<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments for Defense Tech</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:38:08 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>Comment on Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated) by Roy M Brown</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/16/petraeus-goes-before-sasc-today/comment-page-1/#comment-196292</link> <dc:creator>Roy M Brown</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:38:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=6161#comment-196292</guid> <description>of course it will be a disaster! however, that fact wont prevent the current US Administration from attempting it </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course it will be a disaster! however, that fact wont prevent the current US Administration from attempting it</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million by Pete</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/20/jsf-price-tag-jumps-to-135-million/comment-page-1/#comment-196291</link> <dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:55:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=6236#comment-196291</guid> <description>Lets see what happens when the Russian T-50 or what ever ends up being call cost one third and every third world country have a couple of them. So much for exclusivity. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets see what happens when the Russian T-50 or what ever ends up being call cost one third and every third world country have a couple of them. So much for exclusivity.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on South of the Border Mayhem by Thunder350</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/15/south-of-the-border-mayhem/comment-page-1/#comment-196306</link> <dc:creator>Thunder350</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:37:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=6154#comment-196306</guid> <description>Committing resources, doesn&#039;t mean sending troops into Mexico guns blazing. If I was in charge I would deploy the national guard from all border states to well... secure the border... finish building the fence, and guard it. Work something out with Mexico to either give them some UAV&#039;s, or for us to use them and relay the information to Mexico&#039;s military. Commit to doing all things possibly covertly. (spec ops, CIA, etc). </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Committing resources, doesn’t mean sending troops into Mexico guns blazing. If I was in charge I would deploy the national guard from all border states to well… secure the border… finish building the fence, and guard it. Work something out with Mexico to either give them some UAV’s, or for us to use them and relay the information to Mexico’s military. Commit to doing all things possibly covertly. (spec ops, CIA, etc).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft by lcdr_kent</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/19/jfcom%e2%80%99s-mattis-pushes-light-iw-aircraft/comment-page-1/#comment-196290</link> <dc:creator>lcdr_kent</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:37:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=6227#comment-196290</guid> <description>The AF could put T-6s in service for A-stan in a month if they were requested.  I think they like getting &#039;new&#039; aircraft to support new missions.  What is to keep the Tillyban from getting stinger type weapons from their friends and shooting slow movers down? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The AF could put T-6s in service for A-stan in a month if they were requested.  I think they like getting ‘new’ aircraft to support new missions.  What is to keep the Tillyban from getting stinger type weapons from their friends and shooting slow movers down?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million by jbierling</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/20/jsf-price-tag-jumps-to-135-million/comment-page-1/#comment-196305</link> <dc:creator>jbierling</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:19:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=6236#comment-196305</guid> <description>135 vs 360.  But how much per F-22 if we were building 2400+ of them?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>135 vs 360.  But how much per F-22 if we were building 2400+ of them?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet by John</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/19/eads-tanker-not-dead-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-196304</link> <dc:creator>John</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:04:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=6232#comment-196304</guid> <description>Lockheed and Boeing: working both ends of a bent over taxpayer.
People should start going to prison over the ^&amp;%^$ing bullsh!t that passes for military procurement. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lockheed and Boeing: working both ends of a bent over taxpayer.</p><p>People should start going to prison over the ^&amp;%^$ing bullsh!t that passes for military procurement.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million by Dan</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/20/jsf-price-tag-jumps-to-135-million/comment-page-1/#comment-196303</link> <dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:02:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=6236#comment-196303</guid> <description>Actual costs of the F-22 are now down to about $110M per copy--all R&amp;D costs are sunk and the AF only pays for actual hardware.  Better jet than F-35 for less dollars.  But the Congress is too busy passing social reform to notice the disparity. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actual costs of the F-22 are now down to about $110M per copy–all R&amp;D costs are sunk and the AF only pays for actual hardware.  Better jet than F-35 for less dollars.  But the Congress is too busy passing social reform to notice the disparity.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million by John</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/20/jsf-price-tag-jumps-to-135-million/comment-page-1/#comment-196302</link> <dc:creator>John</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:01:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=6236#comment-196302</guid> <description>We need to put an end to the defense contractor corporate welfare.  Lockheed is RAPING the taxpayers.  They should be barred from ever bidding on defense programs again.
Perhaps we should just start importing Russian fighters. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need to put an end to the defense contractor corporate welfare.  Lockheed is RAPING the taxpayers.  They should be barred from ever bidding on defense programs again.</p><p>Perhaps we should just start importing Russian fighters.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round by Gunnery Instructor</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/12/army-fast-tracks-gps-mortar-round/comment-page-1/#comment-196301</link> <dc:creator>Gunnery Instructor</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:43:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=6120#comment-196301</guid> <description>I beg to differ about mortar being more accurate that ARTY.  It&#039;s a crap shoot right now.  Mortarmen chunk the rounds down range and have no idea where they will impact.  It&#039;s great that the rate of fire is high, but ONE SHOT -ONE KILL is the way to go.  A GPS guided mortar round will help mortarmen achieve accurate first round fire for effect. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I beg to differ about mortar being more accurate that ARTY.  It’s a crap shoot right now.  Mortarmen chunk the rounds down range and have no idea where they will impact.  It’s great that the rate of fire is high, but ONE SHOT –ONE KILL is the way to go.  A GPS guided mortar round will help mortarmen achieve accurate first round fire for effect.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round by Gunnery Instr</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/12/army-fast-tracks-gps-mortar-round/comment-page-1/#comment-196300</link> <dc:creator>Gunnery Instr</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:38:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://defensetech.org/?p=6120#comment-196300</guid> <description>The cost would likely (eventually) be much less than the Excalibur round.  Excalibur has quite a bit more capabilities than this would need.  This is more like a PGK fuze technology used in a mortar body.  PGK is just a fuze that can turn a regular artillery round into a gps guided munition.  It has a much better CEP than conventional rounds but not quite as much as Excalibur, and is not nearly as expensive. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cost would likely (eventually) be much less than the Excalibur round.  Excalibur has quite a bit more capabilities than this would need.  This is more like a PGK fuze technology used in a mortar body.  PGK is just a fuze that can turn a regular artillery round into a gps guided munition.  It has a much better CEP than conventional rounds but not quite as much as Excalibur, and is not nearly as expensive.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 27/30 queries in 0.007 seconds using apc

Served from: unknown.dal.cologlobal.com @ 2010-03-20 18:33:32 -->