Home » Air » Grey Eagle Company Joins 160th SOAR

Grey Eagle Company Joins 160th SOAR

by Mike Hoffman on December 12, 2013

Gray EagleThe Army’s elite special operation aviation regiment welcomed its first ever MQ-1C Gray Eagle company last month.

The high end drone is almost an exact replicate of the Air Force’s MQ-1 Predator. It is capable of carrying Hellfire missiles as well as a host of sensor suites to include radars, signal intelligence and high definition cameras.

Adding a Gray Eagle company to 160th SOAR means Army Special Forces units can have an organic MQ-1 aircraft under their control and will lessen the dependence on the Air Force to supply intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR). However, Special Forces will still need to depend on the Air Force as one company will not be able to satisfy all of Army Special Forces’ needs, but it should be especially helpful in training.

The 160th SOAR already has an organic Unmanned Aircraft Systems platoon that consists of RQ-7 Shadows, but the addition of the MQ-1C is a major step up, 160th SOAR officials said.

“It’s like comparing apples and elephants,” Sgt. First Class Jason Guenther, U.S. Army Special Operations Aviation Command UAS NCOIC, said in a statement. “There’s no comparisons between the Shadow and the Eagle.”

“The Shadow is geared towards a specific area of operations, Guenther said. “The Gray Eagle can go anywhere; it has greater endurance and a larger range.”

16oth SOAR slotted the Grey Eagles in E Company, which will be temporarily stationed at For Huachuca, Ariz. The company will be made up of roughly 12 Gray Eagles and 165 personnel. Once construction is complete, E Company will be permanently stationed in Fort Campbell, Ky.

Share |

{ 32 comments… read them below or add one }

Andy December 12, 2013 at 12:01 pm

What about the Marine's and Navy ?

Reply

Hector Q December 12, 2013 at 1:29 pm

The Navy has the X-47B demonstration UAV which can operate from carriers, go long distances, and which will eventually become the basis for a fully operational platform.

Reply

Bronco46 December 12, 2013 at 10:50 pm

I haven't seen any weapons bays mentioned in the X-47 specs. Have I missed something? Without weapons the X-47 would have less capabilities then the
Grey Eagle.

Reply

Navy Seal 9009 December 13, 2013 at 7:21 am

Naval Air Systems Command has set the parameters for the X-47 which would allow it to carry ground attack weapons.

Reply

Riceball December 13, 2013 at 11:51 am

The X-47B is only a tech demonstrator, it's not meant to be an operational aircraft. The Navy is simply using it to test the concept, develop tactics, and operational procedures and once that's all done and over with the Navy will then (in theory) work on developing an operational UCAS. Of course with the budget cuts and all it may be possible that the future Navy UCAS will end up be an X-47 minus the X.

Reply

John Johnson December 12, 2013 at 1:37 pm

I can imagine a conversation like this:

Q: Dang, you fly for 160th SOAR?
A: .. yeah ..
Q: What do you fly?
A: a drone…

Reply

andy December 12, 2013 at 2:06 pm

Dude, Drone can sneak in and kill the Terrorist without hearing or seeing can the F18 or any other fighter jet do the same ?????

Reply

FormerDirtDart December 12, 2013 at 7:19 pm

Umm..yes.

Reply

andy December 12, 2013 at 7:23 pm

first of.
F18 cannot circle around the village 24 hours quietly…get it ?

Reply

andy December 12, 2013 at 8:14 pm

speaking of moron, ya'll should know Drone are use for ?

tiger December 21, 2013 at 9:05 am

Uh, do not knock it. They are doing more bad guy killing than most other pilots. Plus no down pilots to rescue.

andy December 12, 2013 at 8:16 pm

Umn…no, the Army can call in for air support but the Enemy can hear they coming…

Reply

Bronco46 December 12, 2013 at 10:41 pm

And it won't leave behind a classified tail rotor either

Reply

Nathan December 13, 2013 at 3:50 am
majr0d December 13, 2013 at 4:55 am

Yes. I've had fast movers do high speed low level passes and be gone before I ever knew they were there. They could have nailed me from miles away as they fly much higher than a drone.

Reply

hibeam December 12, 2013 at 2:30 pm

All the drones in the world won't do any good if the Commander in Golf is too timid to use them.

Reply

Bronco46 December 12, 2013 at 10:45 pm

I am no fan of the current President and have been voting Republican since Reagan; but this President has been blasting the hell out of lots of people (even and American or two). What's surprising about that is the whole of the Democratic party has been quiet about that. You have wonder if President Bush, or if Romney had gotten elected they would have gotten the same pass.

Reply

Musson December 13, 2013 at 10:02 am

The President is Mr. Drone. He went so far as to tell his White House crew that he was 'really good at killing people.' He has used the drones far more than anyone else. I don't like the guy. But, he has had no hesitation in employing drones.

Reply

Really? December 21, 2013 at 10:30 am

hibeam, my friend, you are so good at writing sarcasms.

Under Obama, US military has killed tens of thousands in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, and some other N. African and M.E. countries. Many of such killings involved use of drones day and night. Some human rights organizations claim the figure may be over 100,000. Remember, such killings are all in violation of international law, i.e. they are war crimes. The US can do it because nobody in the world can take US leaders to court.

As you know, Obama is a Nobel Peace prize holder. Yet the number of civilians killed by US military drones far exceeds that under GW Bush and Cheney. (note: killed by drones, not other means).

Obama deserves a Nobel War prize now.

Reply

Jeff Nmi Ruiz December 12, 2013 at 7:30 pm

just a little editorial nit-picking but…
The title of the article calls it the "Grey Eagle" but within the article itself, it is referred to as the "GRAY Eagle". Which is it?

Reply

jamesb December 12, 2013 at 9:12 pm

Now the Army's SOAR just needs to deliver these assets via their OWN C-27J's….

How sweet…..

Reply

Bronco46 December 12, 2013 at 10:46 pm

I like it! Good call!

Reply

RunningBear December 13, 2013 at 12:51 am

You mean, MC-27J! (new to the Italian Air Force (AMI), 2014) :)

Reply

majr0d December 13, 2013 at 5:12 am

Army SF are not only limited to TF160 and Air Force Predators. The conventional Army has been flying predators since 2008. Hellfires have been launched in Afghanistan last year. 50 systems are in operation with over two companies of a targeted 10 fielded.

A key difference in Air Force and Army predator application is that the Army attaches its predators to the ground commander so they are available when needed vs. having to compete with all units in theatre for support. The operators are also stationed with the ground unit so they develop relationships with the supported unit vs. every mission potentially being a first time event for someone in the equation.

Reply

Jay D Levine December 13, 2013 at 1:01 pm

Why don,t they just call it Sky King instead of grey eagle?

Reply

Jay D Levine December 13, 2013 at 1:02 pm

grey eagle sounds like a drunk old indian

Reply

tiger December 21, 2013 at 9:35 am

All Army Aviation tools use American Indian names. Ie. Apache, Blackhawk, Iroquois.

with

Reply

Really? December 21, 2013 at 12:30 pm

Seems there are more Army Aviation tools with American Indians names than actual number of American Indians still alive.

Reply

Jay D Levine December 13, 2013 at 1:05 pm

this is the type of MOS i wanted to be in instead of Air Defense Artillery, I use to fly Teeny Weeny Airlines (RCMAT) for the ADA Units

Reply

Jamesb December 15, 2013 at 7:20 pm

thanks for the 411 majrOd….

Now maybe if the Army could 'borrow' some A-10's or Tuscano's?

Reply

gt350 December 28, 2013 at 2:03 am

How about Mohammad's EYE. just couldn't resist .

Reply

ENJ December 28, 2013 at 3:28 am

Apparently Mr. Hoffman, you need to verify your sources. It is not only the Air Force that provides assistance in ISR for SOAR units. The Army has been flying MQ-1Cs for a while, so to say that it only is dependent upon Air Force Predators that are flown from a control station in the States is a gross error.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: