“We were launching hypersonic bricks at Mach 5, Mach 6”

Here’s an exclusive Defense Tech video giving you an update on General Atomics’ high-speed railgun project. Last summer, General Atomics and Boeing tested a high-speed sabot round to replace the “hypersonic bricks” (which tended to tumble out of control) that the company had been firing from the gun, says General Atomics’ Tom Hurn. The sabot round went seven kilometers downrange after punching through a 1/8-inch thick steel plate. General Atomics officials estimate that they could install the weapon on a DDG-51 class destroyer by the end of the decade, according to Hurn.

  • marcase

    Make it smaller and lighter, and put it on an Abrams…

    • Bill

      or an AC-130

      • Brody

        Or a smaller one on a Bradley-type.

        • joe

          Problem with both isn’t the size or weight – it’s principally the power. DDG-51 is favoured because it has the equivalent of a small municipal electricity plant on board.

          • moose

            But the current DDGs don’t have an integrated power system to properly tap that power generation. Railguns and DEWs are going to require IPS.

          • Maxtrue

            Incredible oversight not to have started a mini Thorium reactor project LONG ago. Power will soon become a limiting factor, not the weapon itself.

            In fact, this idiocy ranks right up at the top of the list given the world’s energy needs. Imagine however what would have happened if Telsa’s dream was used.

          • bbb

            If you hooked up an Abram’s turbine straight to a generator and drove the wheels with electric motors, I would think you’d have enough juice to drive at least a megajoule-class mass accelerator. Seeing as how one megajoule is the power of one car doing 100 MPH, and the Abrams has about 5-10 times the horsepower required to do that.

            I think it’s safe to say that MBT’s inside the next 50 years will have railguns.

    • Bill

      Then it won’t be as versatile and powerful as the Rheinmetall 120mm

  • juan234

    Can a DDG-51 even power this thing? Wasn’t the DDG-1000 gonna replace the DDG-51 because the DDG-1000 would have the spare power for lasers and railguns?

  • Jeff M

    Alright lets see what this thing can do to an outboard engine, put it side by side with the laser weapon…

  • Zach MB

    Not really that impressive compared to current KE weapons. The M829A2 Penetrator fired from the M1 does 1680m/s, or the General Dynamics KEW-A1 (APFSDS-T), does 1740m/s.

    Except for the increased ammo capacity, and safety, rail guns don’t make much sense as they stand now. Shrink the system, and double the KE, and maybe it makes it justifiable.

    • STemplar

      Those of course are deployed munitions in existing weapon systems. I’m sure they work considerably better than their pre-cursor experimental prototypes did as well.

    • halcyon

      If they could just double the rate of fire of current systems with no other changes that would be quite an improvement. Top that off with some kind of self-guided projectile and it would be a pretty big step even if there was no gain in KE.

    • blight

      No sabot today has a range of 7km…?

    • citanon

      Yes, but this sabot looks like it has more than 2x the mass of a tank sabot round.

    • PSU

      you do know that mach 5 is the slow testing speed for rail guns, if you have enough power this can go up to mach 10 and in the future even mach 20 , the difference between this and a normal weapon is that if you put more power into it the faster it will go , this is the limiting factor of this for now our power generation at the momment we just cant produce the electricity effectively enough to make it practical but give it 10-20 year when fusion generators start going commercial then this will blow conventional weapons away from use.

  • Tim

    Beautiful! Would be great if they could make it fire like a machine gun: Multiple rounds at a time on targets that move at high speed at least 70 km downrange.

  • Hale

    By the end of the decade they might have a prototype that they can aim and fire for effect accurately, but I doubt that they’ll have anything mount it on at that point, the power consumption is just enormous and they really need to shrink those capacitors down to size.

  • Prodozul

    I have a question about the ammunition. When the projectile hits its inteded target does it explode or just go through it?

  • Blight

    hypersonic artillery might compete with rockets for range in ground combat…

  • Blorch Headblownov

    Even if you can ignore the power issues, good luck on keeping it combat ready. The electrical and structural launch components are going to oxidize and lose all ductility after a few cycles.

  • STemplar

    How about one of these and a defensive laser with some kind of retractable/shroud, on a nuclear sub? Plenty of electricity and how fun would it be to surface 100 miles off a coast, fire off a few minutes of hypersonic rounds at a target area? Incoming anti-ship missiles? Blast em with the laser or just submerge? Hmmmm, decisions decisions……

  • Dan M

    Rate of Fire?

  • blight

    In principle, what the interim future may bring about is a launch system coupled to a gliding mechanism: which means larger rounds that would be capable of performing glide missions. Fire the round at high trajectory, deploy wings, glide and guide to target, versus simply opting for ballistic trajectories.

    However, using 5″ guns for these kinds of things wouldn’t work out…

    • Maxtrue

      You would be surprised how small they will be able to make self-guided objects. Such mechanism however, must withstand the G-force. Not impossible in time.

    • Guest

      Do a Google search on ArcLight Navy, Darpa is looking at a way to boost a hypersonic glider with a 100+ lb payload using the SM-3/VLS system thereby giving anything with VLS tubes a global strike capability with ranges in excess of 2200nm.

  • Dfens

    “We were launching hypersonic bricks at Mach 5, Mach 6″

    Mexican food does that to me too.

  • Ringo

    Scaled up has anyone thought about pointing it straight up and putting things in to space? Maybe the g-force would scrap that idea?

  • SJE

    There are technical difficulties in making the projectile anything other than a dumb round. The EM pulse running through the gun would play havoc with electronics and maybe a problem with explosives.

    Of course, if you have a 5kg round doing Mach 6, the KE is going to obliterate pretty much anything it hits.

  • blight

    EMP’s efficacy drops when electronics are offline. They need only be active after the launching stage, after all.

    • SJE

      True, but sufficiently strong EMPs can fry even when offline, and the projectile is in the middle of the EMP wave. Also, how do you trigger it to activate after launch?

  • coolhand77

    Too bad they got rid of the nuclear powered Cruisers. Those would be a perfect test platform for this puppy. Plenty of power.

  • SJE

    Subs already launch tomahawks, which are conceptually similar to a UAV just with a warhead.

  • foo

    This brightcove crap doesn’t work. Grow up and put it on youtube.

  • Max

    Not trying to belittle the weapon, but 1/8″ of steel isn’t much. I’ve no doubt it is powerful, but they might have used 1″ or more as a more worthy obstacle.

  • mkf

    What video? I can’t see crap, even after enabling all javascript. Win7 x64, Firefox Nightly x86…

  • Bill in Tennessee

    Looking for a platform to mount it on, eh? How about my RAV-4? I’ll drive to your proving grounds this weekend.

  • They’ve had this for years. It’s old news. When they say we’ll have it in 10 years that’s saying we’ll tell you “we’ve already had it for years” in ten year. I’ve seen one made in someones back yard that will fire ball bearing fast enough to light a hay bail on fire. He use a labtop to turn magnits on one after another pulling the balls. Not the same way a tipical rail gun works but neat just the same. You just drop a hand full of bearing in and rata tat tat great balls of fire! If he can, DARPA can.

  • Billy

    Better start installing solar panels then.

  • RunningBear

    32 MJ (sufficient to support a 110 nmi mission) with muzzle velocities of 2.5 km/sec.

  • Guest

    Looks like the Stars Wars battle cruiser main guns….

    Going further….

    If made big enough, could be use against doomsday meteors…

    If made small enough, will replace handguns, rifles.. hypersonic bullets can punch through anything… snipers can shoot from 10 miles away with shock fronts clearing away the wind (calculations) and aims straight as laser. If smaller still – laser bullets maybe? Power to push then power to pull also- powerful lasers made to shape – light saber? A handgun that could take out a tank? Where there’s offense, there’s defense – would use the push away force around an object to protect against incoming threats – force fields…metal and non-metal rounds to counter….

    The start of anti-gravity – this tech small and controlled and maybe with maglev tech – no tyres needed – bad news for tyre companies

    Star Wars tech for real…

  • Donzi’s sort of thought? So it is deeper, isn’t it? I don’t boat gear
    know, yes. In the Kibbutzim in order to offer. You can certainly change your lifestyle and bring change
    that needs our help Chief. And all that dust swirling around the water, boat gear and he also was completely insane.