F-35B: “Running When We Intended to Crawl”

As you know, the Marine Corps’ F-35B Joint Strike Fighter has been conducting short take-offs and vertical landings aboard the amphibious assault ship USS Wasp for a few weeks now.  Just yesterday, the F-35 program invited a host of reporters to watch the jet conduct operations from the Wasp.

The B-model, once beset with cost overruns and testing delays, is now “running when we in tended to crawl,” naval F-35 test director Marine Col. Roger Cordell told reporters aboard the Wasp.

As of yesterday, the B had performed 60 of the 67 test flights it is slated to fly off the Wasp. Testing will end on Thursday.

Here’s an interesting write up in Defense News on how the jet compares to the Marines’ F/A-18 Hornets:

The aircraft has flown very well during the sea trials, said Marine Lt. Col. Matt Kelly, lead F-35 test pilot at Naval Air Station (NAS) Patuxent River, Md. While he couldn’t compare the jet directly to the Harrier since he was an F/A-18 Hornet pilot, Kelly pointed out that the sea trials are his first experience operating from an amphibious assault ship, which is a testimony to the F-35B’s excellent handling characteristics.

“I have found this airplane to be just a really nice airplane to fly in the shipboard environment,” he said. “Prior to two weeks ago I had never landed or taken-off from this type of ship… It’s a pleasure to fly.”

Kelly added that the F-35B is easier to handle on the flight deck than he had imagined it would be. The challenge is not landing the aircraft but rather “putting the nose tire in a 1-foot-by-1-foot square box,” he said.

In up and away flight, the F-35 handles magnificently, similar to a clean F/A-18 Hornet with more power, Kelly said.

Remember, the troubled B-model was put on a two year probation by former Defense Secretary Robert Gates and last week Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey said the DoD might not be able to buy all three variants of the jet. Needless to say, these successful sea trials are a much needed PR coup for the Marines’ future fighter.

20 Comments on "F-35B: “Running When We Intended to Crawl”"

  1. Wow. It can take off and land on a boat. Whoppee. I hardly call it a major accomplishment that the over budget /behind schedule airplane can take off and land on a ship. If this is a big gold star for the program then we are setting the bar pretty low for $383 billion in America anymore. How about can it do that on time, on cost and to the specs that were promised? I think that's pretty much the real issue with the damn planes, not that they can fly.

  2. I'm curious as to future test flights: fully loaded, dirty configuration, etc. I'm sure these test flights were with the stripped down version. Perhaps someone more informed could fill us in here.

  3. Let's also try to remember in the face of all this "good news," that the F-35B was originally intended to reach IOC last year, not just starting test hops off an LHD. Merely getting a functional airplane out the back end of the program was not the goal. If it's not affordable in numbers to achieve the defense policy of this country, this program is a failure.

  4. This program has been "crawling" long enough, Its time to stretch her legs.

  5. I'm curious if the F-35B is being rushed through the test phase. It's telling that this news about it doing so well now is released at a time when most people are seriously considering cancelling the B-model and one of the other models in favor of another alternative like the F-22 or upgraded Super Hornet models.

  6. I wonder if the lesson we should take from this is "a defence program won't start moving its ass and meeting targets unless it is under genuine threat of cancellation". Greeeeeeat. Can you a manager boasting about how his new employee meets every target each time (and only when) he gets a conditional notice of termination?

  7. Personally, I'm more curious as to why they have an F-18 pilot doing the flight testing. I mean I can understand it at a later point, but you would think that for the initial round of testing for something like this they would want someone experienced with aircraft of similar capability/in this setting.

    Whenever I see something like this, it raises questions in my head as to how valid the story is and whether or not its a pr stunt. To me it smacks of an officer saying, "Well, our Harrier guys are all saying that the plane is inadequate, not ready for the fleet, is a bigger lawn dart than the Harrier is, etc. But this Hornet guy who has never flown a Harrier before and has no experience with VTOL thinks its the coolest thing ever, so lets have him give an interview!"

  8. Typical. The F-35B performed better in these tests than expected and the critics are still screaming it should be cancelled.

    They say is lacks agility but a test pilot confirmed it handled like a clean F/A-18. They say it will melt the deck and deafen the crew but it hasn't done that in 60 flights. It's already proven easier to land and handle than the AV-8.

    But nope, despite all of this it's still a death trap that will cost $300 million an aircraft and burst into flames if it gets a mean look. You guys sound the same as the critics of the Abrams, Bradley, Stryker, F-14, F-15, F-22, and just about every major procurement program in the last 30 years.

  9. the F-35(B) will be an amazing aircraft. it'll have its growing pains like any other aircraft, a bit more so concidering the complexity of the system and what I am guessing is an overreach between reality and desirability

    but even so, the F-35 will still be a enormous failure, because of its cost. while acceptable in mild economic times, this will be the death of all variants when the US and its allies come to face the full realities of the economic crisis around the corner. already all services have accepted that there will be budget costs, but as history teaches us, these are always bigger than first asumed

    add to that the fact that technology evolves exponentially rather than lineair, meaning that the F-35 will be technologically outdated if it does ever become operational. already the newest AESA radars are capable of detecting stealth aircraft at long range, what chance will the F-35 have 10 years from now?

    and so it is that the F-35 will be the (disastrous) end of its kind, as unmanned systems take over more and more of its roles…

  10. This reminds me of the AMRAAM program; long, painful gestation, but when it's time comes, it does what they said it would at the beginning….

  11. I thought the B version has been canceled?

  12. The F35 nay-sayers are missing the point….

    Given a relatively benign "enemy no 1" like our Chinese friends the important thing is that we know how to make a few F35s and F22s.

    Now, lets build a few and move onto the next thing and while we're at it order a few thousand COIN turboprops and drones to solve the real world's problems : Somali pirates, Islamist fascists and Mexican drug lords.

    The Chinese and the Russians aren't a threat to anyone for the next 10 years at least, probably never.

  13. Nice AC, Pilot sounds like drumming the corporate line because he was told to. Keep spending the money the US is already in debt with and not capable of paying back. But man what a nice shiney AC. Only a matter of time we end up in the same boat with the Greeks and no one to bail us out.

  14. Get a Harrier pilot with combat experience then will talk. For now I remain a skeptic.

  15. The F-35B Lightning II is proving that it is a capable fighter jet as it has avionic software which allows the F-35B to hover or land vertical without as much pilot input as the usage of a F-18 pilot for the test flight of the F-35B was possibly to demonstrate how easy the vertical landing can be accomplished without Harrier experience.

  16. The F-35B has always been the driving design behind the program.When this started the Air Force and Navy didn't want the F35 as much as it was the Marine's baby,,, so I'm just glad at least they'll be fully satisfied. On the other hand now that its working, I bet the Government starts talking about canceling it; its what they always do… as idiotic as that could be.

  17. Now these tests being done,
    are they being conducted with simulated practical warloads (with both the internal bays and external hardpoints tested under ship conditions),
    or is it just a mostly-empty aircraft with nothing more than test instrumentation and no weight of anything simulating any munitions?

  18. I wonder what life would have been like in WW 2 if the Internet was around?? People bashing the P-51A and it's Allison engine. People saying buy more P-40's, Others bashing Monoplanes & metal surfaces. Debates on Autogyros……. Only a Navy test pilot can judge Navy plane posts?

  19. If you’re one of the people that simply wants more fans to increase you rank or your star status, or you simply are trying to
    promote you business, you have to stop and think: If the accounts provided to me from the “get more followers” website(s) are
    inactive, how will that increase my rank or help my business flourish if there’s really
    no one behind these accounts that can help spread the word on what I do, or give me more business in
    the first place. There are many internet sites
    out there over the web which include XXXX.
    Instagram has millions of users who are doing exactly the same thing and you need to
    have an advantage over them.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*