<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Russia to Remain Number Two Fighter Exporter to 2013</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2010/07/23/russia-to-remain-number-two-fighter-exporter-to-2013/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/07/23/russia-to-remain-number-two-fighter-exporter-to-2013/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:06:43 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Enthusiast</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/07/23/russia-to-remain-number-two-fighter-exporter-to-2013/#comment-207904</link> <dc:creator>Enthusiast</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 10:24:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=8352#comment-207904</guid> <description>&gt;Russian avionics may be pretty poor and the Indians have had plenty of maintainability problems Wrong. Indians bought Russian radar and electronic equipment which they prefered over some Israeli-made stuff. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;Russian avionics may be pretty poor and the Indians have had plenty of maintainability problems</p><p>Wrong. Indians bought Russian radar and electronic equipment which they prefered over some Israeli-made stuff.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Enthusiast</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/07/23/russia-to-remain-number-two-fighter-exporter-to-2013/#comment-207903</link> <dc:creator>Enthusiast</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 10:22:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=8352#comment-207903</guid> <description>Latest Su-35 have reduced radar cross section by many times.  They used composites and some radar absorbent materials. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Latest Su-35 have reduced radar cross section by many times.  They used composites and some radar absorbent materials.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: zap</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/07/23/russia-to-remain-number-two-fighter-exporter-to-2013/#comment-207240</link> <dc:creator>zap</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 19:33:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=8352#comment-207240</guid> <description>It could be a $ value not numbers </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could be a $ value not numbers</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: blight</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/07/23/russia-to-remain-number-two-fighter-exporter-to-2013/#comment-207228</link> <dc:creator>blight</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 10:10:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=8352#comment-207228</guid> <description>To be fair, every single arms manufacturer is infidel. Except Iran. But they&#039;re Shia, not Sunni, so maybe they&#039;re a little better or a little worse. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, every single arms manufacturer is infidel. Except Iran. But they’re Shia, not Sunni, so maybe they’re a little better or a little worse.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: William C.</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/07/23/russia-to-remain-number-two-fighter-exporter-to-2013/#comment-207222</link> <dc:creator>William C.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 04:40:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=8352#comment-207222</guid> <description>Russian avionics may be pretty poor and the Indians have had plenty of maintainability problems, but they sure can make a very good looking plane and give it a great paint-job. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russian avionics may be pretty poor and the Indians have had plenty of maintainability problems, but they sure can make a very good looking plane and give it a great paint-job.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: praetorian</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/07/23/russia-to-remain-number-two-fighter-exporter-to-2013/#comment-207199</link> <dc:creator>praetorian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:36:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=8352#comment-207199</guid> <description>The Su series from Su-27 to SU-30mki &amp; 35&#039;s are all very big aircraft,with a big radar cross section. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Su series from Su-27 to SU-30mki &amp; 35’s are all very big aircraft,with a big radar cross<br /> section.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: praetorian</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/07/23/russia-to-remain-number-two-fighter-exporter-to-2013/#comment-207197</link> <dc:creator>praetorian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 20:52:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=8352#comment-207197</guid> <description>They might be including Helo&#039;s with this total. From what i know we have sold and selling blawkhawks to Taiwan. Thats part of that recent arms deal that China is upset about. Also we are selling AH-1 &quot;used&quot; Cobra&#039;s to Pakistan. Pakistan tries to keep there arms buying from the U.S. under wraps. They dont want thier people to know how much they buy from the  infidels. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They might be including Helo’s with this total. From what i know we have sold and<br /> selling blawkhawks to Taiwan. Thats part of that recent arms deal that China is upset about. Also we are selling AH-1 “used” Cobra’s to Pakistan. Pakistan tries to keep there arms buying from the U.S. under wraps. They dont want thier people to know how much they buy from the  infidels.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: blight</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/07/23/russia-to-remain-number-two-fighter-exporter-to-2013/#comment-207194</link> <dc:creator>blight</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 20:35:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=8352#comment-207194</guid> <description>Yes, but some numbers. Allegedly according to this article we exceeded 476 jets from 2006 to 2009... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but some numbers. Allegedly according to this article we exceeded 476 jets from 2006 to 2009…</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jacob</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/07/23/russia-to-remain-number-two-fighter-exporter-to-2013/#comment-207189</link> <dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 20:06:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=8352#comment-207189</guid> <description>I have to say, the Su-27 looks more like a &quot;generic MIG&quot; than any of the real life Mikoyan fighters. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say, the Su-27 looks more like a “generic MIG” than any of the real life Mikoyan fighters.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: praetorian</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/07/23/russia-to-remain-number-two-fighter-exporter-to-2013/#comment-207186</link> <dc:creator>praetorian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 19:59:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=8352#comment-207186</guid> <description>almost every Nato country has F-16&#039;s. Just sold 24 F-18&#039;s Super Hornets to the Aussies.  We also sold 12 F-15SG&#039;s to Singapore. C-17 has been a good export for U.S. so far, along with the C-130H&#039;s &amp; C-130J&#039;s. Since the A400M has been delayed Some Nato counties added some deliveies of C-17&#039;s &amp; C-130&#039;s. 2009 Pakistan bought 18 new F-16 Block 52&#039;s. Also Belarus is looking at Getting some surplus F-16&#039;s as well. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>almost every Nato country has F-16’s. Just sold 24 F-18’s Super Hornets to the Aussies.  We also sold 12 F-15SG’s to Singapore. C-17 has been a good export for U.S. so far, along with the C-130H’s &amp; C-130J’s. Since the A400M has been delayed<br /> Some Nato counties added some deliveies of C-17’s &amp; C-130’s. 2009 Pakistan bought 18 new F-16 Block 52’s. Also Belarus is looking at Getting some surplus F-16’s as well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.003 seconds using apc
Object Caching 743/747 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 04:25:33 -->
