<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Defense Tech &#187; Gadgets and Gear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/category/gadgets-and-gear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 20:06:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>MoH-level Valor Leads to a Robot Hand</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/01/27/moh-level-valor-leads-to-a-robot-hand/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/01/27/moh-level-valor-leads-to-a-robot-hand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets and Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Defense Biz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=16181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had a chance to sit down with Medal of Honor recipient SFC Leroy Petry a couple of days ago while participating in the AFCEA West 2012 conference in San Diego.  Like all who’ve received the nation’s highest award for valor, his story of courage under fire is amazing.  (Read more about him in Military.com’s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/01/27/moh-level-valor-leads-to-a-robot-hand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>F-35-Style Sensors Could Be Integrated Onto Apaches</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/01/13/f-35-style-sensors-could-be-integrated-onto-apaches/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/01/13/f-35-style-sensors-could-be-integrated-onto-apaches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 16:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets and Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planes, Copters, Blimps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=16018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The future of helicopter tech will come in waves, according to one Army aviation official. As the Army fights to ensure funding for its effort to field a brand new class of choppers, known as joint multirole rotorcraft, some Army officials are hoping to advance the state of the art in chopper tech through gradual [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/01/13/f-35-style-sensors-could-be-integrated-onto-apaches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What DoD’s New Strategy Means for Post-9/11 Tech</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/01/05/what-the-dods-new-strategy-means-for-our-newest-tech/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/01/05/what-the-dods-new-strategy-means-for-our-newest-tech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Around the Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balance of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Downsizing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets and Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine Corps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=15889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are some interesting technology-related quotes that Deputy Defense Secretary Ashton Carter and Vice Chairman of the joint Chiefs, Adm. James Winnefeld just said about the Pentagon’s defense strategy that was unveiled unvieled this morning. The two were responding to a reporters question about whether the UAV fleets that were built up for the fights [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/01/05/what-the-dods-new-strategy-means-for-our-newest-tech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Army Smartphones on Way to Afghanistan</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/12/16/army-smartphones-on-way-to-afghanistan/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2011/12/16/army-smartphones-on-way-to-afghanistan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 22:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghan Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets and Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net-Centric]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=15718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, the Army’s 75th Ranger Regiment is bringing what was supposed to be  the military’s version of a smartphone to Afghanistan. Yup, the software-based JTRS AN/PRC-154 Rifleman Radio and the Android-based GD300 smartphone-style device are about to make their combat debut, according to our own Matt Cox. Here’s a teaser from his story that we’ll running [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2011/12/16/army-smartphones-on-way-to-afghanistan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Chinese Version of Rover?</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/11/01/a-chinese-version-of-rover/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2011/11/01/a-chinese-version-of-rover/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Around the Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balance of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Rising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets and Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net-Centric]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=15203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This photo of what appears to be a PLA er, Chinese Army version of a Joint Terminal Attack Controller — you know, the guy who calls in and coordinates airstrikes when his small unit is in close combat with the enemy. Anyone know what that device he’s holding is? It looks like it might be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2011/11/01/a-chinese-version-of-rover/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>F-35-Style Sensors on Helos? It Could Happen</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/10/18/f-35-style-sensors-on-helos-it-could-happen/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2011/10/18/f-35-style-sensors-on-helos-it-could-happen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arms Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Around the Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35 Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets and Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planes, Copters, Blimps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=15038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all know about the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter’s wild infrared sensor technology, called the Distributed Aperture System, that will (someday) allow pilots to see in a complete bubble for miles around their airplane. If, and when, the system comes online, it will allow F-35 jocks to literally look through the floor of their aircraft by viewing images [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2011/10/18/f-35-style-sensors-on-helos-it-could-happen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>F-35 Pilots’ New Helmet</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/10/13/f-35-pilots-new-helmet/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2011/10/13/f-35-pilots-new-helmet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arms Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35 Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets and Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planes, Copters, Blimps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=14958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You’re looking at what may well be the helmet worn by the first F-35 Joint Strike Fighter pilots at the plane’s schoolhouse at Eglin Air Force Base, Fl. It’s the basis for BAE Systems’ alternate JSF helmet that is being developed due to issues with the plane’s futuristic — and kind of crazy – looking helmet made [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2011/10/13/f-35-pilots-new-helmet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anti Bacterial Military Tent Walls</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/10/11/anti-bacterial-military-tent-walls/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2011/10/11/anti-bacterial-military-tent-walls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Around the Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets and Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medic!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=14913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Combat wounds and field hospital surgery: There are just so many opportunities for an injury to become infected. And infection, after a traumatic injury itself, is the leading cause of amputations, according to medical officials. The more you can eliminate opportunities for infection the better off the patient is going to be. At the annual [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2011/10/11/anti-bacterial-military-tent-walls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steve Jobs’ Influence on the Military</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/10/06/steve-jobs-influence-on-the-military/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2011/10/06/steve-jobs-influence-on-the-military/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 19:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Around the Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civilian Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Security Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets and Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net-Centric]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=14862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple founder Steve Jobs, the Bay Area-bred Buddhist, tech mogul and non-conformist who died yesterday, may not be the first person you associate with the military —  he even issued the famous quote “it’s more fun to be a pirate than join the navy” — his inventions have indeed helped transform the military. First off, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2011/10/06/steve-jobs-influence-on-the-military/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Air Force Tests Electronics-Frying Missile</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/09/22/air-force-successfully-fires-electromagnetic-weapon/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2011/09/22/air-force-successfully-fires-electromagnetic-weapon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets and Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lasers and Ray Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Less-lethal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Alamos and Labs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=14682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imagine a weapon sailing over an enemy city or military target and effectively paralyzing all electronics in its wake while causing almost no physical damage? Sci-fi writers and military planners have dreamed of such things for years. The problem is, the electromagnetic pulse often associated with cooking electronic systems is usually generated by the detonation of a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2011/09/22/air-force-successfully-fires-electromagnetic-weapon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

