Comments on: China to Test Carrier Killing Missile On Fourth of July? http://defensetech.org/2010/06/30/china-to-test-carrier-killing-missile-on-fourth-of-july/ The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security Sat, 26 May 2012 06:20:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Jon http://defensetech.org/2010/06/30/china-to-test-carrier-killing-missile-on-fourth-of-july/#comment-212941 Jon Tue, 19 Oct 2010 07:15:27 +0000 http://defensetech.org/?p=7987#comment-212941 Your comparing it to the cuban missle crisis. T hat is idiotic. There was a protest because they were deploying NUCLEAR WEAPONS no shit we protested im pretty sure anyone would Your comparing it to the cuban missle crisis. T hat is idiotic. There was a protest because they were deploying NUCLEAR WEAPONS no shit we protested im pretty sure anyone would

]]> By: Jeff http://defensetech.org/2010/06/30/china-to-test-carrier-killing-missile-on-fourth-of-july/#comment-208873 Jeff Thu, 12 Aug 2010 01:41:05 +0000 http://defensetech.org/?p=7987#comment-208873 China is more capitalist than we are, so it hardly qualifies as a Communist country anymore. Sure, it's got a one-party system that doesn't look kindly upon political dissent, but hey, we are practically a one-party state as well, and look at what freedom of expression has brought us: reams of useless talk but little actually gets done. So yeah, you wonder why we are descending? Why don't we just be honest for a minute here: China is huge, growing fast, and we are frankly afraid of them and plain jealous. China is more capitalist than we are, so it hardly qualifies as a Communist country anymore. Sure, it’s got a one-party system that doesn’t look kindly upon political dissent, but hey, we are practically a one-party state as well, and look at what freedom of expression has brought us: reams of useless talk but little actually gets done. So yeah, you wonder why we are descending? Why don’t we just be honest for a minute here: China is huge, growing fast, and we are frankly afraid of them and plain jealous.

]]> By: Jeff http://defensetech.org/2010/06/30/china-to-test-carrier-killing-missile-on-fourth-of-july/#comment-208496 Jeff Sat, 07 Aug 2010 02:51:48 +0000 http://defensetech.org/?p=7987#comment-208496 Because we are a bunch of thumb-sucking, spoiled, lazy, fat, mean-spirited dimwits. Welcome to the New America. We are nothing like our grandfather's generation. We have developed such a sense of entitlement that we think it's our birth right to be NUMBER ONE, as opposed to good old fashioned hard work. Because we are a bunch of thumb-sucking, spoiled, lazy, fat, mean-spirited dimwits. Welcome to the New America. We are nothing like our grandfather’s generation. We have developed such a sense of entitlement that we think it’s our birth right to be NUMBER ONE, as opposed to good old fashioned hard work.

]]> By: Søren http://defensetech.org/2010/06/30/china-to-test-carrier-killing-missile-on-fourth-of-july/#comment-207042 Søren Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:39:18 +0000 http://defensetech.org/?p=7987#comment-207042 As an outsider (European) I don´t get you guys. You would rather have your country suffer defeat than have a president you oppose succeed. Why is that? No matter who is PM in my country, the country goes first, partisan politics goes second. That´s my two cent´s. As an outsider (European) I don´t get you guys. You would rather have your country suffer defeat than have a president you oppose succeed. Why is that? No matter who is PM in my country, the country goes first, partisan politics goes second. That´s my two cent´s.

]]> By: Jeff http://defensetech.org/2010/06/30/china-to-test-carrier-killing-missile-on-fourth-of-july/#comment-206657 Jeff Thu, 15 Jul 2010 01:57:00 +0000 http://defensetech.org/?p=7987#comment-206657 1) "Can't you do the math? The Chinese lost in 3 weeks more than half of the US casualties after.... 10 years in Vietnam... " Stop making **** up, "Uncle Tom". The Chinese lost 26,000 lives, we lost 58,159. Can you even do math? Wait, I think I know the answer. 2) " Last I checked, we have thousands more nukes and able to send them at moments faster than China can say 'uncle Jeff''." How many nukes does it take to obliterate the US? Two dozen is enough to take out all of our major urban centers, and since we are an urbanized society, the damage would be huge. I was right, you are a suicidal maniac; and I hope your stupidity is not hereditary. Do you have any kids? No? Good. 1) “Can’t you do the math? The Chinese lost in 3 weeks more than half of the US casualties after.… 10 years in Vietnam… “
Stop making **** up, “Uncle Tom”. The Chinese lost 26,000 lives, we lost 58,159. Can you even do math? Wait, I think I know the answer.

2) ” Last I checked, we have thousands more nukes and able to send them at moments faster than China can say ‘uncle Jeff”.“
How many nukes does it take to obliterate the US? Two dozen is enough to take out all of our major urban centers, and since we are an urbanized society, the damage would be huge. I was right, you are a suicidal maniac; and I hope your stupidity is not hereditary. Do you have any kids? No? Good.

]]> By: Jeff http://defensetech.org/2010/06/30/china-to-test-carrier-killing-missile-on-fourth-of-july/#comment-206656 Jeff Thu, 15 Jul 2010 01:47:15 +0000 http://defensetech.org/?p=7987#comment-206656 I hope your stupidity is not hereditary. Do you have any kids? I hope your stupidity is not hereditary. Do you have any kids?

]]> By: Tom http://defensetech.org/2010/06/30/china-to-test-carrier-killing-missile-on-fourth-of-july/#comment-206613 Tom Wed, 14 Jul 2010 04:48:43 +0000 http://defensetech.org/?p=7987#comment-206613 "Just how exactly did we fare any better against the Vietnamese?" - Can't you do the math? The Chinese lost in 3 weeks more than half of the US casualties after.... 10 years in Vietnam... "Last I checked, the Chinese have nukes and the delivery vehicles to send them half way around the world over North America..." - Last I checked, we have thousands more nukes and able to send them at moments faster than China can say 'uncle Jeff''. “Just how exactly did we fare any better against the Vietnamese?“
– Can’t you do the math? The Chinese lost in 3 weeks more than half of the US casualties after.… 10 years in Vietnam…

“Last I checked, the Chinese have nukes and the delivery vehicles to send them half way around the world over North America…“
– Last I checked, we have thousands more nukes and able to send them at moments faster than China can say ‘uncle Jeff”.

]]> By: Jeff http://defensetech.org/2010/06/30/china-to-test-carrier-killing-missile-on-fourth-of-july/#comment-206607 Jeff Wed, 14 Jul 2010 02:25:22 +0000 http://defensetech.org/?p=7987#comment-206607 "By the way, China's misadventure into Vietnam in 1979 still remained a sore point for their military." - Just how exactly did we fare any better against the Vietnamese? "that would also mean the destruction of Hainan Island, base of the "secret" nuclear submarine(s) and their southern fleet... And then there are so many other "targets" along China's coast all within range for retaliation." - Last I checked, the Chinese have nukes and the delivery vehicles to send them half way around the world over North America. You may have a nuclear shelter, but most of your fellow countrymen do not. Another thing: most your countrymen, myself included, are not suicidal or born a dumbass like you. “By the way, China’s misadventure into Vietnam in 1979 still remained a sore point for their military.“
– Just how exactly did we fare any better against the Vietnamese?

“that would also mean the destruction of Hainan Island, base of the “secret” nuclear submarine(s) and their southern fleet… And then there are so many other “targets” along China’s coast all within range for retaliation.”

- Last I checked, the Chinese have nukes and the delivery vehicles to send them half way around the world over North America. You may have a nuclear shelter, but most of your fellow countrymen do not. Another thing: most your countrymen, myself included, are not suicidal or born a dumbass like you.

]]> By: Jeff http://defensetech.org/2010/06/30/china-to-test-carrier-killing-missile-on-fourth-of-july/#comment-206606 Jeff Wed, 14 Jul 2010 02:07:27 +0000 http://defensetech.org/?p=7987#comment-206606 I think the sensor package would include some kind of OHR (over-the-horizon radar) capability so they know where to point the satellites to look for the carriers. The Chinese are known to be refining OHR technologies, which are very promising due to advances in computing power. I read (don't remember where) they could have a working system deployed before the decade is out or even sooner. However, OHR installations are huge and easy to locate. It'd be advisable to take them out before sending in our carriers. I think the sensor package would include some kind of OHR (over-the-horizon radar) capability so they know where to point the satellites to look for the carriers. The Chinese are known to be refining OHR technologies, which are very promising due to advances in computing power. I read (don’t remember where) they could have a working system deployed before the decade is out or even sooner.
However, OHR installations are huge and easy to locate. It’d be advisable to take them out before sending in our carriers.

]]> By: Jeff http://defensetech.org/2010/06/30/china-to-test-carrier-killing-missile-on-fourth-of-july/#comment-206605 Jeff Wed, 14 Jul 2010 02:06:15 +0000 http://defensetech.org/?p=7987#comment-206605 Does China have nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them at intercontinental range? If you answer no, you are a dumbass. If you answer yes, then you are a lunatic. Never mind, you are a dumbass. Does China have nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them at intercontinental range? If you answer no, you are a dumbass. If you answer yes, then you are a lunatic.
Never mind, you are a dumbass.

]]>