Navy: USS San Antonio’s Problems May Be In the Past

Look at the this! The long troubled USS San Antonio may be at the cusp of something unprecedented in its history; working properly!

According to the Virginian-Pilot newspaper the ship has turned a corner and for the first time ever, maintenance crews are finding no major flaws with the vessel:

Adm. John C. Harvey Jr., who heads U.S. Fleet Forces, the command responsible for maintaining the Navy’s readiness, acknowledged in a recent interview that the Navy has made serious mistakes.

“Everybody flunked,” he said. “We were slow to put it all together and take the coherent set of actions that needed to be taken to get the ship squared away, so there’s been this long period of discovery.”

But Harvey also said the San Antonio has turned an important corner: For the first time, the Navy is no longer uncovering new, serious flaws, and the list of repairs is getting shorter.

Work is expected to wrap up by April, at which time the crew has been told to expect rigorous sea tests.

“We’ve reached bottom,” Harvey said. “We now know with a high degree of confidence what truly was the extent of the issues.

“I think we’ve got San Antonio figured out.”

Here’s hoping the admiral doesn’t eat those words. Remember, as the lead ship in her class, the San Antonio has had major problems throughout her five year service career.

11 Comments on "Navy: USS San Antonio’s Problems May Be In the Past"

  1. Alright, no offence to anyone, but why are we pouring money into this class of ships? As most of us know, the DoD is focusing on the USN and USAF, and NOT the Army! Do you honestly think we are going to have a ground invasion against China/Russia?! Jesus, even Gates himself said he warns against an Iraq/Afgan attack. The SoD said that! I say take the funds from this class and invest in a replacement for the DDG-51, hell, maybe even a couple of DDG-1000's.

  2. Hopefully it works and is done with its 'growing pains'. While l agree we aren't going to launch any kind of amphib invasion of a contested coastline, we do need the ability to have forward staged maritime assault forces. You don't need to look farther than current headlines for why we need that capacity. If the USMC command should be screaming to get out of Stan and into the anti-piracy fight, as well as, to be positioned to address the sorts of things going on in Libya and the Arab world at the moment. Those are missions tailor made for the USMC.

  3. This baby came in 0.8bil over budget, and has been plagued with problems since day one. At some stage, Northrup should be forced to eat some of the cost

  4. You get what you pay for Gulf coast ship yards build junk . There is a reason why ship building costs in that area are so low . When you use unskilled and low paid workers don't be surprised when nothing works.

  5. We could do with one of your San Antonio class ships to assist in the Christchurch disaster…

    War is not the only role of the military…

  6. While I am happy they have worked out all the bugs, and do think there are valid reasons to have this type of platform; why is almost every program we have in progress turning into a complete train wreck.
    At some point it seems contractors realized there was a lot more money in screwing everything up and letting the Congressman smooth everything out.
    We simply cannot afford this type of building program and still make the numbers necessary to have a viable fleet.
    Either they are going to have to get it right and stop playing games or we as a nation will have to give up our role as world cop.
    Which sound great. Until we have to come in and straighten things out after WW3 starts.
    Call me crazy, but it has already happened twice…… Without external pressure most societies fall into the "we are strong so we will take it" pattern.
    I am sure if this were to come about the UN will issue a stern warning …..It will come in two ply for better wiping.

  7. George Gauthier | March 1, 2011 at 12:41 pm | Reply

    This whole class of ships should be sunk offshore to create artificial reefs that would provide habitat for fishes. That is the only likely use we will ever get from these misbegotten platforms.
    The Navy should be ashamed of boondoggles like these LPDs and the equally bad LCS.

  8. Just curious….doing wartime pressures how where the Iowa class BB's built and delivered so quickly? They're certainly complex builds, as were the multitude of cruisers, DD's, DE's, and all the other craft put to sea at that time. Surely we're more capable designers and engineers now than doing that time, aren't we?

  9. From Bill–Former LI-2 1966-1967 on board USS Ozark-MCS-2__this ship had many problems also! We were a metal-minesweeper, What's wrong with this picture? Iron men on wooden ships mine force motto! We only stayed in commission for two years, was a waste of money!

  10. Christopher Pernell Thames | December 13, 2012 at 1:49 pm | Reply

    I had the distinct privilege to be a Plankowner of the USS San Antonio LPD-17 Class Amphib. It was tough duty! The hardest that I have ever been through commissioning a ship!

  11. Sooner or later, Google will find all new spam methods.
    In addition, the observing surgeons could transmit their comments to the operating
    surgeon, who could read them on the Google Glass monitor.

    Besides placing advertisers ads on your Blog, you can also make money Blogging by placing Google Adsense into
    your Blog.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*