<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Defense Tech &#187; Money Money Money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/category/money-money-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 20:06:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>One LCS Class for the Gulf, one LCS Class for the Pacific</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/22/one-lcs-class-for-the-gulf-one-lcs-class-for-the-pacific/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/22/one-lcs-class-for-the-gulf-one-lcs-class-for-the-pacific/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Around the Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balance of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eye on China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ships and Subs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=17292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As expected, Navy officials are on the PR offensive with the Littoral Combat Ship program, saying the little ships will see combat from day one of any fight (you know, to counter the steady stream of reports that say the LCS can’t survive in combat). In fact, the two classes of LCS, the Lockheed-Martin-built Freedom [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/22/one-lcs-class-for-the-gulf-one-lcs-class-for-the-pacific/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fake Parts are Everywhere</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/22/fake-parts-are-everywhere/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/22/fake-parts-are-everywhere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arms Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Around the Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eye on China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ground]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ground Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine Corps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planes, Copters, Blimps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ships and Subs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=17289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, after months of research, Senate Armed Services Committee investigators have discovered “a flood” counterfet parts in everything from critical navigation software for newly modernized C-5 Galaxy cargo planes to “assemblies” destined for RQ-4 Global Hawk spy planes, submarines and even Stryker Mobile Gun Systems. Now, we’ve known that fake parts — usually made in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/22/fake-parts-are-everywhere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>100</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Closing the Tech Gap: China’s Spaceplane</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/14/closing-the-tech-gap-chinas-spaceplane/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/14/closing-the-tech-gap-chinas-spaceplane/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 19:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Around the Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balance of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Rising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=17233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That’s right, the rumors appear to be true. Beijing is joining the United States as the only nations with reusable spaceplane designs that are actually conducting test flights. Beijing reportedly sent its Divine Dragon — or Shenlong — space plane aloft for a successful atmospheric test flight in January, 2011. The U.S. uses its two [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/14/closing-the-tech-gap-chinas-spaceplane/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>107</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Navy Moving Ahead With Effort to Put Lasers on Ships</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/10/navy-moving-ahead-with-effort-to-put-lasers-on-ships/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/10/navy-moving-ahead-with-effort-to-put-lasers-on-ships/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 19:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lasers and Ray Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ships and Subs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=17216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After decades and decades of research and experimenting, the time has finally come to add deadly lasers to U.S. Navy ships’ arsenals, the sea service has decided. That’s right, the Office of Naval Research is moving forward with a plan to arm ships with solid state lasers capable of taking out small enemy vessels that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/10/navy-moving-ahead-with-effort-to-put-lasers-on-ships/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>123</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It’s Official: UK to Fly F-35B JSFs</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/10/its-official-uk-to-fly-f-35b-jsfs/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/10/its-official-uk-to-fly-f-35b-jsfs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 16:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Around the Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35 Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JSF Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planes, Copters, Blimps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ships and Subs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=17210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s official, Britain is going back on its choice to buy F-35C carrier variant Joint Strike Fighters and will buy the F-35B short take-off and vertical landing version of the jet, you know, the model the Brits originally intended to fly. News emerged yesterday that confirming months of rumors that the United Kingdom wanted to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/10/its-official-uk-to-fly-f-35b-jsfs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>111</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your F-35 Flight Test Update</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/08/17189/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/08/17189/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 17:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35 Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JSF Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planes, Copters, Blimps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=17189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here’s your latest update on the unsinkable F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program’s flight testing from Lockheed Martin — who just yesterday received a $237 million contract from the Pentagon to fix design problems with the jet that were discovered during testing. Among the highlights of this announcement is the fact that the plane just passed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/08/17189/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congress Keeps Adding Billions to Pentagon Budget</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/08/congress-keeps-adding-billions-to-pentagon-budget/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/08/congress-keeps-adding-billions-to-pentagon-budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 15:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ground]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine Corps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=17185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the clock ticks ever closer to the triggering of the sequestration time bomb — you know, the massive cuts to government spending that are set to take effect next January unless Congress moves to eliminate them — lawmakers are still forcing more cash on the Pentagon than it says it needs during this time [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/08/congress-keeps-adding-billions-to-pentagon-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USAF Re-Opens Light Attack Contest.</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/07/usaf-re-opens-light-attack-contest/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/07/usaf-re-opens-light-attack-contest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 17:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghan Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planes, Copters, Blimps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=17182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, the Air Force’s effort to buy a fleet of 20 or so light attack turboprops has kicked off once again. Yup, several months after a ‘paperwork error’ caused the service to tear up the $355 million contract that it gave Embraer and Sierra Nevada for 20 Brazilian-made Super Tucanos in February, the effort is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/07/usaf-re-opens-light-attack-contest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>125</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Wants to Buy a Stealth Ship?</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/04/27/who-wants-to-buy-a-stealth-ship/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/04/27/who-wants-to-buy-a-stealth-ship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 22:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ships and Subs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=17122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who wants to buy the U.S. Navy’s original stealth ship? Yup, the Lockheed Martin-built Sea Shadow is being auctioned off from its home in the Suisun Bay ghost fleet in California. You’d better hurry up and bid since the price is already north of $100,000 (still  bargain, you get the stealthy ship and the historic [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/04/27/who-wants-to-buy-a-stealth-ship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>92</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Block 30 Global Hawks May Stay</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/04/27/block-30-global-hawks-may-stay/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/04/27/block-30-global-hawks-may-stay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planes, Copters, Blimps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=17118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, despite the fact that Air Force leaders insist that the U-2 can get the same job done for less cash, lawmakers are forcing the service to keep the block 30 RQ-4 Global Hawk high-altitude spy done. The Air Force announced it was mothballing the Block 30s and keep the U-2 dragonlady’s that the RQ-4 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/04/27/block-30-global-hawks-may-stay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

