Home » Air » Air Force » USAF Wants New CSAR Birds in Service By 2017

USAF Wants New CSAR Birds in Service By 2017

by John Reed on May 26, 2011

New details are emerging with the Air Force’s plan to replace its fleet of heavily used HH-60G Pave Hawk Combat Search and Rescue helicopters; namely, the service now hopes to award a contract in late fiscal year 2013 with the aircraft being ready to fly missions by FY-17 or early FY-18, according to service briefing document.

This signals a delay of a little over two years when compared to a request for information posted on FedBizOpps early last year that stated a mission ready or, Initial Operational Capability, date of no later than Sept. 30 2015.

Over the last ten years of war in Iraq and Afghanistan the Pave Hawks have become some of the most heavily used choppers in the Pentagon’s inventory. The rescue birds are the only aircraft in DoD dedicated to performing extremely high-risk rescue missions; whether into a hot LZ or in bad weather, the Pave Hawks and their highly-trained crews of pilots and PJs will come when called. Needless to say, this has taken its toll. Right now, the Air Force is down to about 99 HH-60s from an authorized total of 112 due to combat losses and accidents.

The service has initiated a band aid program to replace the 13 lost aircraft in the next couple of years with UH-60M airframes purchased from the Army. Still, this does little to address the fact that the vast majority of the CSAR fleet is aging and overused, with dozens of airframes developing stress cracks.

Now, more than two years after the cancellation of the $15 billion CSAR-X effort, the service is inching toward a less-technologically ambitious round of competition to replace the birds, with a draft request for proposals ‘notionally’ scheduled for early FY-12 and a final RfP out later that year followed by the FY-13 contract award, according to an Air Force briefing slide on its chopper purchasing strategy titled, Air Force Helicopter Acquisition Update.

This would be followed up by a little more than four years of development and test work using two test aircraft wrapping up in early FY-17. Meanwhile the first four choppers in the batch of 38 Low-Rate Initial Production aircraft will start to be delivered in FY-16. Six more will be added in FY-17, ten in FY-18, 18 in FY-19 and another 18 in FY-20 as the program shifts into full production. However, this schedule is only “notional” according to the document and relies on the service receiving at least $11 million in R&D cash in FY-12 to create an RfP and all the other tasks associated with starting a new procurement effort, according to the document.

 

Share |

{ 9 comments… read them below or add one }

Guest May 26, 2011 at 1:34 pm

The H-71 platform would have been good, had everyone involved with it didn't screwed the pooch trying to get them over here.

Reply

jamesb May 26, 2011 at 2:15 pm

Wait?…..

Is it April Fools Day again?

Ther is no way an American Manufactur is gonna bring this order in on time and underbudget by 2017 ….SIX years from now…..

No way…

Why did you guys even do a post on this?

Reply

jamesb May 26, 2011 at 2:19 pm

The outgoing Sec of Defense admitted the other day that in the last ten years the US has NOT been getting a good bag for its buck…..

Listen the only Helo that came in on time was the Army Lakota….
A foreign jobbie…
Since we know after the Marine One cluster f*#k the contract ain't going anyone but Boeing or Sikorsky we know the deal WILL be over cost and late…..

Reply

xbradtc May 27, 2011 at 10:35 am

The VH-71 program WAS terribly run, but don't blame the contractor. The customer, both the Navy and the White House, kept adding bells and whistles to the program LONG after the design was "finalized."

Does the Presidential helicopter really need a galley and secure VTC? When's the last time the President was on a flight more than 20 minutes? He can't do just a voice call?

Reply

jamesb May 26, 2011 at 2:20 pm

History people…History…..

Reply

anon May 27, 2011 at 8:48 am

http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/gao-re-csarx-

If this is right, they did hold a competition but it was re-competed? Perplexing.

Reply

MCVet May 27, 2011 at 11:39 am

Major effort should be towards the X-2/X-3 technology, not re-inventing the wheel!

Reply

James May 28, 2011 at 1:09 am

What about a CSAR varient of th Osprey. I seam to recall something about the reason the Air Force bought into the program was to use a) help drive down the price per unit costs and b) for use as special operations, unconventional warefare aircraft. What happened to that plan?

Reply

Paveslave May 18, 2012 at 12:36 am

osprey is a POS

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: