<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>Defense Tech &#187; Blimps</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/category/blimps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:46:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>Giant Blimp, Deflated</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/03/28/giant-blimp-deflated/</link> <comments>http://defensetech.org/2006/03/28/giant-blimp-deflated/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:39:23 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>david_axe</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Blimps]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3100</guid> <description><![CDATA[No!  Nooooo!  Say it ain’t so, Darpa!  The Walrus program — the fringe-science agency’s awesomely, almost insanely, ambitious plan to build an aircraft carrier-sized blimp — is over, Defense Technology International discovers.
Congress had always been skeptical about the idea of an airship that could schlep 500‑1000 tons halfway around the world.  [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No! <em>Nooooo!</em> Say it ain’t so, Darpa!  The <a
href="http://www.defensetech.org/archives/001043.html">Walrus</a> program — the fringe-science agency’s awesomely, almost insanely, ambitious plan to build an aircraft carrier-sized blimp — is over, <em><a
href="http://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/mh/dti0406/index.php">Defense Technology International</a></em> discovers.<br
/> <img
align=right img alt="walrus_HUGEish.jpg" src="http://www.defensetech.org/images/walrus_HUGEish.jpg" width="240" height="170" hspace="10" vspace="5" />Congress had always been skeptical about the idea of an airship that could <a
href="http://www.defensetech.org/archives/002088.html">schlep 500‑1000 tons halfway around the world</a>.  (After all, the Pentagon’s current go-to airborne hauler, the <a
href="http://tech.military.com/equipment/viewEquipment.do?eq_id=89227">C-130 Hercules</a> cargo plane, holds about 22 tons.)  But blimp-lovers had pushed the “<a
href="http://www.defensetech.org/archives/001775.html">tri-phibian</a>” (air, land, sea) Walrus as a way to make American forces less reliant on deep-water ports, foreign bases, and billion-dollar airports to wage war.<br
/> But it wasn’t meant to be.  Darpa took away the fiscal year 2006 funding for the Walrus.  And the agency’s <a
href="http://www.darpa.mil/body/pdf/FY07_Final.pdf">2007 budget request</a> calls for “termination of the Walrus effort.“<br
/> Now, the Army’s Surface Deployment and Distribution Command had its own plans for a <a
href="https://www.sddc.army.mil/Public/Doing%20Business%20with%20SDDC/New%20Initiatives/Mobilus">heavy-hauling airship</a>, too.  I’m checking to see if they’re still interested.  Keep your fingers crossed.<br
/> <strong>UPDATE 9:46 AM</strong>: Don’t get <em>too</em> bummed, blimp fans.  Darpa’s plan for an <a
href="http://www.defensetech.org/archives/000816.html">all-seeing airship</a> that tracks an entire battlefield at once is still intact.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2006/03/28/giant-blimp-deflated/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>27</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 13/19 queries in 0.006 seconds using apc

Served from: unknown.dal.cologlobal.com @ 2010-03-21 15:56:11 -->