Is the North Korean Nuke Threat to the US Real?

Today North Korea announced it was conducting a third nuke test in defiance of UN punishment.  While the North Koreans claim they’re simply trying to launch satellites, they also allowed that their ultimate goal was to have the ability to reach out and touch the United States.  Here’s a quote from the government’s official nuke commission (that refers to the nation by it’s official name, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea):

“We do not hide that a variety of satellites and long-range rockets which will be launched by the DPRK one after another and a nuclear test of higher level which will be carried out by it in the upcoming all-out action, a new phase of the anti-U.S. struggle that has lasted century after century, will target against the U.S., the sworn enemy of the Korean people.”

As with all wannabe nuclear powers some of the desire is about actually having the strike capability and some of it is about provoking your enemies.  North Korea is certainly illiciting a “you better not” response from the rest of the world, most vocally the U.S., but are they really moving toward having a viable nuclear weapons arsenal?

AP reports that North Korea is estimated to have stored up enough weaponized plutonium for four to eight bombs, according to scientist Siegfried Hecker, who visited the North’s Nyongbyon nuclear complex in 2010.  But they gooned a rocket launch back in April, which both demonstrated they had a ways to go to realize the dream and embarrassed them to the degree that they seem to be redoubling their efforts.

In any case, the North Korean’s made their motivation clear toward the end of their statement today:

“Settling accounts with the U.S. needs to be done with force, not with words, as it regards jungle law as the rule of its survival.”

Roger that, you Nutty Norks.  Cue the theme music . . .

24 Comments on "Is the North Korean Nuke Threat to the US Real?"

  1. "a new phase of the anti-U.S. struggle that has lasted century after century,"

    Really? I had no idea Thomas Jefferson had a blood feud with the Korean people.

  2. I'm more worried about them selling designs for nuclear reactors and nuclear materials to rogue states. The reactors that the Israel destroyed in Syria via air-strike looked remarkably close to those made by the North Koreans. I don't think the North Koreans have the missiles to use nuclear warheads against us effectively, but selling them to some country with a radical terrorist organization that can use it in some other way that is less conventional could be a problem.

  3. It must be understood that North Korea NEEDs to conduct additional tests in order to validate their designs. Their first test was a failure. The second merely verified a crude device. The North Koreans need to test a miniaturized device (one that can be delivered via missile or plane). Until then, they really don't have a credible nuclear deterrent.

  4. Perhaps we should encourage our allies in the region to develop nuclear weapons for their own defense.

  5. I hope NKorea take action rather threat and trhreat….

  6. Funny how liberal Idiots worry more about a US law abiding citizen owning a semi auto AR than manics in North Korea owing Nuclear weapons and rockets that can hits with said weapons.

    Shows us this nation is done for people who run it too stupid to defend it.

  7. Let's be honest! We have been a country for 238-years and we have been at war for 212 years! Talks cheap!

  8. GreenTeaLeaves | January 24, 2013 at 10:23 pm |

    Time and time again, I am amazed to see how we react to typical political hyperbole, not to mention the demonizing of our "enemies." There is absolutely no way DPRK will launch a nuclear strike against the US – here the D in MAD applies to DPRK, not the US. All that we see in the media is just puffery and posturing by DPRK, probably more for KJE to shown others in DPRK that he's in control and can face up to the only world superpower.

    As mentioned by BlackOwl, I think that proliferation is the more important issue and all this mention in the media about DPRK's supposed ICBM nuclear strike capability is just useless and detracts from the more important and relevant discussion on non-proliferation.

    If your avowed gargantuan enemy offered you some food because you are hungry and, in turn, wants you to give up your prized weapon, would you? Absolutely not.

    There is absolutely no way DPRK will give up their nuclear weapons development or their ballistic missile tech. We gotta get past that and make a deal with them for not spreading their nuclear weapons technology in return for food. THAT is a more realistic option, albeit possibly more difficult to police.

  9. North Korea palys brinkmanship all the time, they are upping the game. They may make a fatal mistake and actually tigger a nuclear exhange.

  10. We have kept these idiots locked up for decades. Their economy is worthless.
    What a great ally China has there…..They must be so proud:)
    Forget going to war. Forget giving nukes to South Korea and Japan.
    This is just another round of saber rattling by a nut-job so they can stay in power while oppressing their people.

  11. Never mind nuking the US, he should shoot his hairdresser first.

  12. Telephone ring: Hello, oh hey Kim, what's up? You need what…….fuel….uh huh…gosh, don't know how to tell ya this but, things are tight over here too. Uh huh, yep, you have a what? Oh good, you play with that and see what it does for you. Try that game with your buds to the north, maybe they'll listen. Hanging up now, thanks for calling….

  13. If they become a threat start distroying their satellittes which could serve as gps for their BMs

  14. I hope their plans blow up in their face.

  15. I do believe there is a threat. They ( North Korea) already anounce it (Although the North Korean statement Thursday said the nuclear tests and rocket launches were "targeted at the United States") and we should begin preparing our defense, precaution and be ready for the inevitable.

  16. No. North Korea is not a real threat. NK is working on an offensive capability to which we already have significant counters already in place. We have satellite and other surveilance that provides warning. We have, what, three? levels of ballistic missile defense tested and some parts active and operational. Even if one got through at this time NK can only hope to toss it in our general direction and hope it hits something good, which would be bad for US, but we are resiliant and will survive. NK wont last 24 hours. Why would they build something they surely know we already have a counter for? I can't be because they *actually* intend to use it. Are they suicidal? No. The nuke is an internal and external political weapon. NK is not a military threat.

  17. Alba Thistleman | March 8, 2013 at 6:59 pm |

    LOL…is this conversation on an intelligent level?? To start with…who the hell NEEDS nukes? Hasn't mankind found enough ways already to kill each other? Nuke Power is the most DANGEROUS, and expensive way to BOIL WATER! So you want 'retards" to play with this?? Really? Why don't we get a band of chimpanzees'''give them each a loaded AK…and turn them loose in the streets! It's tha same thing…The sanctions should be TIGHTER….Hell..AMERICA doesn't even need nuke weapons…but now we've mucked everytrhing up…it can't be undone…so let's do the right thing…make em a "parking lot"..just like Iran and their buddies…

  18. A Southern Canadian | March 8, 2013 at 11:59 pm |

    Dear korea, do not affect southern canada please, otherwise go ahead have fun.

  19. And where are the posts of what the USA is doing, if anything to guard itself against these very real threats?

  20. ALHAJI JIMOH | April 4, 2013 at 11:47 am |


  21. Whatever man | April 5, 2013 at 2:22 am |

    I think the best thing would be to do nothing, sense nothing is going to happen to us and it would save us money to not deploy troops. Besides, If North Korea was capable of wiping us out they wouldn't be threatening us, countries that aren't up to par use fear.

  22. Mr Lance … deaths in US due to firearms – guns, rifles, AR -15 etc kill 23000 people in US every year.. many die due to their husbands upset, settling scores, killing prosecutors etc .. children die from these guns .. Do you ever consider that or you just buy weapons for hunting only?

  23. All I know is it seems that everything is going down the tubes fast economy is gonna crash misile threats are against us and thing are blowing up all over the place hell I cant even make a ham sandwich without seeing how misreable people are

Comments are closed.