Home » Air » Why is Japan Suddenly Freaked Out by the Osprey? (Updated)

Why is Japan Suddenly Freaked Out by the Osprey? (Updated)

by Ward Carroll on July 2, 2012

As reported by our sister blog DoD Buzz, last week the Japanese government balked at USMC basing a squadron of V-22s in Okinawa — a development that certainly surprised the Marine Corps (and DoD) and demonstrated that, for all of its flight hours across the globe, the airplane’s bad reputation still lingers.

Or does it?

Some defense industry insiders claim that the hubub around V-22 basing in and around Japan has little to do with concerns about aircraft safety and a lot to do with the politics of Okinawa versus the Japanese mainland.  “You have one percent of the population hosting 74 percent of the country’s military capability,” said one defense official.  Apparently the governor of Okinawa is looking for any reason to make an issue out of U.S. military basing in his region — and the V-22 gave him a couple of reasons in recent months. 

An MV-22 crashed April 22 near Agadir, Morocco while participating in Exercise African Lion, and a CV-22 Osprey crashed June 13 during a training mission north of Navarre, Fla., injuring five crew members.

While the mishap investigations are not final, DoD has allowed that the Marine Corps crash was not caused by a mechanical failure, which could be code for “pilot error”  or another factor like weather or a bird strike, etc.  That is ironically good news in the case of foreign government concerns in that it says that the airplane isn’t inherently dangerous.

 The Osprey’s checkered test history lives in defense procurement and military aviation infamy, no doubt.  But the Marine Corps is quick to point out that — in spite of its extensive time in test and development — the V-22 is still relatively young from an operational point of view.  (The Corps just surpassed 115,000 flight hours on the MV-22B variant and SOCOM (AFSOC) has flown 25,000 flight hours.)  The Osprey has done a number of high-profile ops, including the rescue of a downed aviator in Libya last year.

At this writing the first squadron of WESTPAC-based Ospreys are headed for Japan aboard a commercial ship.  Once they arrive they’ll fly a couple of post-transit check hops out of MCAS Iwakuni — and that’s it.  At that point they’ll sit and wait for the results of both mishap investigations to be finalized and presented to the Japanese government, which should happen around late July.  The ultimate plan is to have both USMC and SOCOM Ospreys forward-deployed out of Futenma Air Base in Okinawa.

Some airplanes outgrow their bad reputations.  (The Tomcat comes to mind.)  Others never do.  (The Harrier comes to mind.)  What camp will the Osprey ultimately fall into?

Breaking news:  Okinawa’s governor rejects the plan.

Share |

{ 90 comments… read them below or add one }

@Earlydawn July 2, 2012 at 3:33 pm

What was the Tomcat's bad rap? The compressor stalls?


Sir Sapo July 2, 2012 at 7:05 pm

Violent compressor stalls that resulted in more than a few aircraft losses. The TF-30 wasn’t the greatest fighter engine in the world which left the Tomcat pretty underpowered until the B and D upgrades.


krypton November 13, 2012 at 10:46 am

Worse than that, the plane was becoming a publicity problem (large two-man crew deaths often are), which is why they dragged in your obedient Scientologist to do a recruiting film about it.

The A-4 was really hot. So was Kelly McGillis.


Ward July 2, 2012 at 5:03 pm

Yeah . . . that and high AOA performance.


Dfens July 2, 2012 at 6:17 pm

What could possibly have gone wrong? We told them it was the pilots who sucked and not the aircraft, but still they don't want our "worthless" pilots flying that aircraft in their airspace. Yeah, who would have possibly seen that result coming? Idiots.


Hunter76 July 2, 2012 at 7:47 pm

Yeah, the rapes are hard to forgive. The military should have the right to yield some cases to local jurisprudence.


UAVgeek July 3, 2012 at 6:26 pm

In the case of Okinawa and Japan, the SOFA agreement means that any crimes committed locally are handled by the Japanese justice system, which if charges are brought, a conviction is almost a foregone conclusion. Know the rules before you play on the turf.


Lance July 2, 2012 at 8:46 pm

The V-22 is NOT a real advantage compared to helicopters or fixed wing transports via C-130. Overall most defense experts wanted to abandon the V-22 but politics saved this POJ. Overall newer choppers like some newer CH-53 would be far better to base in crowded Japan than this plan which has and will always have crash issues.


Thomas L. Nielsen July 3, 2012 at 2:30 am

"….most defense experts …."

These being who? And please also provide evidence that these "who"'s constitute "most defense experts".

Regards & all,

Thomas L. Nielsen


tiger July 3, 2012 at 10:29 am

Sorry, but Thumbs down on that one. Choppers are not any safer and aerodynamicaly limited in speed and other factors.


Vulpine July 3, 2012 at 10:46 am

Unlike some, I believe the V-22 has some serious advantages by having the longer legs of a fixed-wing bird with the VTOL of a helicopter. It is a supplementary bird that has the ability to go farther, faster than a helicopter yet still land in a space not much different from a CH-47. However, as it is a hybrid of both aircraft types, this does mean flying it is more complicated.

Now, if we ever start using quad-rotor craft we might see a whole new paradigm.


Lance July 3, 2012 at 4:06 pm

Not really the extra speed is done at higher altitudes which makes it still too slow for fixed wing planes and the fact the design is aerodynamically unsound makes it a hazard for crew and passengers.


Vulpine July 3, 2012 at 4:53 pm

"Higher altitudes"? Like 2,000 feet? Usually the V-22 shifts to fixed-wing mode immediately after take-off and remains in that mode until preparing to land. The aerodynamics also aren't any more unsound than any other cargo aircraft with the exception that the 'propellors' are much larger and turn at a slightly slower rate than, say the C-130's props. I would really like to see supporting evidence for both of your statements here.

I might note that so far every crash of the V-22 has been at low altitude and usually during either take-off or landing. That alone eliminates your argument about its speed and aerodynamics since neither one has any effect in those conditions.


krypton November 13, 2012 at 11:00 am

Yes, all of that, and add capabilities normal helos lack, and on-board armament better than one M60, And the capability to get a lot of marines on the ground quickly without a para drop into a hot county.

But then you have to throw in pilots without enough training, and a set of aerodynamics which should be a warning to all its pilots, and a simulator which really doesn't work as well as the M$ turkey Simulator. Granted that pilots should not have to work real hard for transition, but they should still have to work: the plane is not a toy.

In any case, the Osprey deal is just another easy reason we're giving the Japanese to kick us out. Do what they ask and you won't have to do what they really want us to do- buy their toys, sell them our technology, but don't leave standing foreign troops on holy soil.

jamesb July 2, 2012 at 9:48 pm

Marine One fleet duties?


WILd January 11, 2013 at 1:17 pm

They surely wouldn't trust it to fly the POTUS around.


majr0d July 3, 2012 at 3:55 am

The Japanese don't like Ospreys? No problem, they didn't like nukes either.

We aren't flying the local nationals around in the Osprey.


tiger July 3, 2012 at 10:31 am

You however don't live next to the place.


majr0d July 3, 2012 at 1:22 pm

I have a house near the new tank range at Benning. The house shakes at times with the concussion of gunnery, Machinegune fire, and explosions are nearly a daily event. Ive lived outside Eglin where the sound of F15s woke me every morning. As the saying goes, it's the sound of freedom.


William C. July 4, 2012 at 5:39 am

I miss the days when A-10s regularly flew over my house.


Robert Fritts July 8, 2012 at 5:51 pm

Here in Tucson we weren't in contention for the F-35 training site because the city was supporting the A-10 noise protestors. I think the only modern plane quieter than a A-10 was the S-3 Viking, The Viking sounded like a weak Hoover.

Vulpine July 9, 2012 at 9:37 am

Just goes to show some people don’t know what they’re talking about, doesn’t it, William?

Mike July 3, 2012 at 8:45 am

Unfortunately, most very young Marines are loaded with testosterone, and when they drink, they can and do make asses of themselves. Not that all branches have this problem, but the Marines have a larger segment of chest thumpers than the other branches.


UAVgeek July 3, 2012 at 6:28 pm

Which means the administrative assbeatings and controls need to be just that much harsher. Of course going to jail in Japan ain't a joke. In a lot of places not much has changed since the Kempeitai was in charge.


Robert Fritts July 8, 2012 at 6:19 pm

As your dealing with 18-26 year old Man/Boys you always have some problems, especially alcohol related, branch of service is not the determining factor. In Okinawa the very light punishment metered out by the USMC for all UCMJ actions became and is a big issue on the island. As anti-Marine sentiment on the island rose, it appears that the USMC intentionally began giving out lighter and lighter punishments to thumb their noses at the public and especially the newspapers. It is time to leave Okinawa period.


krypton November 13, 2012 at 11:10 am

I feel the same way about Biloxi… and San Antonio… and Dover… And Anchorage… and Duluth… Hell, there are civilians who feel that way about Parris Island. Most military bases seem to be right around the corner from earth's enema aperture.

They never seem to put bases in places like La Jolla. They shut the one in Monterey (probably so they could reclaim the golf course on Fort Ord).


tiger July 9, 2012 at 12:43 pm

Marines are not the only holder of such qualities. Try living in some college towns? Same age group, same behavior.


blight_ August 3, 2012 at 4:49 pm

Well sure. Being 17-25 is somehow supposed to make it natural, whereas what happens afterwards depends on the SOFA.


Chiketah July 3, 2012 at 9:58 am

The Chinese don’t want us in Japan because the V-22 can launch combat loaded Marines straight from Okinawa, drop them in an LZ in China, and return to base or a friendly country for fuel. China pays the protesters to sit outside all day, they make the news, Okinawans see the news, raise questions, osprey crashes, Osprey “unsafe”, diplomatic nightmare, China wins. Except they don’t because the Ospreys are going whether they like it or not.


tiger July 3, 2012 at 10:35 am

What in the Wide, wide, world of sports?? What is a plane load of Marines going to do in a Nation of a Billion & a half people???? Even Sterling Archer & ISIS would have a better plan than that one.


UAVgeek July 3, 2012 at 6:30 pm

You'd be surprised how much damage a small team of Force Recon Marines can do if not detected right away. But most of it would be recon for heavier assets. You don't think the exact, gps location of the homes of the people manning the local SAM battery would be a nice thing to have?


champy July 4, 2012 at 11:12 am

What idiot would land a few Marines in China. They'd be dead within hours. China is not Iraq.


Riceball July 5, 2012 at 4:30 pm

Maybe not hours but I agree with the general sentiment and this is coming from a former Marine too. A small handful of Marines landing in China would definitely have a hard time of it, China is far more populous than most Middle Eastern nations and a lot that population is pretty coastal and I'm not sure that you could successfully fly an Osprey that far inland without being detected.

UAVgeek, the locations of where SAM battery crews would be somewhat useful but not really the sort of thing that Marine Recon does, that's more of a CIA type of thing. Besides, I'd imagine that the vast majority of Chinese SAM crews live on base with mostly on the officers living off base, remember, China's military (to the best of my knowledge) is still largely conscript based and I don't think that conscripts are typically off base housing. The sort of thing that Marine Recon would be concerned with are the locations of the SAM batteries themselves along with anything capable of hitting amphibs.

blight_ July 7, 2012 at 11:48 am

I learned in Halo that a small force of Marines can change the fate of the universe.


Robert Fritts July 8, 2012 at 6:26 pm

Thats right and when the PRA is bearing down on you and there is no where to go? You can always hit reset and start a new game. This is as silly as real Marine officers at Anapolis quoting Col. Nathan Jessup in debates, a fictional movie character. God save the Marine Corps from themselves.


meatpopsicle July 3, 2012 at 12:18 pm

Last time I checked we won the war. Tough shit japan.


JackBlack July 3, 2012 at 2:46 pm

Eat crap, so by your terms you invade and conquer a sovereign country, right, middle ages much? Why did we lose Nam, and Korea and Columbia and…


krypton November 13, 2012 at 11:17 am

The marines learned in the South Pacific that a lot of Marines could get killed by a bunch of lunatics with granades, and usable rifles, wearing loincloths.


tiger July 9, 2012 at 12:40 pm

Please come into the year 2012?


DrSique May 7, 2013 at 11:58 am

Not to mention, meat, that we supply and fund most of the defense for the effin ingrates. Perhaps a few boatloads of nuclear tipped tomahawks would be easier for them to swallow.


Pappa51 July 3, 2012 at 2:08 pm

I have always thought that we should leave Japan, Germany, Korea, etc to stand up for themselves. They complain and moon over some incident then if we leave there economy goes to pot. I say save the money and the man power, bring our guys home, let the locals protect themselves and stop living on our dime.


guest July 3, 2012 at 8:03 pm

Yup. Those countries will still be there the next time we have to fight our way clear across the world to get to them again.


Thomas L. Nielsen July 4, 2012 at 1:55 pm

"….then if we leave there economy goes to pot. I say save the money and the man power, bring our guys home, let the locals protect themselves and stop living on our dime."

So the economies of Germany and Japan would collapse if the US pulled its forces (such as they are) home? And the Germans and the Japanese are "living on your (US) dime"? Seriously?

And "They complain and moon over some incident…."? Of course they complain when someone commits a crime (which is what we're talking about – not "some incident"). Just like someone in the US would certainly complain if I were to commit a crime in, say, Washington DC.

Regards & all,

Thomas L. Nielsen


Robert Fritts July 9, 2012 at 2:07 pm

I visited my son last year at the US Army Garrison BeneLux. Went to dinner with the garrison CO and local officials. The CO asked the local Mayors what they would do if the installation closed and the NATO HQ left. One replied that they already have it planned out, then drew a quick sketch of a Regional Occupational Learning Center complete with trade schools, University distant learning center, sports center and medical facilities(all of these would be new) on a napkin.
Many countries have been great hosts to the US military, and generaly US Force have been great guests. But if you think they are existing off of American Welfare you are ignorant.


FH001 December 25, 2012 at 3:29 pm

I'm a Japanese.
Regarding the money for USFJ, we pay it all ourselves from 1970's. http://www.mod.go.jp/j/approach/zaibeigun/us_keih

Besides that, I thank them because our defense force and our government's diplomatic skill has been too poor. And I'm also worrying about Okinawa's economy without USFJ or any other armed force to deploy there. That freaking out is not our national movement. Actually I heard people saying that it is partial fever. Mainly these people do not live in Okinawa. Neither do I.

It contains our domestic gap between Okinawa and other areas from the wartime. Okinawa is an only area where people experience land battle. And they reverted to Japan 1972, 27years after the WW2 ended.


Mitch S. July 3, 2012 at 2:32 pm

Had a brief visit to Okinawa about ten years ago.
Found that officially they were pissed at the Americans, but if you spoke to the old timers (at least in Japanese) they'd tell you they remember how badly the Japanese treated them before the battle and they appreciate the way the Americans cared for them.
They also know if it weren't for the military Tokyo would completely ignore them. And if the Japanese took a bigger role the Okinawans would have nobody to complain to if abuses occurred (Mainland Japanese look down on Okinawans as not being "real Japanese").

If the US announced that we agree and in fact will pull all our forces off Oki I wonder how that governor would do in the next election.


UAVgeek July 3, 2012 at 6:31 pm

He'd do really well. Obviously you don't speak enough Japanese to know what they REALLY think.


Mitch S. July 4, 2012 at 1:18 am

I was with a native Japanese. It wasn't the communication that makes my comment a guess, it's the small and narrow sample.
We only spoke with a few old timers (and a middle aged cab driver), and that was over 10 years ago (though Okinawans are long lived) so I'm not arguing with you, but I do believe they were being honest.

I don't know the stats but I'd guess the US bases are a big part of Okinawa's economy. People complain (often justifiably) but tend to quiet down when their livelihood is on the line.(The resorts are seasonal, the sugar cane fields are tough work, guess they can make more habu liqueur! ).

I read somewhere that part of the problem with US forces on Oki was that being posted to Okinawa was seen as a career dead end so senior officers assigned there were not the best and morale/discipline suffered.
Do your observations agree?


UAVgeek July 6, 2012 at 4:11 am

I don't know what goes on at the top, but amongst the baby boomers and younger, American troops are universally looked upon as an unsophisticated loathesome bunch. The exceptions are the few women who are fascinated by anything foreign.


terry July 4, 2012 at 11:15 am

We killed 25% of Okinawans as we liberated them from the Japanese. We turned that beautiful island into a barren rock. No, they didn't like that.


William C. July 4, 2012 at 1:24 pm

Well maybe they should blame the Imperial Japanese government that started the whole mess, that conscripted Okinawan civilians into their forces to die in futile attacks.


JackBlack July 3, 2012 at 2:47 pm

Unfortunately this heli crap is news still and not history.


JBomb July 3, 2012 at 8:37 pm

First off we are not in Japan to protect Japan, we are in Japan to protect our interests in the region. Second, if America pulled out of Japan their military is not strong enough to protect the country by itself and it would take a significant amount of time to build it up to do so. Therefore if that is the direction we want to take, it needs to be a long term plan to allow them to do so without leaving them vulnerable, and that would include changing their laws we implemented at the end of WW2. Thirdly, and I am surprised the governor doesn't realize that if we pulled out of Okinawa the local Okinawa economy would be devastated.


Robert Fritts July 9, 2012 at 1:34 pm

Protect Japan from what? Their Biggest Trading Partners? I'm a old Cold Warrior but the world has changed. Time for Us to come home. Keep our Big stick, but come home.
What if the Chinese dominate East Asia? Duhh! They are the biggest, richest nation in East Asia, they already dominate East Asia, nothing we can do about it.
If we leave the Middle East Iran will dominate the Persian Gulf? Did you hear what your saying. There is a reason its been the PERSIAN Gulf for 6000 years.
What about radicals who want to re-establish the Muslim Calipate? Too late, its Feat Accompli.
Cut the budget and reinforce the USA's borders.


krypton November 13, 2012 at 11:23 am

Left out the part about Iran being the small-size (and not as civilized) version of Ancient Persia, but otherwise, yup.


Ohio Shawn June 14, 2013 at 1:49 pm

They have the worlds 3rd largest modern army, how can they not be ready to take care of themselves?


Roland July 4, 2012 at 6:36 am

Probably it's the size, sound and the falling part…


Sandra July 4, 2012 at 11:20 am

G2mil has a new article about this mess. First, our senators have openly rejected the idea of spending $24 billion to move 4000 Marines to Guam (not 9000 as reported). Half the Marines are leaving Okinawa, Futenma, Kinser and Foster are closing, Kadena is downsizing, and some Marine aircraft will move up to Kadena, which is ten times larger. That is the plan endorsed by Senator Webb, McCain, and Levin. This costs nothing and makes a lot of sense if you read the details.


blight_ July 6, 2012 at 1:42 pm

I saw that post too, but wasn't sure how to start investigating its veracity.


LoSul July 9, 2012 at 3:20 pm

G2mil….a stalwart source of objectivity regarding anything to do with the Osprey….

Come on, do you watch Rachel Maddow to hear a neutral take on Mitt Romney, or listen to Rush Limbaugh to form your opinion of Barak Obama?


Old Navy July 5, 2012 at 9:48 am

Tell them it beats the B29's. As for the Marines, Semper Fi…Let the Japanese go it alone. They will be speaking Chinese in two three generations. A side note I wonder when the Chinese will build a aircraft like the V22. Guess no American/Canadian company has sold them the info/software/code or they, the Chinese, haven't stolen the info on their own.


PrometheusGoneWild July 5, 2012 at 2:47 pm

Philippines here we come!


patriot July 9, 2012 at 4:57 pm

Philippines not really a bad place for American armed forces for basing naval and air forces that Japan has problem with…Phiippines is strategically located that's not only support Japan but the rest of countries in Asia that is allied to USA esp. S Korea.U.S forces in Japan and Korea combine about 1/3rd should be relocated to the PHIL. if possible to give those countries government relief of constant irritants in dealing with there citizens and our expanding military pivot to Asia


blight_ July 27, 2012 at 3:29 pm

Japan is well placed to support Korea. Then again, most bases are on the Pacific side of Japan and not its SCS/Korea-facing side.


krypton November 13, 2012 at 11:40 am

Philippines also no longer under rule of boss Marco and shoeless witch. Philippines actually have real government now. Philippines no more want white boys, no more want Navy Pilots either. Docking military ships cost real bucks now.

Now Filipinos only learn one language- their own. In any case, the volcanoes there are not helping matters (one disabled most aircraft on the islands- nothing like fine pumice spray for engines and plexi windows). Great place to put a bunch of stealth-painted aircraft. Makes 'em real shiny.


SP/4 Chapman July 7, 2012 at 4:18 am

How 'bout we put a end to foreign aid ( internat'l welfare ) and bring our people home and then we can spend that money at home.!


tiger July 9, 2012 at 12:37 pm

It's not 1898 and we live in a Nation that stretches from Guam to The U.S.V.I. We can't sit behind a Great wall of America called the Atlantic & Pacific any more. Home? The job of defense is forward. Not sitting in Ft. Dix polishing Boots. We have bases in Japan to arm, refuel, & resuply from. It's not practical to shiip everything or everyone from state side. That takes time….. Read about the Korean War sometime. It took weeks to get men, planes & supplies to Korea in 1950. In a few weeks most of the nation was over run & our backs to the sea at Pusan.


Andy Hughes August 3, 2012 at 3:18 pm

Japan is one of the richest countries in the world; it doesn't need your pathetic 'aid'.


Mastro July 9, 2012 at 10:42 am

The brass just might to want to pass on any "Osprey flights for Okinawan orphans" PR stunts.

At least until the safety record matches that of the 747 or so.


tiger July 9, 2012 at 12:38 pm

The V-22 has a better record than many other Boeing products. I'll take it over a 737 or Chinnook any day.


Tiger July 27, 2012 at 2:01 pm
atiboy14 September 20, 2012 at 8:20 pm

They are freaked out because the Osprey is a flying coffin and never should have entered service


Lcpl Petersen February 22, 2013 at 2:34 am

Straight up, if you really wanna see the Japanese shit bricks, get all the military personnel stationed on the Japanese islands to order and wear Sea Shepard T-shirts. The fuckers are still whaling in the southern arctic whale preserves…even after an international moratorium was ratified by over a hundred countries.


japanisgay.org April 29, 2013 at 10:14 am

Because japan is gay


BILLE May 15, 2013 at 8:46 am



Thomas L. Nielsen May 15, 2013 at 10:16 am

….and typing in all caps does not make you look smarter, and it does not add validity to your (and I use the term in its loosest possible sense) argument.

Shake your head and try again.

Regards & all,

Thomas L. Nielsen


cheap wiki backlinks gigs June 22, 2013 at 2:58 pm
blight_ July 2, 2012 at 3:56 pm

That and if you constrain the types of squadrons that can be based there, then eventually through attrition the squadrons based there will change aircraft types and be forced to leave, or disband. Pure profit for Okinawa.

I imagine they would be equally displeased if the Japanese military moved in in their place. They probably want their island to be less of a military target for the next war.


Bob G July 3, 2012 at 9:02 am

Before Okinawa went back to Japan, (bad idea) they really did not want us there. Personnally, given the fact that WW2 ended some time ago, I say we find another place to work out of. Guam, Austrailia, or Wake. Far away places but less troublesome for us.


steve July 3, 2012 at 2:24 pm

I would strongly suggest that everyone LOOK closely at where the added INFLUENCE is coming from that allows the local government on Okinawa be the driving force of US military presence there? The major error has already been made by a president of the US that gave the Island back to Japan (not to Okinawa). Then go back to THAT president of the US and find out just WHO advised him to give that Island back to the Japanese, when for decades it was understood to be "occupied" by the Japanese, which have since then repopulated that Island with Japanese and no loner Okinawan, as it was before the Japanese "occupied" the Island!!! The answers may clear up the mud….


Belesari July 2, 2012 at 5:00 pm

Thats part of the problem. If your in a war you dont want those types in a sensative post where their idiocy will hurt or kill someone or a whole group of someones. So you send them to the safer area's.

Add to that when soldiers or sailors get bored bad things can happen. Some ports in the US have banned some ships from leave for that reason. Hell i heard one got banned and kicked out in under 24hrs. God that sounds like a awesome party.


19E10 July 2, 2012 at 5:58 pm

All the reasons stated above are accurate. It was the same way where I was stationed in Germany in the early 80's. The locals were tired of the crap.

After we left, all that money left too. Wonder if they'd prefer to go back to the old days ?


UAVgeek July 2, 2012 at 6:06 pm

Okinawa may be economically depressed compared to the mainland but child-raping junior Marines would not be missed despite the economic loss. Oh and just 'cause it didn't end up in the newspapers doesn't mean it didn't happen.


Andy Hughes August 3, 2012 at 3:13 pm

What do you mean all the money left? Germany is one of the richest countries in the world. American idiot.


tiger July 3, 2012 at 10:17 am

Living next to a busy airbase is not fun. Living next to a busy airbase full of Leathernecks Is worse. NIMBY is not just a US thing.


tiger July 3, 2012 at 10:21 am

Uh, we are moving alot to Guam ( They are not thrilled & they are Americans). Meanwhile we are talking to Vietnam & The PI about using facilites again. THe Navy is planning to home port the LCS in Singapore. All moves in Obama's USN/USMC Pacific focus moves.


Ed A July 3, 2012 at 10:25 am

Agree Guam would love to have us there. They are people who appreciate Americas Military. The boost on their economy will also be welcomed.


tiger July 3, 2012 at 10:25 am

Exactly. The folks in the PI have moved on since we left. The mess of unsuported children still remains another black mark however.


tiger July 3, 2012 at 11:16 am

Love? Rather crowded already with military and land of limits. More like a island version of Nevada.


krypton November 13, 2012 at 10:40 am

Oooh, oooh, teacher, was it maybe the fact that the Japanese have their own Air Force, Army, and Navy, and they constitute our most valuable ally in the whole Pacific, and they are VERY POSSESSIVE about the lands they fought for, even in the distant past? And things like the non-fraternization policy in Japan after WWII didn't help much, but then having our own troops among the Japanese people doesn't seem to have helped at all. Rape is a serious cultural crime in Japan. The added influence was trying to hold on to an ally as long as we could in an area we can't protect, but only transit.


Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: