocrisy and do not make any sense whatsoever. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First you say the “Democrat Communists” want to “divide and conquer”, and then you propose that we should get rid of the Army and the Air Force.  Forgive me if I think that your comments result from blind hypocrisy and do not make any sense whatsoever.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Clement</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/06/07/dod-says-no-dice-on-renaming-dept-of-navy-the-dept-of-navy-and-marine-corps/#comment-202847</link> <dc:creator>Clement</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 20:58:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=7521#comment-202847</guid> <description>First of all, this article has nothing to do with the President so I don&#039;t understand why we&#039;re even talking about him.  Bob, Congress would never allow the Marine Corps to be folded into the Army, and i&#039;m pretty sure the President wouldn&#039;t go to any such lengths to destroy the Marine Corps as an institution, an institution that has a proud history and its own way of doing things.  As for Praetorian&#039;s comment about health reform, you clearly don&#039;t know jack if that&#039;s your interpretation of what health reform was about.  First of all obama pushed for a public option which the right accused of being too socialist.  If the public option had passed, those customers would be government clients, not private insurance customers.  As for our Constitution, the Constitution is a great document but is hardly flawless.  A system that was never able to pass basic civil rights legislation called the &quot;Equal Rights Amendment&quot; obviously has serious problems. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, this article has nothing to do with the President so I don’t understand why we’re even talking about him.  Bob, Congress would never allow the Marine Corps to be folded into the Army, and i’m pretty sure the President wouldn’t go to any such lengths to destroy the Marine Corps as an institution, an institution that has a proud history and its own way of doing things.  As for Praetorian’s comment about health reform, you clearly don’t know jack if that’s your interpretation of what health reform was about.  First of all obama pushed for a public option which the right accused of being too socialist.  If the public option had passed, those customers would be government clients, not private insurance customers.  As for our Constitution, the Constitution is a great document but is hardly flawless.  A system that was never able to pass basic civil rights legislation called the “Equal Rights Amendment” obviously has serious problems.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.003 seconds using apc
Object Caching 743/747 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 04:31:15 -->
