<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mercedes-Benz Unveils Snazzy New Armored Patrol Vehicle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2010/07/07/mercedes-benz-unveils-new-armored-patrol-vehicle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/07/07/mercedes-benz-unveils-new-armored-patrol-vehicle/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 06:20:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: shawn1999</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/07/07/mercedes-benz-unveils-new-armored-patrol-vehicle/#comment-206386</link>
		<dc:creator>shawn1999</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=8088#comment-206386</guid>
		<description>Yes, scrap the whole thing, its a bad color. While we are at it, will someone tear down the San Francisco Bay Bridge too? Its just as bad color-wise. Should have gone with the Navy&#039;s Black&amp;Yellow striped scheme..... 
 
But seriously..... 
Considering each buyer is going to paint the thing their own camo colors anyway, does it really matter what color the trim is? I&#039;m sure that MB would be happy to paint it whatever color the buyer wants anyway. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, scrap the whole thing, its a bad color. While we are at it, will someone tear down the San Francisco Bay Bridge too? Its just as bad color-wise. Should have gone with the Navy’s Black&amp;Yellow striped scheme.…. </p>
<p>But seriously.….<br />
Considering each buyer is going to paint the thing their own camo colors anyway, does it really matter what color the trim is? I’m sure that MB would be happy to paint it whatever color the buyer wants anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k9Rico</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/07/07/mercedes-benz-unveils-new-armored-patrol-vehicle/#comment-206380</link>
		<dc:creator>k9Rico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=8088#comment-206380</guid>
		<description>If its like my Benz the oil changes will bankrupt the country quicker than the leadership.  Do you also get a loaner Benz when its in the shop?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If its like my Benz the oil changes will bankrupt the country quicker than the leadership.  Do you also get a loaner Benz when its in the shop?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davis</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/07/07/mercedes-benz-unveils-new-armored-patrol-vehicle/#comment-206369</link>
		<dc:creator>Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 12:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=8088#comment-206369</guid>
		<description>and I love stereos. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and I love stereos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davis</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/07/07/mercedes-benz-unveils-new-armored-patrol-vehicle/#comment-206368</link>
		<dc:creator>Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 12:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=8088#comment-206368</guid>
		<description>I actually don&#039;t mind the orange. Mainly because I am not in the military. If I ever get lost on a camping trip, I want to be spotted easily. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually don’t mind the orange. Mainly because I am not in the military. If I ever get lost on a camping trip, I want to be spotted easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DevilPup</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/07/07/mercedes-benz-unveils-new-armored-patrol-vehicle/#comment-206358</link>
		<dc:creator>DevilPup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 03:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=8088#comment-206358</guid>
		<description>no, your thinking of the LM 2002 wich was unrelated to the Hummer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no, your thinking of the LM 2002 wich was unrelated to the Hummer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mat</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/07/07/mercedes-benz-unveils-new-armored-patrol-vehicle/#comment-206342</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 22:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=8088#comment-206342</guid>
		<description>wheels ,suspension and hydraulic motor painted that way only to show new features mainly new fully adjustable long-travel hydraulic suspension so people notice what is actually different from  Enok.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wheels ‚suspension and hydraulic motor painted that way only to show new features mainly new fully adjustable long-travel hydraulic suspension so people notice what is actually different from  Enok.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mat</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/07/07/mercedes-benz-unveils-new-armored-patrol-vehicle/#comment-206341</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 22:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=8088#comment-206341</guid>
		<description>G-wagen and Land rover are unlike Hummer or T98 Kombat or MRAPS more general purpose light wehicles(like the old jeep was) that have much lower logistical foot print and are much better adapted to hilly and /or wooded terrain and narrow mountain roads.  
T98 kombat or an Hummer H2 are civilian play toys and great for mexican drug lords but usles for militay use. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G-wagen and Land rover are unlike Hummer or T98 Kombat or MRAPS more general purpose light wehicles(like the old jeep was) that have much lower logistical foot print and are much better adapted to hilly and /or wooded terrain and narrow mountain roads.<br />
T98 kombat or an Hummer H2 are civilian play toys and great for mexican drug lords but usles for militay use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mat</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/07/07/mercedes-benz-unveils-new-armored-patrol-vehicle/#comment-206340</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 21:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=8088#comment-206340</guid>
		<description>Its there just to draw atention to new features in the drive train namely hydraulic suspension </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its there just to draw atention to new features in the drive train namely hydraulic suspension</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lightfighter223</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/07/07/mercedes-benz-unveils-new-armored-patrol-vehicle/#comment-206314</link>
		<dc:creator>lightfighter223</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 17:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=8088#comment-206314</guid>
		<description>Dave, 
 
I am sure they thought of that when they deliver it to their buyers.  The orange is a nice contrast to the paint and the background.   
 
Comment=stupid </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, </p>
<p>I am sure they thought of that when they deliver it to their buyers.  The orange is a nice contrast to the paint and the background.   </p>
<p>Comment=stupid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vejadu</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/07/07/mercedes-benz-unveils-new-armored-patrol-vehicle/#comment-206287</link>
		<dc:creator>Vejadu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 15:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=8088#comment-206287</guid>
		<description>I prefer the T-98 Kombat. It&#039;s tested, nimble, robust and has a wide variety of armor / weapons packages. And did I mention that the price is almost reasonable? 
 
Linky:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://sportscarforums.com/f11/hummer-h2-sut-vs-combat-t98-8063.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://sportscarforums.com/f11/hummer-h2-sut-vs-c...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer the T-98 Kombat. It’s tested, nimble, robust and has a wide variety of armor / weapons packages. And did I mention that the price is almost reasonable? </p>
<p>Linky:  <a href="http://sportscarforums.com/f11/hummer-h2-sut-vs-combat-t98-8063.html" target="_blank">http://sportscarforums.com/f11/hummer-h2-sut-vs-c…</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

