Home » Sea » Navy, Electric Boat Test Tube-Launched Underwater Vehicle

Navy, Electric Boat Test Tube-Launched Underwater Vehicle

by Kris Osborn on January 28, 2014

ULRMGroton, Conn. – The Navy and General Dynamics Electric Boat are testing a prototype of a system that would allow the launch and recovery of unmanned underwater vehicles and other payloads  from the missile tube of a cruise missile submarine.

Called the Universal Launch and Recovery Module, the system houses, launches and recovers an underwater vehicle, a Lockheed-built 10,000-pound prototype vehicle called Marlin, from the submarine’s missile tube.

The system is showing promise in early testing and is slated to go sea aboard a guided missile, nuclear powered submarine (SSGN) next year, Electric Boat officials said.

“This is real prototyping to actually go and exercise the system before we put it on an SSGN and take it to sea,” Adm. David Johnson, Program Executive Officer, Submarines, said at the 2013 Naval Submarine League Annual Symposium, Va., in October.

ULRM2The system is designed for a range of potential underwater missions to include counter-mine patrol, sonar or other intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) missions.

“Submarines have the ability to get really close to something. That is a big advantage,” said Franz Edson, director, mission systems & business development, General Dynamics Electric Boat.

The prototype vehicle is hooked up to temporary hydraulics and engineered to acquire a buoy at the top of the missile tube using a transponder, said Edson.

“It comes out of a tube, rotates, and then deploys. It goes off and does its thing — mine warfare, ISR, etc. –Then it comes back and it mates with that buoy before it is brought back down into the tube,” Edson said.

Once a tactical version of the technology is built, it will fill up the launch tube out to 60-inches in diameter and stretch as long as 23-feet, Edson said. The vehicle could weigh up to 30,000-pounds, he added.

The prototype vehicle is controlled by two laptop computers, removing the need to adjust the infrastructure of the submarine in order to accommodate the system, Edson explained.

“It is a gigantic elevator that will take up to 30,000 pounds and raise it from inside the ship to outside the ship. We’re not modifying the submarine’s infrastructure to control this,” Edson said.

In addition to being configured to swim from an SSGN, the system is also being configured by Electric Boat and the Navy to work from the Virginia Payload Modules of Virginia-Class attack submarines to begin construction by 2019, Edson said.

Virginia Payload Modules, or VPM, consist of an effort to increase the missile firing capability of Virginia-Class submarines from 12 to 40 vertically fired missiles.

Share |

{ 38 comments… read them below or add one }

Andy January 28, 2014 at 4:00 pm

China claim entire S. sea…soon we will have to paid the fee and we cannot move freely aorund the S sea, this is why we need 30 or more this kind of Sub…China have a few hundre of Sub can continue to build more and more….

Reply

Greg January 29, 2014 at 12:20 am

Lol, you say we when you clearly not from here.

China could not detect a b-52 in their adz. How can the my sense everything in the south china sea

Reply

John January 29, 2014 at 12:51 pm

… that stealthy 1950's tech on those BUFFs

Reply

Edward Cafarella January 29, 2014 at 8:46 am

Freedom of thre seas and keeping the shipping lanes open for commerce is the primary duty of the navy. Let teh Chinese try that…they'll be harrased by our navy like kadaffi was in the 80's. They need shipping there to buy their goods, they'd never do it.

Reply

marsdentar January 29, 2014 at 11:48 am

Edward keep in mind the joker we have in the white house currently he couldnt harrass a housefly if it came buzzing by

Reply

A Patriotic Gamer January 29, 2014 at 12:23 pm

He would if it was a consertive house fly

Reply

PolicyWonk January 28, 2014 at 4:19 pm

Perhaps this development means that the Virginia extend-the-hull to make room for more cruise missiles (and a contingent of SoF's) program isn't dead yet. The Ohio SSGN variants will be retired before very long, and if we want to retain this capability the development/procurement work will have to get moving soon.

The POTUS included a pile of dough in his proposed defense budget for that program, but all the money was removed by the House Of Representatives.

Reply

PolicyWonk January 29, 2014 at 7:54 am

News Flash!

According to DoDBuzz, the Virginia Payload Module funding was approved, and will is being designed into the Block V version of these boats. This will up the number of cruise missiles from 12 to 40 by adding a 70 section to the hull, adding a considerable punch to these already impressive boats.

Reply

blight_ January 28, 2014 at 4:26 pm

Hmm. Deploy minisubs from tubes for commando delivery, ASubW, AShipW?

They would make an interesting defense for SSBNs: If being tailed, deploy a small SSK for protection.

Reply

@GreensboroVet January 28, 2014 at 5:30 pm

Blight_. I see a Virginia, sitting off the coast and sending this into the shallows looking for those electric and diesel subs. Never know what hit them. Another example, Virginia patrolling at 5 knots with one or two of these things deployed out in front. _

Reply

Tom Billings January 28, 2014 at 9:38 pm

"Deploy minisubs from tubes for commando delivery, ASubW, AShipW?

For each of those, but most often for mine hunting. People like to forget that for naval warfare mines sink more ships per dollar spent than anything else. Mines are not glamorous, but an intel report of disguised bottom mines in a strait his task force *must* pass through to do its job is still the best way to give an Admiral ulcers. Add CAPTOR technology to that and you'd get a TF retiring and going the long way around. It should be hoped that these robots can even that balance up a bit.

Reply

kuzinov January 28, 2014 at 4:30 pm

A big ROV could perform lots of classified tasks. A very interesting project if you've read Blindman's Bluff.

Reply

blight_ January 28, 2014 at 4:59 pm

Which reminds me; NR-1 will be missed.

I wonder if the Navy would keep another one on the books; or if that kind of thing would go to the CIA.

Reply

kuzinov January 28, 2014 at 5:17 pm

ROV technology makes going to the trouble of putting humans in it not worth it. Bob Ballard noticed it when people were looking at the video screens instead of the portholes when the newer higher definition video technology came around. A 5' x 23' space is too small to cram gear and people in and have it do something useful, the same dimensions, minus life support, now we're talking.

Reply

JohnnyRanger January 30, 2014 at 7:48 pm

Read somewhere that the USS Jimmy Carter replicates some of those capabilities (cable tapping, etc.)

Reply

blight_ January 31, 2014 at 9:43 am

So we're told. More likely than not, Jimmy Carter won't have wheels and manipulators: that would require a fair amount of rework.

ROV programs are definitely easier to hide: perhaps the extension is just to hold ROVs?

Reply

blight_ January 28, 2014 at 5:10 pm
Stephen N Russell January 28, 2014 at 4:47 pm

Other uses for:
shoreline Recon
ID SEAL Team for pickup
ID wreckage
scan for lost weapons ( 1966 Palomares Spain H Bomb event).

Reply

@GreensboroVet January 28, 2014 at 5:31 pm

Right on Stephen Right on.

Reply

Lance January 28, 2014 at 5:20 pm

Kind of a cute little robot LOL.

Reply

Taylor January 28, 2014 at 5:34 pm

Why do we announce this kind of stuff? Wouldn't want to have an unfair advantage?

Reply

ronaldo January 30, 2014 at 2:12 pm

The cost of keeping it secret costs beaucoup dollars. How much secrecy do you want to pay for ? Speak up…it's your money.

Sheesh !

Reply

ziv January 28, 2014 at 5:38 pm

I looked at the picture and thought, "Oh, sh**, it is an underwater Little Boy!"

Reply

Anon E. Mouse January 29, 2014 at 12:11 am

I want a percentage. The NSA has obviously been peeking while I've been typing my novel!

Reply

game January 29, 2014 at 2:32 am

Hello there! Do you know if they make any plugins to protect against hackers?
I’m kinda paranoid about losing everything I’ve worked hard on.

Any tips?

Reply

oblatt2 January 29, 2014 at 9:01 am

The navy squeals how it doesnt have enough SSBNs for nuclear deterrent but hey if you need one to insert a seal team or clear some mines or some other marginal mission there are plenty.

Reply

blight_ January 29, 2014 at 9:10 am

We need to get away from using tubes to deploy payloads. We can't build extra SSBN's just to do this and use their tubes to deploy payloads and internal space for TLAMs and commandos. At the moment we have extra Ohios because we are pulling them off of nuke duty; but this is a long term thing we should go away from. Small subs for special missions, not the biggest, oldest SSBN's we have.

I wonder how successful a sub with a mini-nuke reactor would be; especially considering NR-1's vague success in the '60s. Though…maybe the '60s were America's best years; even if the computers sucked.

Reply

John K January 29, 2014 at 1:54 pm

SSBNs ONLY perform nuclear deterrent missions, and NOTHING else. EVER.

In the early 2000s our four oldest SSBNs were taken out of service and heavily modified. They no longer carry nuclear weapons, but carry conventional TLAM missiles in large quanties and can carry and deploy large numbers of SEALs.

There are no plans whatsover to modify any other SSBNs.

Reply

@kybkh January 29, 2014 at 9:51 am

Navy is working on a system to tail every foreign sub in the ocean. Once that is achieved we might have a chance to actually win a nuclear war or prevent one. Scrap the surface vessels and give me 20 subs per carrier and a couple of Littorals for coastal patrols.

Reply

hibeam January 29, 2014 at 3:33 pm

It looks impressive but can it help us win the war on women? They are rascally devils.

Reply

Emilio February 26, 2014 at 10:32 am

hello!,I love your writing so a lot! proportion we be in contact more approximately your post on AOL?

I require a specialist on this space to resolve my problem.
May be that’s you! Having a look ahead to look you.

Reply

Ralph February 28, 2014 at 10:57 am

I’m not sure why but this weblog is loading extremely slow
for me. Is anyone else having this issue or is it a problem on my end?
I’ll check back later on and see if the problem still exists.

Reply

Katherina March 12, 2014 at 5:22 am

I was recommended this blog by means of my cousin.
I am not certain whether or not this post is written through him as no one else recognize such detailed approximately my difficulty.
You’re wonderful! Thanks!

Reply

sprawdzian z historii 1 liceum i wojna swiatowa April 3, 2014 at 7:48 pm

Simply desire to say your article is as astounding. The clarity in your post is just great and i can assume you are an
expert on this subject. Well with your permission allow me to grab your RSS feed to keep up
to date with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please continue the enjoyable work.

Reply

computer repair harlow April 4, 2014 at 11:26 am

It may also come in regular maintenance and audits to ensure your system continues to work efficiently to
meet your needs. This is important because if the vendor does not have the latest facilities, they will not
be able to offer top-class IT support to their client.
Unless you will be presenting from your own PC, be very wary of using any fonts outside that standard font load.

Reply

justdontcallmelatefordinner.com April 4, 2014 at 8:55 pm

Oh my goodness! Awesome article dude! Thank you, However I am
experiencing issues with your RSS. I don’t understand why I cannot subscribe to it.
Is there anybody else having the same RSS problems? Anyone who knows the solution can you kindly respond?
Thanks!!

Reply

Alisia April 9, 2014 at 5:18 am

Today, I went to the beachfront with my kids. I found a sea shell
and gave it to my 4 year old daughter and said “You can hear the ocean if you put this to your ear.” She put the shell to her
ear and screamed. There was a hermit crab inside and it pinched her ear.
She never wants to go back! LoL I know this is entirely off topic but I had to tell someone!

Reply

lower bounce rate July 10, 2014 at 12:05 pm

Pretty nixe post. I sinply stumgled upn your weblog and wahted to mention that I’ve truly loved
surfing around your blog posts. In any case I’ll be subscribing
inn your feed aand Iaam hoping you write again soon!

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: