<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Defense Tech &#187; Defense Tech Poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/category/defense-tech-poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 20:06:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Poll Results: Should the USMC Fly F-22s?</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/10/14/dt-poll-results-should-the-usmc-fly-f-22s/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2011/10/14/dt-poll-results-should-the-usmc-fly-f-22s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defense Tech Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35 Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast Movers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine Corps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raptor Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=14964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff telling lawmakers yesterday that the Pentagon may not be able to buy as many F-35 Joint Strike Fighters as planned, it seems like a good time to share the results of a poll we ran two weeks ago asking whether the Marines should buy F-22s instead of F-35Bs. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2011/10/14/dt-poll-results-should-the-usmc-fly-f-22s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Will the House Cyber Task Force’s Recommendations Work?</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/10/10/poll-will-the-house-cyber-task-forces-recommendations-work/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2011/10/10/poll-will-the-house-cyber-task-forces-recommendations-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cyber Security Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Tech Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net-Centric]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=14892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The widely anticipated report is finally out from the House of Representatives Cyber Task Force. The twenty page document, written by House Republicans, was released last week and as expected, opinions have begun to fly. One person I spoke with has even called the report “superficial.” Perhaps the best part of the document is where it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2011/10/10/poll-will-the-house-cyber-task-forces-recommendations-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DT Poll: How Effective Will the J-20 Be in Combat?</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/09/08/dt-poll-how-effective-will-the-j-20-be-in-combat/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2011/09/08/dt-poll-how-effective-will-the-j-20-be-in-combat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Around the Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balance of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Rising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Tech Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eye on China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast Movers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planes, Copters, Blimps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=14385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week we ran a poll asking readers what they think China’s J-20 stealth fighter will be used for. Nearly half of those who responded think it will be used as both a high-speed interceptor capable of taking out fighters, AWACS and tankers and as a long-range weapons truck designed to penetrate an enemy’s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2011/09/08/dt-poll-how-effective-will-the-j-20-be-in-combat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>91</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>J-20 Fighter Porn and a Poll</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/09/06/j-20-fighter-porn-and-a-poll/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2011/09/06/j-20-fighter-porn-and-a-poll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air-to-Air Combat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AirSea Battle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Around the Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balance of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Rising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Tech Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eye on China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast Movers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planes, Copters, Blimps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=14296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here’s some J-20 stealth fighter porn to start your short workweek. Enjoy these photo-montages of the the big fighter rolling and banking hard as its test pilots expand the plane’s flight envelope. Meanwhile, take the poll below the jump and tell us what missions you think China’s stealth jet will be used for.   Keep [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2011/09/06/j-20-fighter-porn-and-a-poll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DT Poll: A Contest for New Bomber’s Engines?</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/05/27/dt-poll-engine-contest-for-the-new-bomber/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2011/05/27/dt-poll-engine-contest-for-the-new-bomber/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 16:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Acquisition Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arms Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Tech Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planes, Copters, Blimps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Deadlies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=13065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you didn’t see this, it looks like Congress is trying to introduce JSF style engine competition into the Air Force’s next effort to build a high-performance aircraft; the “2018” or “next generation” or “daddy of the long range strike family” or whatever you want to call it bomber. Apparentlly, House Armed Services Committee members, the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2011/05/27/dt-poll-engine-contest-for-the-new-bomber/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>President Obama’s Cyber Security Plan</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/05/20/president-obama%e2%80%99s-cyber-security-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2011/05/20/president-obama%e2%80%99s-cyber-security-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 15:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cyber Security Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Tech Poll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=12976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Kevin Coleman — Defense Tech Cyberwarfare Correspondent U.S. President Barack Obama recently released his administration’s vision for improving cyberspace security and reducing the nation’s cyber risks. A cornerstone of the approach outlined at a high level is the requirement for greater cooperation between the Department of Homeland Security and private sector businesses on cyber [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2011/05/20/president-obama%e2%80%99s-cyber-security-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Should We Do With the Nine Marine One Replacement Choppers?</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/03/04/what-should-we-do-with-the-nine-marine-one-replacement-choppers/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2011/03/04/what-should-we-do-with-the-nine-marine-one-replacement-choppers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 18:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Acquisition Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arms Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Tech Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine Corps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planes, Copters, Blimps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=11684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the original presidential helicopter program was cancelled a couple  of years ago due to a ballooning costs, the program left nine completed and nearly completed Lockheed Martin-Augusta Westland-built VH-71 presidential choppers-in-waiting sitting in a government hangar. Well, after spending billions to develop the birds, doesn’t it make sense to do something with them? Now, sister [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2011/03/04/what-should-we-do-with-the-nine-marine-one-replacement-choppers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Russia Calls For Stuxnet Investigation</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/01/31/russia-calls-for-stuxnet-investigation/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2011/01/31/russia-calls-for-stuxnet-investigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cloak and Dagger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crazy Ivan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Security Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Tech Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nukes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=11270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Kevin Coleman — Defense Tech Cyber Warfare Correspondent As you may recall back in November 2010 President Ahmadinejad publicly admitted problems caused by the Stuxnet malware. Stuxnet is said to have impacted the Russian built nuclear enrichment equipment and is thought to have delayed their nuclear program between 1 and 3 years. Late last [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2011/01/31/russia-calls-for-stuxnet-investigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VH-71…You Decide</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/07/30/vh-71-you-decide/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2009/07/30/vh-71-you-decide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jnoonan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defense Tech Poll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2009/07/30/vh-71-you-decide/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should the VH-71 Stay or Should it Go?(survey software) – Christian]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2009/07/30/vh-71-you-decide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Up or down on Raptors?</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/07/14/up-or-down-on-raptors/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2009/07/14/up-or-down-on-raptors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defense Tech Poll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=4577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More F-22s — Yes or No(survey software)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2009/07/14/up-or-down-on-raptors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

