About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Around the Globe

Swedish Military Looking for New Body Armor (sort of)

Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009

sweedish-female-troops.jpg

Ripped from the head­lines at Military.com — I think this is one we can all sup­port

Swedish female sol­diers are demand­ing the mil­i­tary pro­vide them with combat-tested bras, amid com­plaints that the sports bras they must buy them­selves unhook too eas­ily, offi­cials say.

Unlike their male coun­ter­parts who are pro­vided with military-issue under­wear, Sweden’s 500-odd women con­scripts must buy bras them­selves since there are no military-issue brassieres, accord­ing to the Council of Conscripts, a union-like organisation.

“The women have had to buy sports bras instead. But they are not tested for com­bat sit­u­a­tions nor for fire safety, and they are not func­tional. They unhook too eas­ily,” Council spokes­woman Paulina Rehbinder told AFP.

She crit­i­cised the mil­i­tary for its lack of gen­der equal­ity, in a coun­try widely con­sid­ered a pio­neer in the field.

“This sends a sig­nal to women. You should be able to come to your work­place and be pro­vided with equip­ment that works and that is safe,” she said.

“There have been women in the Swedish mil­i­tary for more than 30 years but bras have never been pro­vided by the mil­i­tary,” she lamented, not­ing how­ever that the mil­i­tary gave con­scripts money to buy their bras. 

Best com­ment from Military.com read­ers “Swedish made bras unhook eas­ily. Who would have ever guessed?”

I stand ready to lend a hand in the upcom­ing “com­bat tests”…any other volunteers?

– Christian

Russian Marines Getting New Ride

Wednesday, August 26th, 2009

mistral.jpg

And we’re WORRIED about the Russians?

Russia said Wednesday it plans to buy a new helicopter-carrying assault war­ship from NATO-member France in an unprece­dented deal experts say reflects Kremlin efforts to accel­er­ate mil­i­tary modernization.

The agree­ment for pur­chase of one Mistral-class naval ship also equipped with hov­er­craft and land­ing craft will be com­pleted by the end of the year, the Russian chief of staff, General Nikolai Makarov, said.

He did not name a price, but the Russian gov­ern­ment daily Rossiiskaya Gazeta reported this month that the ship, which can carry 16 heavy heli­copters, 470 air­borne troops and other gear, costs 700 mil­lion euros (995 mil­lion dollars). 

So Ivan wants to build an amphibi­ous capa­bil­ity for what? An inva­sion of Georgia…OK, good luck with that MedvedevPutin. And your defense man­u­fac­tur­ing and ship­build­ing infra­struc­ture is so mori­bund you have to buy from the French!? Ouch, that’s gotta hurt Mr. “Multi-polar World” guy.

But, oh yeah, you want to do “joint” pro­duc­tion later — uh, huh…

Makarov also said Russia wanted to forge a deal with France on joint pro­duc­tion of more ships.

“We also want to estab­lish pro­duc­tion of a series of at least four or five ships of this class,” he said.

Makarov, an influ­en­tial pro­po­nent in Russia of mod­ern­iz­ing the country’s con­ven­tional armed forces quickly through pro­cure­ment from Western sup­pli­ers, admit­ted the mil­i­tary needs equip­ment that Russia can­not pro­duce at present.

“No coun­try in the world can do every­thing” on its own, he said, adding: “Some things will have to be pur­chased” from for­eign producers. 

Hey, I know…We have an F-22 man­u­fac­tur­ing line Congress wants to keep open — the Russians are “look­ing to the West” to mod­ern­ize — Obama’s reach­ing out to rebuild strained ties — hmmm.

How ironic would it be to turn the F-22 argu­ment on its head and say it’s needed to sup­ply the very enemy it was designed to fight?

…I guess I need some more coffee.

– Christian

Tyrants and Nukes

Monday, July 27th, 2009

nuke.jpg
It has been well doc­u­mented that India did not attack Pakistan after the Mumbai ter­ror attacks sim­ply because Pakistan has nuclear bombs. This has not been lost on tyran­ni­cal regimes who are now at var­i­ous stages of procur­ing nuclear weapons. Recently there have been reports that North Korea is seek­ing to sell the nuclear tech­nol­ogy to Myanmar/Burma. A month ago, it was reported that a cash-trapped Pakistan would sell The Bomb to Saudi Arabia. Iran’s pur­suit of nuclear weapons is well known and even Israel’s worst-kept secret, its 400-plus nuclear weapons, evinces the degree to which that coun­try appre­ci­ates their deter­rent value as it goes out of its way to infu­ri­ate its neigh­bors in the pur­suit of “national defense.”
According to Reuters, Western pol­i­cy­mak­ers are most alarmed by Iran and Syria’s desire to boost their nuclear capa­bil­ity. Washington says Pyongyang has already exported mis­siles and mis­sile tech­nol­ogy to Iran and nuclear tech­nol­ogy to Syria. Al Qaeda and related groups are actively seek­ing nuclear mate­ri­als and know-how, and ana­lysts say North Korea would be one of their most likely sources. (Full news here.)
So if you look at the list of coun­tries fast-tracking nuclear weapons pro­grams they are all dic­ta­to­r­ial or tyran­ni­cal regimes seek­ing to ensure their sur­viv­abil­ity. Luckily Pakistan and North Korea are there to help them, backed by China. (Read “Why China spread nuclear tech­nolo­gies to rogue nations”.) Both coun­tries des­per­ately need cash and believe that any nuclear attack from the buy­ing coun­try is more likely to be aimed at the U.S. or a joint task-force like the U.N. in which case they may band together any­way. (Hillary Clinton is deceiv­ing her­self when she said that Myanmar pos­sess­ing nuclear weapons is a threat to its neigh­bors.)
After China has spread nuclear weapons tech­nol­ogy, now Chinese Chief of Staff Gen Bingde now says (see Globalsecurity arti­cle) that they are seri­ously con­cerned about North Korea get­ting nuclear tech­nol­ogy as it may pro­pel South Korea and Japan to get deter­rent nuclear weapons as well.
– Manu Sood, edi­tor, 8ak

India’s Ammo Storage Problem

Saturday, July 18th, 2009

India ammo.jpg
In 1999 the Indian gov­ern­ment had not sanc­tioned money for sheds in one of the depots, so the ammu­ni­tion was lying in the open, grassy fields. Instead of pay­ing some­one to cut the grass, the prac­tice was that the grass was sold at an auc­tioned price. As is com­mon, the local farmer/contractors form a car­tel to keep the bid amounts low and work out among them­selves how to share the money saved.

The local audit offi­cer had placed an objec­tion on the depot for sell­ing the grass in the pre­vi­ous auc­tion at a low con­tract price. So when the ten­der bids for the next sale of grass were opened, the bids were even lower. So the Commander of the depot ordered re-tendering to avoid fur­ther objec­tions by the local audit offi­cer who can get very petty. In the mean­time the grass had grown quite high and was dried up by the sun. It sub­se­quently caught fire and hun­dreds of crores worth of ammu­ni­tion was lost. The Commander felt that this was accept­able to audi­tor rather than the loss of a few thou­sand rupees by way of con­tract nego­ti­a­tions with local farmers.

In a sim­i­lar inci­dent in 2007 , two Army per­son­nel died and the Police had to evac­u­ate vil­lagers within a 30km radius when an ammu­ni­tion dump caught fire.

Think the gov­ern­ment would have learnt their les­son then? Apparently not. The Defense Minister admit­ted in front of the par­lia­ment today that about 85,000 MT of ammu­ni­tion was still lying in the open or in tem­po­rary shel­ters.

(Photo — From Bob Fagelson’s col­lec­tion, the ammo dump at Kanchrapara, circa 1946)

– Manu Sood, edi­tor, 8ak — Indian Defence News

The Forgotten War

Monday, July 6th, 2009

Philippino Che.jpg
My friend Michael Yon, writ­ing from the islands:

Until recently, Afghanistan was called The Forgotten War. The dra­matic domes­tic, regional, and inter­na­tional pol­i­tics of the Iraq war largely eclipsed the fact that our peo­ple were fight­ing just as hard in Afghanistan. Although were pay­ing atten­tion to AfPak now, off the radar screen an impor­tant and related fight has been unfold­ing in the Philippines.
At the invi­ta­tion of the Philippine gov­ern­ment, the U.S. main­tains about 600 troops, includ­ing Army Green Berets, Civil Affairs, and Military Information Support teams, Navy SEALS and Seabees, along with Air Force per­son­nel and Marines. Our mil­i­tary forces are deployed in six loca­tions: Zamboanga, Mindanao, Jolo, Basilan, Tawi Tawi, and a small num­ber of liai­son staff on Luzon. Their mis­sion is to help the Armed Forces of the Philippines elim­i­nate ter­ror­ist groups like Jemaah Islamiyah and the Abu Sayyaf Group and to pre­vent them from estab­lish­ing safe havens from which to train other ter­ror­ists, both inter­nal and external.

Read the whole thing, the details are fas­ci­nat­ing. Open this up to a dis­cus­sion on whether or not it was wise of the Philippine gov­ern­ment to boot us from Subic Bay and Clark Air Base (keep­ing in mind that the Moro Islamic Liberation Front –at the time of our expul­sion– was still rel­a­tively quiet and had yet to declare jihad on the local gov­ern­ment).
John Noonan

Brits Getting new Armor

Friday, June 26th, 2009

brit-armor.jpg

The British mil­i­tary announced today it has begun field­ing an updated ver­sion of its Mk7 hel­met and Osprey body armor.

The new Osprey Assault Vest is sup­posed to have the same bal­lis­tic capa­bil­i­ties of the cur­rent Osprey but with less weight and bet­ter, closer fit. I have no first-hand insight into this armor, but from the pics that are drift­ing around the web on this, it doesn’t look any more com­fort­able than the cur­rent Brit bul­let busters.

The MOD did say the armor takes advan­tage of a new bal­lis­tic plate that is thin­ner and lighter than cur­rent ones — clearly a sys­tem using more improved Dyneema or Spectra. Also the vest bor­rows from its Yank coun­ter­parts in adding MOLLE web­bing to attach pouches and other gear directly to the vest. But just from the look of it, the vest doesn’t look like much of an improve­ment in fit. Kinda like when the Corps fielded its “Modular Tactical Vest” that looked like a Rube Goldberg patch­work of bad ideas (and turned out to be widely unpopular).

On the other hand, the Brits look like they’re finally tak­ing a rad­i­cal depar­ture from their spaghetti bowl hel­mets and get­ting a lit­tle more 21st Century on their new Mk7. The new hel­met fea­tures a bet­ter cut that allows for head­phones, NVGs and keeps its cov­er­age even in a prone aim­ing posi­tion. There’s also an updated and more com­fort­able har­ness sys­tem to keep the lid on the noggin.

Again, haven’t seen any of this first hand. But you know me and my obses­sion with armor devel­op­ments, so I thought I’d bring it to your atten­tion. If any­one has any insight into these sys­tems, please com­ment here or send me an email.

The UK plans to field about 10,000 of the new ensembles.

(Gouge: GW)

– Christian

Bundeswehr Inspector General: German Troopies an “Embarassment”

Wednesday, June 17th, 2009

german army.jpg
From the horse’s mouth, so they say, German sol­diers “are soft­ies who lack dis­ci­pline, hate respon­si­bil­ity and show an inad­e­quate desire to serve their coun­try.”

General Wolfgang Schneiderhahn, the gen­eral inspec­tor of the Bundeswehr, told the German par­lia­ment that depite their pos­i­tive con­tri­bu­tion in Afghanistan, com­plaints from troops about their con­di­tions were an “embar­rass­ment”.
“We have given a good account of our­selves in Afghanistan, but we can­not guar­an­tee an all-round feel-good feel­ing for sol­diers,” said the gen­eral, before going on to detail the less dig­ni­fied side of the country’s armed forces.
He cited com­plaints reach­ing him about the qual­ity of sleep­ing bags used in a deploy­ment in the Congo.
“Are our sol­diers too soft?” asked the best-selling daily German news­pa­per Bild.
Gen Schneiderhahn told politi­cians in Berlin on Monday that the descen­dants of the country’s mighty mil­i­tary machines of the past needed to have “a bet­ter feel­ing for dis­ci­pline and to show a greater readi­ness to serve the state”. 

Interesting devo­lu­tion, from what was once the most feared mil­i­tary machine in the world to noth­ing more than a glo­ri­fied gen­darmerie. In fair­ness to our Kraut allies, this is largely a polit­i­cal prob­lem, in that the Germans are –under­stand­ably, given their his­tory– reluc­tant to use mil­i­tary force out­side their bor­ders. Remember that up until 1994, the Bundeswehr was restricted to bor­der defense only.
Here, war might be the answer. There’s noth­ing more demor­al­iz­ing to a com­bat unit than to be demoted to occu­pa­tional force (the German army mainly does peace­keep­ing and recon­struc­tion). Allowing the Germans to fight in Afghanistan, along­side their British, Dutch, American, and Canadian allies, could jump­start their inner war­riors — and hope­fully give them more impor­tant to worry about than sleep­ing bags.
John Noonan

MULLAHS VS. PIRATES: SOLUTION, OR NEW PROBLEMS?

Monday, May 11th, 2009

somali-pirates.jpg

For Somali Pirates, Worst Enemy May Be on Shore,” in the New York Times on May 9, fea­tured an inter­view with Puntland pirate boss Abshir Boyah, who claims to have hijacked more than 25 ships. Boyah says he’s wor­ried because Islamic cler­ics would like to cut off his hands as an un-Islamic thief, and drive him and his ilk out of town and out of busi­ness. His solu­tion? Let the mul­lahs find jobs for his hijack­ing crews that pay nearly as well as their booty does now — and help senior pirates like him form a Somalian coast guard. 

To me, Boyah comes across like he’s toy­ing with his inter­viewer and bait­ing the cler­ics. The pirate groups are armed to the teeth with AK-47s and RPGs that they can use ashore just as well as at sea. They may be an irre­li­gious lot, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t united and moti­vated by a sig­nif­i­cant shared set of val­ues: Boyah describes piracy like the sport of hunt­ing, and nego­ti­at­ing as a “reli­gion.” Pirate lead­ers feel deeply obliged to sup­port their fam­i­lies and clans. Social pres­tige plus mate­ri­al­ist dis­si­pa­tion in this life can be cher­ished by some just as much as a sure path to Heaven in the next life is cher­ished by oth­ers. Somali cul­ture in gen­eral puts high stock in not back­ing down from con­flict and con­fronta­tion, even when things do turn deadly. 

Many of the pirates recently arrested in their skiffs and dhows by inter­na­tional naval forces were quickly set free, mak­ing the threat of pros­e­cu­tion no real deter­rent. Withholding for­eign aid and char­ity is prob­lem­atic; eco­nomic sanc­tions usu­ally strengthen the grip of tyrants and war­lords. One won­ders whether the Puntland cler­ics mean busi­ness about any crack­down, or are just talk­ing tough, hold­ing out (nego­ti­at­ing?) for a take of the big pirate prizes. 

For the West and other inter­ested par­ties to look to local Muslim cler­ics to dimin­ish Somalian piracy will likely prove inef­fec­tive. Counter-terror experts are con­cerned that Islamo-fascists such as al Qaeda might hire or infil­trate the pirates, or study and adapt ship hijack­ing tac­tics them­selves. If mul­lah mili­tias do go after Boyah’s crowd, the pirates will surely fight back, lead­ing to more civil war all along the strate­gi­cally located Somali coast. The chaos would cre­ate a power vac­uum into which could pour nau­ti­cal sui­cide bombers led by fanat­i­cal lead­ers. The beef of Puntland cler­ics is with piracy-financed spend­ing on sin­ful liquor, ille­gal drugs, and illicit sex. To let this benign moral­ist agenda be replaced by al Qaeda’s pur­pose of destroy­ing whole soci­eties would be a grave error indeed.

(more…)

CNO (IN PRC) TO USN: REMEMBER MIDWAY!

Friday, April 24th, 2009

roughead-china.jpg

Is it just a coin­ci­dence that, on 21 April, Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Gary Roughead ordered the U.S. Navy to begin prepar­ing to mark the 67th anniver­sary of the Battle of Midway, 4–7 June, while he was in China 16–22 April for the People’s Liberation Army Navy’s 60th aniver­sary? China used an inter­na­tional fleet review held at Qingdao to show off to the world some impressive-looking (but not their very best) PLAN assets, includ­ing two first-generation home-built nuclear subs. Midway marks a deci­sive American vic­tory over Imperial Japan, China’s nextdoor neigh­bor and the last Asian coun­try (so far) to quickly build a mod­ern navy — and go to war with it in the Pacific.

Roughead’s order reminds its read­ers that Midway put America back on the offen­sive only six months after the dis­as­trous sur­prise attack on Pearl Harbor, at a time when the IJN out­num­bered the USN due to a gap in longterm ship­build­ing pro­grams com­bined with asym­met­ric bat­tle losses; there is also today real con­cern about the ade­quacy of the cur­rent USN longterm ship­build­ing pro­gram. Interestingly, Roughead goes on to reach back to the Great Depression to praise the “inno­va­tion and resilience,” in what con­struc­tion did occur and in tac­ti­cal devel­op­ment, that dur­ing the 1930s lay the ground­work for suc­cess at Midway in 1942; cur­rent eco­nomic con­di­tions are notably more harsh than any­thing since the Great Depression.

Each fleet con­cen­tra­tion area and regional com­mand around the world (such as Pearl Harbor, Guam, and Yokosuka) is to pre­pare and then com­mu­ni­cate, to both sailors and civil­ian com­mu­ni­ties, a knowl­edge base about Midway and its vet­er­ans, with a coor­di­nated global wreath-laying cer­e­mony, “to carry their legacy for­ward.” Roughead’s order charges the Naval History and Heritage Command (NHHC) and the Chief of Naval Information (CHINFO) with prepar­ing a Battle of Midway les­son plan and a pub­lic affairs plan.

These edu­ca­tional prod­ucts, with their use by local com­man­ders, will be cru­cial to the suc­cess of the CNO’s direc­tive to pre­serve his­tory, learn from the past, and pre­pare for the future.

At a time when infor­ma­tion is power like never before, and soft power is very real power, this con­flu­ence of USN and PLAN anniver­saries — if han­dled prop­erly — could “fos­ter rela­tion­ships between the two nations and explore areas for enhanced coop­er­a­tion,” which the CNO’s PAO says was the main pur­pose of Rougheads’ visit to Qingdao.

Joe Buff

Drug Related Violence Becomes Drug War

Wednesday, March 4th, 2009

Juarez.jpg

Courtesy The Daily Mail: 2,000 Mexican sol­diers and fed­eral police rein­force the exist­ing con­tin­gent of 2,500 troops in Juarez. Fighting between rival drug car­tels, gangs, and Mexican author­i­ties claimed over 6,000 lives in 2008 — mak­ing Juarez a beefed up, 21st cen­tury ver­sion of Dodge City.
–John Noonan