<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Defense Tech &#187; The Deadlies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/category/the-deadlies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 20:06:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Missiles That Matter</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/04/13/the-missiles-that-matter/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/04/13/the-missiles-that-matter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ammo and Munitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Around the Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assymetric Warriors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterinsurgency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terror Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Deadlies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=16933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here’s our quick mention of the North Korean Rocket fail — that made everyone angry — yesterday. Yup, the big, what turned out to be an almost non-event that everyone’s been obsessing over and will now promptly forget. (But, wait, you know someone’s going to start raising whether the failiure of the long-ragen rocket aimed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/04/13/the-missiles-that-matter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conventional Vs SOF Helos?</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/04/04/conventional-vs-sof-helos/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/04/04/conventional-vs-sof-helos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 20:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghan Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Door Kickers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planes, Copters, Blimps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rotary Wing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Deadlies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=16837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here’s question we’ve heard several times in the months since last summer’s downing of a CH-47 Chinook in Afghanistan that killed 30 U.S. troops, including 17 Navy SEALs, and eight Afghan Commandos; would those men still be alive if they were traveling aboard an aircraft belonging to the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment rather than [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/04/04/conventional-vs-sof-helos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chilling Audio: B-52s Being Shot at Over Hanoi</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/03/30/chilling-audio-b-52s-shot-at-over-hanoi/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/03/30/chilling-audio-b-52s-shot-at-over-hanoi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planes, Copters, Blimps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Deadlies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Lounge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=16786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Listen to this tape of B-52 bomber crews as they get shot at by multiple surface to air missiles while completing a bombing run over Hanoi during Operation Linebacker II in late 1972. You can hear both the professionalism and tension in the aircrews’ voices as they fly through countless SAM attacks and endure the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/03/30/chilling-audio-b-52s-shot-at-over-hanoi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>101</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insurgents Used Cell Phone Geotags to Destroy AH-64s in Iraq</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/03/15/insurgents-used-cell-phone-geotags-to-destroy-ah-64s-in-iraq/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/03/15/insurgents-used-cell-phone-geotags-to-destroy-ah-64s-in-iraq/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Around the Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Security Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Deadlies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=16680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here’s a battlefield safety issue that some people have been warning about –and others have been ignoring —  for a while now; an enemy using social media and cellphone geotagging to identify the precise location of troops on a battlefield. When you take a photo with your cellphone, the gps coordinates of the location you [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/03/15/insurgents-used-cell-phone-geotags-to-destroy-ah-64s-in-iraq/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Western Special Operators Already Inside Syria?</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/03/06/are-western-sof-already-inside-syria/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/03/06/are-western-sof-already-inside-syria/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 19:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Around the Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assymetric Warriors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commandos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contingency Ops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Ops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Deadlies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=16561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well then. Western special operators may well be on the ground in Syria covertly conducting reconnaissance missions and training rebels fighting the regime of Bashar al Assad, much like Western SOF troops did in Libya last year, according to the STRATFOR documents that were recently published by Wikileaks. Apparently, a STRATFOR analyst sat down with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/03/06/are-western-sof-already-inside-syria/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video: BAE’s New Railgun Firing for First Time</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/28/video-baes-new-railgun-firing-for-first-time/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/28/video-baes-new-railgun-firing-for-first-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fire for Effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Deadlies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Lounge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=16468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, the Office of Naval Research has begun test firing BAE’s new 32-megajoule railgun and we’ve got the video to prove it. Remember, the Navy wants a 20 to 32 megajoule railgun that can fire a projectile at speeds of up to 5,600 miles per hour over distances of 50 to 100 nautical miles. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/28/video-baes-new-railgun-firing-for-first-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>76</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video: Inside a KC-130J Harvest Hawk Gunship</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/14/video-inside-a-kc-130j-harvest-hawk-gunship/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/14/video-inside-a-kc-130j-harvest-hawk-gunship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fire for Effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine Corps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planes, Copters, Blimps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Deadlies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Lounge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[You can run...]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=16395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the Marine Corps’ KC-130J Harvest Hawk has been around for a little while now. As you know, Harvest Hawks are KC-130J tankers equipped with plug and play air to ground missile and sensor systems allowing them to pinch hit as gunships for Marines on the ground, and they’ve been doing plenty of shooting in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/14/video-inside-a-kc-130j-harvest-hawk-gunship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Navy Moving Ahead With Railgun Devo</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/09/navy-moving-ahead-with-railgun-devo/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/09/navy-moving-ahead-with-railgun-devo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fire for Effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Deadlies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=16358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here’s a little story that’s been making the Internet rounds lately; the Navy is about to take one more step toward making high-powered railguns a ship-board reality. Yup, the Office of Naval Research is about to start test firing a BAE Systems-built railgun and another made by General Atomics (watch a badass video of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/02/09/navy-moving-ahead-with-railgun-devo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>99</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USAF’s Big Penetrator Needs to Be Harder</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/01/30/usafs-big-penetrator-needs-to-be-harder/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/01/30/usafs-big-penetrator-needs-to-be-harder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ammo and Munitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arms Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast Movers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planes, Copters, Blimps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Deadlies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=16270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yup, the Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) needs to be harder, according to anonymous Pentagon sources cited in a Wall Street Journal article. A series of recent tests found that the Air Force’s 30,000-pound tool for penetrating 32 stories of reinforced concrete might not have enough penetrating power to take out Iran’s most heavily protected nuclear [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/01/30/usafs-big-penetrator-needs-to-be-harder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>159</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Basic Mistake That Trashed a JSTARS</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/01/27/a-basic-mistake-that-trashed-a-jstars/</link>
		<comments>http://defensetech.org/2012/01/27/a-basic-mistake-that-trashed-a-jstars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Money Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planes, Copters, Blimps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Deadlies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Defense Biz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=16157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imagine flying, along with 20 or so fellow aircrew, in an Air Force E-8C Joint Surveillance Targeting and Attack Radar System (JSTARS) jet for a mission to track down insurgents planting roadside bombs in Iraq or Afghanistan. You’ve just taken off from your base in Qatar but before you can go scan the ground for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://defensetech.org/2012/01/27/a-basic-mistake-that-trashed-a-jstars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>243</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

