Navy: USS San Antonio’s Problems May Be In the Past

Look at the this! The long troubled USS San Antonio may be at the cusp of something unprecedented in its history; working properly!

According to the Virginian-Pilot newspaper the ship has turned a corner and for the first time ever, maintenance crews are finding no major flaws with the vessel:

Adm. John C. Harvey Jr., who heads U.S. Fleet Forces, the command responsible for maintaining the Navy’s readiness, acknowledged in a recent interview that the Navy has made serious mistakes.

“Everybody flunked,” he said. “We were slow to put it all together and take the coherent set of actions that needed to be taken to get the ship squared away, so there’s been this long period of discovery.”

But Harvey also said the San Antonio has turned an important corner: For the first time, the Navy is no longer uncovering new, serious flaws, and the list of repairs is getting shorter.

Work is expected to wrap up by April, at which time the crew has been told to expect rigorous sea tests.

“We’ve reached bottom,” Harvey said. “We now know with a high degree of confidence what truly was the extent of the issues.

“I think we’ve got San Antonio figured out.”

Here’s hoping the admiral doesn’t eat those words. Remember, as the lead ship in her class, the San Antonio has had major problems throughout her five year service career.

  • Jason

    Alright, no offence to anyone, but why are we pouring money into this class of ships? As most of us know, the DoD is focusing on the USN and USAF, and NOT the Army! Do you honestly think we are going to have a ground invasion against China/Russia?! Jesus, even Gates himself said he warns against an Iraq/Afgan attack. The SoD said that! I say take the funds from this class and invest in a replacement for the DDG-51, hell, maybe even a couple of DDG-1000’s.

    • Jason

      * Sorry, I mean an ground invasion from Marines. Still, do you expect them to outnumber the Chinese Army?

    • blight

      If it’s cheaper per-hull to run a San Antonio instead of legacy platforms, or each hull can absorb the mission of more than one legacy hull, cutting hulls will save the surface force some money. However, this is rarely the case, except if legacy hulls are very high maintainence and new hulls are sufficiently low long term costs to offset high initial costs.

    • Belesari

      While i think the SanA. class are pretty much a massive f**king waste of money. Infact the whole idea behind them is dead…

      We cant attack from over 50mi out with the AMtracks they sink and are SLOW….
      Not to mention “optimal manning” aka “someone let accountants try and run military ops” MASSIVE FAILURE-dead too.

      The DDG 1000 is another massive waste and a stupid idea. a 700 ft long ship. That WILL have problems in even moderate seas thanks to its hull design. Is supposed to operate within sight of shore-remember 700 ft long-and we are only building 1 maybe 2 of the class.

      Then there is the 3rd abortion LCS. Another failure.

      A entire Decade of failures by Navy ship building and our nations leaders in this reguard.

      Yes im bitter and angry…

    • Hale

      I agree that the US probably doesn’t have the stomach to a ground invasion of China or Russia. Perhaps North Korea?

      I’d like to see the money put to better use, particularly pouring more money into the navy’s rail-gun and the Free Electron Laser research. And either retrofit those weapons onto older platforms or invest in a new platform, such as a replacement for he Zumwalt.

      In my opinion we need to be at the forefront in terms of tech since there’s no way we can match them in terms of numbers.

      • STemplar

        A rail gun doesn’t do much for us honestly. It’s interesting tech but really is a couple hundred miles of range that essential? Since the talk and name of the game is anti access and such, if we aren’t talking 1000 nmi of range the difference between rail gun ranges and naval extended range munitions now is not a big difference. R&D is fine for the present, but a really the hyper velocity prompt strike missile from existing VLS tubes is far more useful.

        The lasers will make a good defensive weapon and seem to be working fine in R&D so not sure they really need more money at this point.

  • STemplar

    Hopefully it works and is done with its ‘growing pains’. While l agree we aren’t going to launch any kind of amphib invasion of a contested coastline, we do need the ability to have forward staged maritime assault forces. You don’t need to look farther than current headlines for why we need that capacity. If the USMC command should be screaming to get out of Stan and into the anti-piracy fight, as well as, to be positioned to address the sorts of things going on in Libya and the Arab world at the moment. Those are missions tailor made for the USMC.

  • SJE

    This baby came in 0.8bil over budget, and has been plagued with problems since day one. At some stage, Northrup should be forced to eat some of the cost

    • blight

      This is why contracts ought to be fixed-price. Or at least a system to disincentivize undercutting costs. As it is, we penalize if projects come in excessively underbudget since it suggests the contractor asked for more up front to get cash up front. Conversely, this incentivises waste. Cost-plus was meant to dynamically reimburse for unexpected costs, but this has lead to all sorts of shenanigans. If a contract was cost-plus, why not stick /more/ doodads to it?

    • They did not eat a damn thing. Northrop Grumman stock has gone from 30 dollars per share to 100 dollars per share in the last 5 years. They profited from making a shit product and then got more Federal money to fix the problems. The NG tail is wagging the whole damn DOD dog !!!

  • Alex

    You get what you pay for Gulf coast ship yards build junk . There is a reason why ship building costs in that area are so low . When you use unskilled and low paid workers don’t be surprised when nothing works.

    • brian

      Sounds more like design flaws than cheap labour. If the design was bad then it doesn’t matter who built it. Even then its not cheap labour if you were working on a federal project, since you have to pay sky high wages no matter what.

  • Alberto

    We could do with one of your San Antonio class ships to assist in the Christchurch disaster…

    War is not the only role of the military…

    • STemplar

      A valid point. These vessels have very large med bays. They can produce thousands of gallons of drinking water. Have CICs that can coordinate massive ops. Aviation support. Very capable handy things to have around in disaster relief ops.

  • While I am happy they have worked out all the bugs, and do think there are valid reasons to have this type of platform; why is almost every program we have in progress turning into a complete train wreck.
    At some point it seems contractors realized there was a lot more money in screwing everything up and letting the Congressman smooth everything out.
    We simply cannot afford this type of building program and still make the numbers necessary to have a viable fleet.
    Either they are going to have to get it right and stop playing games or we as a nation will have to give up our role as world cop.
    Which sound great. Until we have to come in and straighten things out after WW3 starts.
    Call me crazy, but it has already happened twice…… Without external pressure most societies fall into the “we are strong so we will take it” pattern.
    I am sure if this were to come about the UN will issue a stern warning …..It will come in two ply for better wiping.

  • George Gauthier

    This whole class of ships should be sunk offshore to create artificial reefs that would provide habitat for fishes. That is the only likely use we will ever get from these misbegotten platforms.
    The Navy should be ashamed of boondoggles like these LPDs and the equally bad LCS.

  • JSCS

    Just curious….doing wartime pressures how where the Iowa class BB’s built and delivered so quickly? They’re certainly complex builds, as were the multitude of cruisers, DD’s, DE’s, and all the other craft put to sea at that time. Surely we’re more capable designers and engineers now than doing that time, aren’t we?

  • Bill

    From Bill–Former LI-2 1966-1967 on board USS Ozark-MCS-2__this ship had many problems also! We were a metal-minesweeper, What’s wrong with this picture? Iron men on wooden ships mine force motto! We only stayed in commission for two years, was a waste of money!

  • Christopher Pernell Thames

    I had the distinct privilege to be a Plankowner of the USS San Antonio LPD-17 Class Amphib. It was tough duty! The hardest that I have ever been through commissioning a ship!

  • Sooner or later, Google will find all new spam methods.
    In addition, the observing surgeons could transmit their comments to the operating
    surgeon, who could read them on the Google Glass monitor.

    Besides placing advertisers ads on your Blog, you can also make money Blogging by placing Google Adsense into
    your Blog.