Air Force Drone Crashes in New Mexico

Holloman _MQ-1_Predator

The U.S. Air Force hasn’t yet determined what caused an MQ-1B Predator drone to crash yesterday at Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico, a spokeswoman said.

The unmanned aerial vehicle made by General Atomics of San Diego went down at 1:45 p.m. about six miles northwest of the airfield, according to a statement from the base. 

A spokeswoman for the 49th Wing Public Affairs office said the service hasn’t yet concluded whether the accident was caused by an aircraft malfunction or operator error. She said pictures of the destroyed drone or crash site weren’t immediately available. (The office did, however, release a picture of a “similar” drone, posted above.)

The drone was conducting a routine training mission, according to the statement. No one was injured and no private property was damaged in the accident, it stated. A board will be convened to investigate the cause of the crash, it stated.

The aircraft was assigned to the 6th Reconnaissance Squadron, part of the Air Force’s Remotely Piloted Aircraft Formal Training Unit at the 49th Wing, according to the statement.

Eighty-five of the Air Force’s Predators were destroyed in a 16-year period from fiscal 1997 through fiscal 2012, according to statistics on the Air Force Safety Center’s website. That amounts to 6.71 crashes for every 100,000 hours of flying — making the Predator’s lifetime crash rate more than double that of the F-16 fighter jet.

About the Author

Brendan McGarry
Brendan McGarry is the managing editor of He can be reached at Follow him on Twitter at @Brendan_McGarry.

13 Comments on "Air Force Drone Crashes in New Mexico"

  1. "Satellite uplink lost…"

  2. Drug cartel jammer?

  3. Hunters 1
    Air Force 0

  4. Colorado Drone Hunters lol..

  5. Media (Both Left and Right) will call it just another case of Drone PTSD (Here me out. Drone never went overseas or served in Kuwait) instead of the USAF just letting a Drone A-Hole into the ranks in the first place. Every service has.

    P.S. This isn't a problem for just the USAF. And I'm not trying to make light of true PTSD. But I've seen cunts from Qatar try it.

  6. Drones are more prone to crash than manned aircraft because the pilot in a manned aircraft has more at stake. Also loss of comms in a drone means loss of control.

  7. We are just damn lucky it did not fall on illegal immigrants crossing into Nanny land.

  8. It's perfectly normal for US drones to crash on a regular basis. No big deal.

    The F-14s, F-15s, F-16s, F-18s, F-35s, F-22s, B-1b, B-2 … all crash. Why should drones be different?

    I can only hope that all crashes are reported, but I doubt it.

  9. Its just a drone and it was ment to be expandable. It is the first of the modern drones (able to shoot missiles, remote control via satelite from conus) and after all the crash rate is not too bad imho. Theres a learning curve and its successors will get better and better. Even with this crash rate the lost money is just a fraction of the costs for the lost F16s. Or?

  10. A while back i herd of Loaded stinger launchers stolen from a military base probly has nothing to do with this but its just a possibility after all cartels crave weapons like that

  11. They’re not F’n drones. They are remotely piloted vehicles. A Sidewinder, or AMRAAM would be a drone.

  12. I think the 6.71 crash statistic is a bit unfair. If I remember correctly the Predators were rushed into the conflicts before they were fully tested.

  13. what if it can be followed magnetic make it lost no north or south to easy

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.