Home » News » The Defense Biz » Air Force picks KC-46A candidate bases

Air Force picks KC-46A candidate bases

by Mike Hoffman on January 10, 2013

The Air Force announced Wednesday the nine candidate bases slotted to potentially host the KC-46A next generation tanker. The first aircraft are set to arrive in 2016 at active duty units and 2018 at Guard units

From those nine, the Air Force will pick a training unit and two main operating bases — one active duty, the other Guard. Air Force officials said they plan to eventually station the entire planned tanker fleet at 10 main operating bases.

The finalists are as follows:

Active duty main operating base: Altus Air Force Base, Okla.; McConnell Air Force Base, Kansas; Grand Forks Air Force Base, N.D.; Air Force Base, Wash.

Air National Guard main operating base: Forbes Air Guard Station, Kansas; Joint-Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, N.J.; Pease Air Guard Station, N.H.; Pittsburgh International Airport Air Guard Station, Pa.; Rickenbacker Air Guard Station, Ohio.

The Air Force will choose between Altus and McConnell to decide where it will station its formal training unit for the KC-46A. It will be at one of those two bases where pilots will first learn to fly the next generation tanker.

The Air Force currently houses its tanker fleet consisting of the KC-10 and KC-135 at Travis Air Force Base, Calif.; McGuire Air Force Base, N.J.; Altus; Fairchild; Andrews Air Force Base, Md.;  Kadena Air Base, Japan; MacDill Air Force Base, Fla.; March Air Reserve Base, Calif.; McConnell; RAF Mildenhall, England; Seymour Johnson Air Force Base, N.C.. The KC-135 is also stationed at Air National Guard bases in Alabama, Arizona, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Michigan, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Utah, Washington, and Wisconsin.

Share |

{ 70 comments… read them below or add one }

Lance January 10, 2013 at 2:06 pm

Hope they can station some on the west coast like McCord AFB.

Reply

Doug January 10, 2013 at 3:16 pm
tmb2 January 10, 2013 at 3:20 pm

Actually the list in the article says "air force base, wa." Maybe Hoffman left off the name on accident?

Also, just to nitpick the text a little more, they're no longer McChord Air Force Base and McGuire Air Force Base. They're now called Joint Base Lewis-McChord and Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst.

Reply

Doug January 10, 2013 at 5:11 pm
tmb2 January 12, 2013 at 9:31 pm

No worries Doug, we still call it Fort Lewis out of habit sometimes. My remark was made more towards the author than you.

TinkersDam January 11, 2013 at 12:56 pm

You called it. Fairchild is on the list, as it should be. I would expect the initial deployment to reflect the "Pacific Pivot" we've been hearing about, and Fairchild seems like a good candidate.

Reply

sailor12 January 17, 2013 at 12:33 pm

If you look at the list and then look at the guard bases at the bottom of the article looks like there maybe some major base closures coming in the next 3 to 4 years.

Reply

Paul January 10, 2013 at 6:17 pm
stephen russell January 10, 2013 at 8:42 pm

Why no tankers on Ford Island air base?
Pearl Harbor Naval Complex, HI for TransPac missions.

Reply

Tiger January 10, 2013 at 11:44 pm
WILd January 11, 2013 at 12:58 pm

He was right, like another stated it's now called Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam. I know some just shorten to what ever is common for them

Reply

Lance January 11, 2013 at 2:19 pm

I like to see West Coast bases not just Hawaii.

Reply

Adam January 11, 2013 at 1:25 pm

Probably cause there's no runway on Ford Island. I know I live there. Try Hickam AFB across the harbor.

Reply

Jay January 16, 2013 at 8:39 pm

Hee, hee

Reply

deerbandit January 11, 2013 at 1:47 pm

The base chosen for the State of Washington is Fairchild Air Force Base in Spokane. It is the largest tanker base in the United States. Hope this helps.

Reply

john January 16, 2013 at 6:43 pm

McConnell is the largets tanker base.

Reply

That guy January 16, 2013 at 8:05 pm

Fairchild is not the largest, not even close

Reply

SJE January 11, 2013 at 3:41 pm

I understand having WA, and ND, but why OK AND KS. and nothing at the furthest extremities: FL/TX, ME?

Reply

deerbandit January 11, 2013 at 5:07 pm
John January 16, 2013 at 6:50 pm

McConnell is the world's largest tanker base with 63 KC-135's. http://articles.kwch.com/2013-01-09/mcconnell-air

Reply

Pauly January 17, 2013 at 7:44 am

One of those will be the training base, Altus is currently the training base for C-17s. It is centrally located, nice and flat with minimal local air traffic, and the cost of living is very low.

Reply

deerbandit January 11, 2013 at 4:08 pm

The base in Washington State is Fairchild Air Force Base in Spokane. It is the largest refueling base in the Air Force.

Reply

TankerBoom January 16, 2013 at 8:11 pm

Once again no it is not

Reply

Tony R. January 11, 2013 at 6:00 pm

McConnell already has tankers there, and Altus is currently a training base for the heavies so the runways will already have the length and thickness to handle the weight of these aircraft. Same for McConnell

Reply

deerbandit January 11, 2013 at 8:05 pm
Geo January 16, 2013 at 6:28 pm

McConnell does not have tankers anymore, they are an intel base. They lost the tankers they had. Forbes field now has tankers.

Reply

Rino January 16, 2013 at 10:49 pm
Hammer6 January 11, 2013 at 8:22 pm

How will the USAF make final selections?. A few years back, when planning for the (defunct) AFCYBER, the USAF was actively looking for concessions/incentives from states. I hope this practice will not be repeated.

Reply

Vaporhead January 14, 2013 at 9:53 am

The politican with the biggest clout will get the base at his/her home state.

Reply

Tanker Chief January 13, 2013 at 12:22 pm

This article also fails to mention the National Guard operates the KC-135R out of Milwaukee, WI.

Reply

Tanker Chief January 13, 2013 at 12:26 pm

BTW, all the active-duty bases listed as primary bases are former SAC airfields with +13K foot runways and high gross weight reinforced runway/parking surfaces.

13

Reply

Dawson Canfield January 15, 2013 at 8:49 pm

You remember SAC? They were the "other Air Force". Did time at a co8uple of their bases, and they did have the strongest, and sometimes longest runways. Made for fully loaded B-52's.

Reply

Tanker Chief January 13, 2013 at 12:30 pm

Sorry, they've since added Wisconsin for ANG, but still fail to mention the ANG KC-135s in Alaska and Hawaii.

Reply

deerbandit January 13, 2013 at 3:51 pm

Fairchild is also one of the only bases where the ANG and active Air Force share aircraft.

Reply

TankerBoom January 16, 2013 at 8:08 pm

Dude you don't know anything about the taker community, every post you have made has been wrong. Stop talking.

Reply

deerbandit January 16, 2013 at 8:46 pm
Sean Dione January 14, 2013 at 9:57 am

Thay also failed to mention Grissom Air Reserve Base in Indiana, which operates 16 of the Air Force Reserves KC-135Rs, and have done so since the base converted from Active Duty to active Reserve Base in 1994.

Reply

Tony R. January 14, 2013 at 10:15 am

Actually, the tankers have been there longer then that. I was there from 90-92 when it was the largest tanker base. I also remember having to use a five foot rotary hammer bit to drill through concrete to test for fuel in the soil. I think we drilled 2500 holes if I recall right. They used to fly the A model (steam engine I believe they called them?) and the R model. They also had the A-10s there and the occassionally the NECAP bird. I still remember all the alert lights along the NECAP route and the along the Alert route. The Alert facility chow hall used to make the best omelettes :)

Reply

Myron Kocher January 17, 2013 at 10:12 pm
Bryan B January 14, 2013 at 11:09 am

The NJANG unit that flies the KC-135R is also stationed on McGuire AFB. I believe they are the top candidate for the ANG(MOB-2) main base. They have a direct pipeline of JP-8, and all the facilities and resources they are looking for. McConnel and the 108th ARW NJANG will be the picks.

Reply

Larry January 17, 2013 at 2:24 pm
Larry January 17, 2013 at 2:24 pm
Papi1960R January 14, 2013 at 6:24 pm

There is no hurry, Boeing is still has not finalized their specs on the KC-46A yet. It will take years., but will probably be done before the 1st F-35 Wing goes active. It better be the F-35 can't go to McDonalds without a refuel.

Reply

Papi1960R January 14, 2013 at 7:48 pm

Meanwhile Airbus has been busy pumping out its much more capable and significantly less expensive A330 MRTT. The RAF is ahead of schedule, having recieved its 5th much A330 MRTT Voyager aircraft. The French Air Force has recieved their first two A330 MRTT Voyager aircraft and Australia their 3rd A330 MRTT Voyager.
If the original A330 MRTT selection had gone forward the USAF would have 6 Euro built Voyagers, with 6 more to come, before production began in Mobil, Alabama in Summer 2015. But hey, we gave up 22,000 non-union jobs in Alabama to protect 4500 union jobs in Washington.

Reply

Donald ONeill January 16, 2013 at 6:11 pm

The A330 did not fit most tanker units as size and hanger, and being deployed around the world. It was limited with its size and the big factor cost over lifetime compaired to the Boeing. Another is most pilots prefer the Boeing not a aircraft that flys itself AKA computer run sometimes with no input. And last the old KC-135 has done well. No Airbus will last like that old bird. I rest my case with 33years in tankers with four wars deployed with135's

Reply

deerbandit January 16, 2013 at 6:52 pm
Papi1960R January 18, 2013 at 2:15 pm

KC-135 is a great bird and has served well. Its a good thing we did not change infastructure for the C-141, KC-10, C-5, C-17 etc. We always have to make station changes and upgrades with every new aircraft, sometimes every new upgrade.
The most important factor here is that the Reason EVERY airline in the world has rid themselves or are in the process of ridding themselves of the distater that is the Boeing 767. High maintenence costs, labor intensive and low mission availibilty. Only about 18% of all B767s built are flying, most are in storage or scrapped. When I fly North from Davis-Montha, in my Airbus 319, I see 48 B767 sitting at Pinal Air Park storage.

Reply

RCC January 20, 2013 at 9:55 am

Hmm aircraft delivered without working AR systems, unable to meet cargo requirements, and requiring years of MODS to get them to the spec that was paid for, sounds like the right way to go. What Airbus pumps out is a basic A330 and then they mod it with a cargo door and mod with AR system later. They have had 2 AR booms fall of the aircraft, not break off during bad contacts, fall off while in flight.

Reply

Papi1960R January 20, 2013 at 3:18 pm

The two boom failures were 3 years ago. Check the RAAF & RAF pages for current Pics & spec of the final results. I also meant just East DMAFB from Tucson International, not from. I can also see from the that vantage point, the 3 A300s and 2 A330s in storage at DMAFB.

Reply

TBone SeaHawk April 4, 2013 at 12:07 am

3 years ago…Maybe. However, Aussie A330's are still unable to use their booms due to not being able to lower/raise them in-flight due to being too heavy. This was as of a little over a month ago while the KC-767J's, with working booms, were station deployed just next to the Aussie A330 at CNG 2013. Also, the ITaF love their fully functional KC-767A boom, hose & drogue Tankers!

Reply

blight_ January 22, 2013 at 8:59 am

If the UK gets poorer, we'll inherit those A330's like we are inheriting their Harriers. Wee, fun!

Reply

Lorin January 16, 2013 at 8:40 pm

Besides a long thick runway, a ready supply of fuel and large hanger facilities are also prime drivers.

Reply

deerbandit January 16, 2013 at 8:48 pm

Originally built as a repair depot for bombers during World War II, Fairchild has had tankers for more than 50 years. Initially they were stationed along with the B-52 bombers on strategic nuclear alert. When the bombers were moved elsewhere in 1994, Fairchild became the nation’s largest tanker base with both active-duty and Air National Guard wings.

Recently, it became one of the first bases at which active-duty Air Force and Air National Guard units share planes in a partnership arrangement. Taken from the article, if you dont like it tankerboom stop looking.

Reply

@AddisonGast1 January 16, 2013 at 10:46 pm

Fairchild recently completed a 27 million $ makeover which included newest type fuel farm goodies. I think they knew this was in the planning before we did.

Reply

deerbandit January 16, 2013 at 11:07 pm
TankerBoom January 16, 2013 at 10:51 pm

Your sources are wrong, sorry. I on the other hand am speaking from personal knowledge having been at both bases and know their primary missions and capabilities. There is only one supertanker wing and it is in Kansas.

Reply

Em January 17, 2013 at 9:45 am
Moorevette January 17, 2013 at 12:14 am

In the early 80s Grissom AFB was SAC's Largest Air Refueling Wing (305th AREFW). During this time Fairchild was SAC Bomb Wing with two tanker squadrons. After the B-52s left Fairchild, Fairchild may have become the largest AREFW when their designation changed from a Bomb Wing to an Air Refueling Wing. Both Firchild and McConnel are large capable bases.

Reply

Navy Raider January 16, 2013 at 11:25 pm

Self ridge AF base Mich…….. http://www.airnav.com/airport/KMTC Brand new state of the art runways and tower, has had KC-135's for 20 plus years. completed new state of the art Tower 3 years ago, runways 5 years ago, can control…Chicago, Detroit and Cleveland centers…The runway was built for the next generation C-5..Has had not just KC-135's, but C-130's, P-3's, F-15's, A-10's and helo's for the Army and the Marine's C-46 and the Coast guard Sar helo's…

Reply

candor January 17, 2013 at 1:03 pm

During the Viet Nam era Navy and Marine aircraft could not engage in inflight refueling from USAF tankers and USAF aircraft could not do likewise from Navy tankers has this problem been remedied with these new tankers.

Reply

Pedropilot January 19, 2013 at 11:44 pm

As a former KC-135A pilot, I say not true. The KC-135 had to be firred with basket (drogue) and hose, and then could have handled the Navy aircraft's probe.

Reply

Pedropilot January 19, 2013 at 11:45 pm

Sorry, I meant fitted.

Reply

Curt January 22, 2013 at 8:41 am

The KC-10 came standard with a boom and a centerline hose and drogue, so can do both on the same mission. Plus some KC-10s were equipped for wing mounted drogue pods. It appears the KC-46 will be delivered with wing pods but no centerline drogue.

Reply

Peligro January 17, 2013 at 6:07 pm

Start folding up some flags…no wait, we'll give them the obligatory Predator mission.

Reply

Tony R. January 17, 2013 at 6:18 pm

Almost forgot, Grissom probably wouldn't get much consideration anyway due to cost. They have no housing there. When the base was turned over to the Reserve all the housing was giving to the local community. Last time I heard it was being used as low income housing.

Reply

G Ramos January 18, 2013 at 12:47 pm

Why not consider March ARB for the new tankers ,long run way ,18 fuel pits, and plenty of room,and hanger space,

Reply

Boom Town February 12, 2013 at 10:53 pm

Or Travis could easily support them. Size of the aerial port is another important consideration. Fuel pits galore and long, stressed runway.

Reply

The dude February 10, 2013 at 12:58 pm
onlinestoragefree.org May 8, 2013 at 8:26 am
deerbandit January 16, 2013 at 11:03 pm

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: