<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Defense Tech &#187; Ships and Subs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/category/ships-and-subs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 20:06:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>10-Hour Blaze Aboard USS Miami (updated)</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/24/10-hour-blaze-aboard-uss-miami/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/24/10-hour-blaze-aboard-uss-miami/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 13:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ships and Subs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=17302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That’s right. A fire burned for 10-hours last night aboard the nuclear-powered Los Angeles class attack submarine, USS Miami, while she was in drydock at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard in Kittery, Me. All we know now is that seven people were hurt fighting the fire and that the blaze was contained to her forward spaces [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/24/10-hour-blaze-aboard-uss-miami/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>74</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One LCS Class for the Gulf, one LCS Class for the Pacific</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/22/one-lcs-class-for-the-gulf-one-lcs-class-for-the-pacific/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/22/one-lcs-class-for-the-gulf-one-lcs-class-for-the-pacific/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Around the Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balance of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eye on China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ships and Subs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=17292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As expected, Navy officials are on the PR offensive with the Littoral Combat Ship program, saying the little ships will see combat from day one of any fight (you know, to counter the steady stream of reports that say the LCS can’t survive in combat). In fact, the two classes of LCS, the Lockheed-Martin-built Freedom [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/22/one-lcs-class-for-the-gulf-one-lcs-class-for-the-pacific/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fake Parts are Everywhere</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/22/fake-parts-are-everywhere/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/22/fake-parts-are-everywhere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arms Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Around the Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eye on China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ground]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ground Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine Corps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planes, Copters, Blimps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ships and Subs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=17289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, after months of research, Senate Armed Services Committee investigators have discovered “a flood” counterfet parts in everything from critical navigation software for newly modernized C-5 Galaxy cargo planes to “assemblies” destined for RQ-4 Global Hawk spy planes, submarines and even Stryker Mobile Gun Systems. Now, we’ve known that fake parts — usually made in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/22/fake-parts-are-everywhere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>100</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pics of the Day: On a Boat!</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/18/pics-of-the-day-shipping-ships/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/18/pics-of-the-day-shipping-ships/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 15:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Around the Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ships and Subs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=17271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So remember how Chief of Naval Operations Adm. jonathan Greenert announced in March that he was sending four Avenger-class minesweepers (technically they’re called mine countermeasures ships) to the Persian Gulf, just to “be sure … that we are ready” in case Iran tried anything weird aimed at cutting off a massive quantity of the world’s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/18/pics-of-the-day-shipping-ships/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Navy Moving Ahead With Effort to Put Lasers on Ships</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/10/navy-moving-ahead-with-effort-to-put-lasers-on-ships/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/10/navy-moving-ahead-with-effort-to-put-lasers-on-ships/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 19:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lasers and Ray Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ships and Subs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=17216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After decades and decades of research and experimenting, the time has finally come to add deadly lasers to U.S. Navy ships’ arsenals, the sea service has decided. That’s right, the Office of Naval Research is moving forward with a plan to arm ships with solid state lasers capable of taking out small enemy vessels that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/10/navy-moving-ahead-with-effort-to-put-lasers-on-ships/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>123</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It’s Official: UK to Fly F-35B JSFs</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/10/its-official-uk-to-fly-f-35b-jsfs/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/10/its-official-uk-to-fly-f-35b-jsfs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 16:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Around the Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35 Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JSF Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planes, Copters, Blimps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ships and Subs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=17210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s official, Britain is going back on its choice to buy F-35C carrier variant Joint Strike Fighters and will buy the F-35B short take-off and vertical landing version of the jet, you know, the model the Brits originally intended to fly. News emerged yesterday that confirming months of rumors that the United Kingdom wanted to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/10/its-official-uk-to-fly-f-35b-jsfs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>111</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mid Week Video: China’s Carrier Up-Close</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/02/mid-week-video-chinas-carrier-up-close/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/02/mid-week-video-chinas-carrier-up-close/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 15:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Around the Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Rising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eye on China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ships and Subs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Lounge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=17142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you haven’t seen this yet, its the first close-up video I’ve watched showing China’s aircraft carrier, the ex-Soviet Varyag, actually conducting any type of operations. In this case, she’s returning to port following her latest “scientific” cruise. Click through the jump to enjoy. The close-up footage is toward the second half of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/05/02/mid-week-video-chinas-carrier-up-close/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>250</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Wants to Buy a Stealth Ship?</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/04/27/who-wants-to-buy-a-stealth-ship/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/04/27/who-wants-to-buy-a-stealth-ship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 22:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ships and Subs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=17122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who wants to buy the U.S. Navy’s original stealth ship? Yup, the Lockheed Martin-built Sea Shadow is being auctioned off from its home in the Suisun Bay ghost fleet in California. You’d better hurry up and bid since the price is already north of $100,000 (still  bargain, you get the stealthy ship and the historic [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/04/27/who-wants-to-buy-a-stealth-ship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>92</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iran Pretends to Control the Strait of Hormuz</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/04/23/iran-pretends-to-control-the-strait-of-hormuz/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/04/23/iran-pretends-to-control-the-strait-of-hormuz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ships and Subs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Defense Biz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=17051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, this is hilarious. In addition to saying it knows all the secrets of America’s infamous RQ-170 Sentinel UAV, Iran is claiming to have control over who enters and exits the Persian Gulf. Yes, Iran is trying to imply that American carrier battle groups are checking in with the Iraniang Revolutionary Guard Corps to make [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/04/23/iran-pretends-to-control-the-strait-of-hormuz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>93</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pics of the Day: Look Who’s Headed to Sea Again</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/04/20/pics-of-the-day-look-whos-headed-to-sea-again/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/04/20/pics-of-the-day-look-whos-headed-to-sea-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Around the Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balance of Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Rising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eye on China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ships and Subs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=17040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Happy Friday afternoon. It appears that China’s aircraft carrier, the ex-Soviet Varyag is heading out to open seas once again. Still no word on when she’ll have aircraft operating off her flight deck while she’s underway. Click through the jump for more pictures. Via China Defense Blog    ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/04/20/pics-of-the-day-look-whos-headed-to-sea-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>150</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

