<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Defense Tech &#187; MRAP Edge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/category/mrap-edge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 20:06:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Last MRAP to Serve in Iraq Heads Home</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/04/09/last-mrap-to-serve-in-iraq-heads-home/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/04/09/last-mrap-to-serve-in-iraq-heads-home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 21:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ground]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ground Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRAP Edge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=16893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here you have it. This photo shows the last MRAP to be shipped home after serving in the Iraq war. This particular MRAP is a Caiman PLus model and it drove out of Iraq on Dec. 18, 2011 as the last U.S. troops were leaving the country. She’s now en route back to the states [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/04/09/last-mrap-to-serve-in-iraq-heads-home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The U.S.’ Post 9/11 Weapons Tech</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/09/09/the-u-s-post-911-weapons-tech/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2011/09/09/the-u-s-post-911-weapons-tech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 18:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arms Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Around the Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloak and Dagger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterinsurgency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drone Bombing Campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets and Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grand Ole Osprey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ground Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IED War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine Corps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRAP Edge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net-Centric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planes, Copters, Blimps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Ops]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=14408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being part of Military.com, it wouldn’t be right if we here at DT didn’t do something to recognize the ten-year anniversary of 9/11. We figured we’d list off some of the most significant advances in weaponry that have occurred over the last decade — some driven by the wars spawned by that day, some independent of them. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2011/09/09/the-u-s-post-911-weapons-tech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is China Buying MRAPs? (updated)</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/07/15/why-is-china-buying-mraps/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2011/07/15/why-is-china-buying-mraps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 18:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Armor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arms Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Around the Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balance of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Rising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterinsurgency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eye on China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ground Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRAP Edge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=13685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, why is China buying MRAPs especially at a time when some in the U.S. defense establishment are calling for the U.S. to cut the the purchase of such gear after we leave Iraq and Afghanistan so that we can focus on buying high-end weapons to counter China with? The picture above shows one of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2011/07/15/why-is-china-buying-mraps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DT Video: BAE Systems’ RG35 Armored Vehicle</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/05/10/dt-video-bae-systems-rg35-armored-vehicle/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2011/05/10/dt-video-bae-systems-rg35-armored-vehicle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 16:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Around the Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ground Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRAP Edge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Lounge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=12854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out this DT exclusive video of BAE Systems South Africa’s RG35 Reconnaisance, Patrol and Utility Vehicle ripping it up. It’s being offered to the Canadian military for its Tactical Armoured Vehicle Program and features an armored crew citadel at its core that’s designed to protect the people inside from explosions and small arms fire. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2011/05/10/dt-video-bae-systems-rg35-armored-vehicle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amos: I’ll Be Able To Drive EFV Replacement Within Four Years</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/03/01/amos-ill-be-able-to-drive-efv-replacement-within-four-years/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2011/03/01/amos-ill-be-able-to-drive-efv-replacement-within-four-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 21:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Acquisition Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Armor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine Corps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRAP Edge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea Services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=11607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marine Corps Commandant Gen. James Amos today shed some much anticipated light on when the Corps could see a replacement for the cancelled Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle, telling lawmakers he expects to drive its replacement by the end of his tenure as commandant. “There are two answers to that, one is as Commandant of the Marine [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2011/03/01/amos-ill-be-able-to-drive-efv-replacement-within-four-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Sling Seat that Saves Lives</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/10/28/a-sling-seat-that-saves-lives/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2010/10/28/a-sling-seat-that-saves-lives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>christian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ground Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRAP Edge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=9348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s not everyday a manufacturer will ask a customer in front of a crowd of people whether he was satisfied with a product. Not unrehearsed and unscripted, anyway. But that’s what Frank Dlubak did Oct. 26 at the Association of the US Army conference in Washington, after hearing Army Spc. Jim Mata tell of being [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2010/10/28/a-sling-seat-that-saves-lives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marines Eye Ground Vehicles, Budget In Mind</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/10/13/marines-eye-ground-vehicles-budget-in-mind/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2010/10/13/marines-eye-ground-vehicles-budget-in-mind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>christian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ground Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRAP Edge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=9096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From our friends at Aviation Week – Tough economic realities looming in defense spending are casting a shadow over U.S. Marine Corps plans for its ground tactical fleet, which will likely soon see orders trimmed or possibly scrapped. Every program in the corps’ fleet, from Humvees to marine personnel carriers (MPC), is under service scrutiny [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2010/10/13/marines-eye-ground-vehicles-budget-in-mind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>M-ATV Builder Oshkosh Pushes Back on DT Reports From the Field</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/05/28/m-atv-builder-oshkosh-pushes-back-on-dt-reports-from-the-field/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2010/05/28/m-atv-builder-oshkosh-pushes-back-on-dt-reports-from-the-field/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 13:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MRAP Edge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=7388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[M-ATV builder Oshkosh, and the Marine Corps program office that manages M-ATVs, didn’t much like the story we ran the other day from our embedded correspondent Christian Lowe who reported that troops in Afghanistan are no longer allowed off base in anything but heavily armored IED-resistant vehicles. Well, they liked parts of the story. This [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2010/05/28/m-atv-builder-oshkosh-pushes-back-on-dt-reports-from-the-field/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MRAPs Take Over for Humvees Off Base</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/05/24/mraps-take-over-for-humvees-off-base/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2010/05/24/mraps-take-over-for-humvees-off-base/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 13:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghan Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRAP Edge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=7244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our own Christian Lowe is embedded with U.S. forces in Afghanistan through June 1 and sends us this dispatch from FOB Sharana in eastern Afghanistan. By Christian Lowe FORWARD OPERATING BASE SHARANA, Afghanistan — In one of the most conspicuous shifts in policy since the war in Afghanistan began, local Army commanders have ordered that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2010/05/24/mraps-take-over-for-humvees-off-base/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conway Wants His Marines To Start Shedding Weight</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/26/conway-wants-his-marines-to-start-shedding-weight/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/26/conway-wants-his-marines-to-start-shedding-weight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MRAP Edge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ships and Subs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JLTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine Corps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRAP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=6274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do you squeeze two Marine Expeditionary Brigades onto 33 amphibious ships when in reality they require 38? You make them shed the weight they gained over the past seven years fighting on Iraq’s IED strewn battlefields, said Marine Corps Commandant Gen. James Conway yesterday in an editorial board with Military.com. Lifting two full MEBs [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/26/conway-wants-his-marines-to-start-shedding-weight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

